<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with academia and politics</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/academia+politics</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'academia' and 'politics' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 06:28:51 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 06:28:51 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Revolt of the Lab Rats? Or Voyeur Caught Watching?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/71753/Revolt%2Dof%2Dthe%2DLab%2DRats%2DOr%2DVoyeur%2DCaught%2DWatching</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://datamining.typepad.com/data_mining/2008/05/i-can-haz-prime.html"&gt;When your research subjects notice you watching....&lt;/a&gt; The fine folks over at Little Green Footballs &lt;a href=&quot;http://littlegreenfootballs.com/article/29965_An_LGF_Experiment_at_Carnegie_Mellon/&quot;&gt;discovered&lt;/a&gt; &quot;a pile of results and code&quot; from an observation of their on-line discourse on a server at Carnegie Mellon. That led to a heated thread of sometimes paranoid speculation that eventually calmed down (somewhat) when the researcher&apos;s academic advisors posted &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~nasmith/LGF.txt&quot;&gt;a good-natured mea-culpa (wea-culpa?) and explanation&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.71753</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 06:28:51 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>academia</category>
		<category>blogs</category>
		<category>lgf</category>
		<category>littlegreenfootballs</category>
		<category>paranoia</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>research</category>
		<dc:creator>mmahaffie</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Liberals, Womens&apos; Studies, and Kos.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/42770/Liberals%2DWomens%2DStudies%2Dand%2DKos</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://preposterousuniverse.blogspot.com/2005_06_01_preposterousuniverse_archive.html#111851897886373720"&gt;Liberals, Womens&apos; Studies, Beer Ads, and Kos.&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.42770</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2005 04:19:19 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>academia</category>
		<category>advertising</category>
		<category>feminism</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<dc:creator>Tlogmer</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Thou shalt not criticize Republicans</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/39625/Thou%2Dshalt%2Dnot%2Dcriticize%2DRepublicans</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.dispatch.com/election.php?story=dispatch/2005/01/27/20050127-C1-04.html"&gt;&quot;80 percent or so of them (professors) are Democrats, liberals or socialists or card-carrying Communists.&quot;&lt;/a&gt; So says Ohio Senator Larry A. Mumper, who has &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.legislature.state.oh.us/bills.cfm?ID=126_SB_24&quot;&gt;introduced&lt;/a&gt; an &quot;academic bill of rights for higher education,&quot; which would prohibit professors from &quot;persistently discussing controversial issues in class or from using their classes to push political, ideological, religious or anti-religious views.&quot; The text of the bill is adapted from an &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.studentsforacademicfreedom.org&quot;&gt;organization &lt;/a&gt; founded by Marxist-turned-conservative activist &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Horowitz&quot;&gt;David&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thenation.com/doc.mhtml?i=20000703&amp;c=1&amp;s=sherman&quot;&gt;Horowitz&lt;/a&gt;.   Similar bills have been introduced in other states. Is this a genuine attempt to foster &lt;a href=&quot;http://chronicle.com/free/v50/i23/23b01201.htm&quot;&gt;&quot;intellectual diversity&quot;&lt;/a&gt;, or a &lt;a href=&quot;http://chronicle.com/free/v50/i23/23b01301.htm&quot;&gt;&quot;trojan horse&quot;&lt;/a&gt; to force universities to adopt a quota system for conservative professors?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.39625</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Feb 2005 14:43:12 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>academia</category>
		<category>censorship</category>
		<category>conservative_activism</category>
		<category>free_speech</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<dc:creator>googly</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>HR 3077 - unprecedented federally mandated intrusion into the content and conduct of university-based area studies programmes.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/32541/HR%2D3077%2Dunprecedented%2Dfederally%2Dmandated%2Dintrusion%2Dinto%2Dthe%2Dcontent%2Dand%2Dconduct%2Dof%2Duniversitybased%2Darea%2Dstudies%2Dprogrammes</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.lrb.co.uk/v26/n07/print/roy_01_.html"&gt;HR 3077 - &quot;unprecedented federally mandated intrusion into the content and conduct of university-based area studies programmes.&quot;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&quot;There is a great deal at stake for American higher education and academic freedom. If HR 3077 becomes law - the Senate will review the bill next - it will create a board that monitors how closely universities reflect government policy. Since the legislation assumes that any flaw lies &apos;with the experts, not the policy&apos;, the government could be given the power to introduce politically sympathetic voices into the academic mainstream and to reshape the boundaries of academic inquiry. Institutional resistance would presumably be punished by the withdrawal of funds, which would be extremely damaging to Middle East centres especially.&quot;
&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
you didn&apos;t have  reason to call your congressperson tomorrow? you do now. frightening.
&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
via the excellent &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.openbrackets.com/&quot;&gt;openbrackets.com&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.32541</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2004 17:02:28 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>academia</category>
		<category>colleges</category>
		<category>congress</category>
		<category>education</category>
		<category>middleeast</category>
		<category>policy</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>universities</category>
		<dc:creator>specialk420</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/15644/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.centerforbookculture.org/context/no9/miller.html"&gt;How serious a problem is anti-intellectualism?&lt;/a&gt; Is it that the academy is out of touch and treacherous? Or are the public egged on to ignore and deprecate the wisdom of left-wing intellectuals by a cynical media, as this author alleges? &lt;small&gt;[more inside]&lt;/small&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.15644</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2002 16:02:41 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>academia</category>
		<category>anti-intellectualism</category>
		<category>intellectuals</category>
		<category>MarkCrispinMiller</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<dc:creator>Gaz</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


