<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with aclu and brokenlink</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/aclu+brokenlink</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'aclu' and 'brokenlink' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2004 14:22:55 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2004 14:22:55 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Yes Virginia, There are Christian ACLU Lawyers</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/38163/Yes%2DVirginia%2DThere%2Dare%2DChristian%2DACLU%2DLawyers</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.scalzi.com/whatever/003093.html"&gt;A call for Christian lawyers&lt;/a&gt; who have worked for the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.aclu.org&quot;&gt;ACLU&lt;/a&gt;. The ACLU tries &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.aclu.org/ReligiousLiberty/ReligiousLiberty.cfm?ID=16295&amp;c=142&quot;&gt;to&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.aclu.org/ReligiousLiberty/ReligiousLiberty.cfm?ID=15897&amp;c=141&quot;&gt;be&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://archive.aclu.org/news/2002/n071102b.html&quot;&gt;balanced&lt;/a&gt; , but considering the amount of effort they have put forth to inhibit Christian influence from/to the government, should a Christian lawyer work for them?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.38163</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2004 14:22:55 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>ACLU</category>
		<category>AmericanCivilLibertiesUnion</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>Christian</category>
		<category>civilrights</category>
		<category>conflict</category>
		<category>conflictofinterest</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>lawyers</category>
		<category>religion</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<dc:creator>urlnotfound</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Write 500 times: Skools in Louisiana suk</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/29974/Write%2D500%2Dtimes%2DSkools%2Din%2DLouisiana%2Dsuk</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.aclu.org/LesbianGayRights/LesbianGayRights.cfm?ID=14481&amp;amp;c=104"&gt;&apos;Gay&apos; Is Not a Dirty Word.&lt;/a&gt; The ACLU is outing a Louisiana Elementary school which punished a second grader for using the word &quot;gay&quot; when answering a classmate&apos;s question about his family.  Not only did the teacher freak, sending little Marcus to the principal&apos;s office for using a &quot;bad word&quot;, but the school made Marcus go to a behavioral clinic the following week and repeatedly write &#8220;I will never use the word &#8216;gay&#8217; in school again.&#8221;  Great use of a teachable moment for all.
Extra credit assignment &lt;small&gt;(these require Acrobat)&lt;/small&gt;: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.aclu.org/Files/OpenFile.cfm?id=14477&quot;&gt;(Student Behavior Contract)&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.aclu.org/Files/OpenFile.cfm?id=14479&quot;&gt;(Behavioral Incident Report)&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.29974</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2003 17:57:16 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>aclu</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>freedomofspeech</category>
		<category>gay</category>
		<category>queer</category>
		<dc:creator>msacheson</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Big FCC rollback vote this Tuesday.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/28316/Big%2DFCC%2Drollback%2Dvote%2Dthis%2DTuesday</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.mediareform.net/dorganlott911.htm"&gt;Big FCC rollback vote this Tuesday.&lt;/a&gt; I know a lot of mefites are passionate about this issue and it looks like Senators Byron Dorgan (D&#8211;ND) and Trent Lott (R-MS) are doing something about it.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.aclu.org/FreeSpeech/FreeSpeech.cfm?ID=12720&amp;c=42&quot;&gt;More info, free faxes, etc at the ACLU.&lt;/a&gt;  &lt;a href=&quot;http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d108:s.j.res.00017:&quot;&gt;Read S.J. res 17 here.&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.28316</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2003 13:24:52 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>ACLU</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>FCC</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>ownership</category>
		<category>radio</category>
		<category>senate</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<dc:creator>skallas</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Please step away from the line....</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/28170/Please%2Dstep%2Daway%2Dfrom%2Dthe%2Dline</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&amp;amp;cid=1802&amp;amp;ncid=1802&amp;amp;e=2&amp;amp;u=/washpost/20030909/ts_washpost/a45434_2003sep8"&gt;All US Air Passengers to be Profiled, and 1% Will be Banned from Boarding.&lt;/a&gt; In the most aggressive -- and, some say, invasive -- step yet, the federal government and the airlines will phase in a computer system next year to measure the risk posed by every passenger on every flight in the United States. Up to 8 percent of passengers who board flights will be coded &quot;yellow&quot; and pulled for additional screening. An estimated 1 to 2 percent will be labeled &quot;red&quot; and will be prohibited from boarding. These passengers also will face police questioning and may be arrested.  &lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;[More Inside....]&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.28170</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2003 11:01:12 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>ACLU</category>
		<category>airtravel</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>fear</category>
		<category>flight</category>
		<category>homelandsecurity</category>
		<category>TSA</category>
		<dc:creator>Dunvegan</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>No more Scarlet Letter!</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/25373/No%2Dmore%2DScarlet%2DLetter</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.cnn.com/2003/LAW/04/24/publishing.adoptions.ap/index.html"&gt;Is this your fetus? Are you the one I slept with?&lt;/a&gt; Remember when we discussed &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/19006&quot;&gt;this &lt;/a&gt;before?  Florida has now been forced by 4 plaintiffs and the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.aclu.org/ReproductiveRights/ReproductiveRights.cfm?ID=12443&amp;c=30&quot;&gt;ACLU &lt;/a&gt;to repeal the so-called Scarlet Letter law that forces women who are pregnant and giving children up for adoption to take out an ad local papers once a week for 4 weeks, stating her name and her sexual history in the last year, to let men know if they *might* be the father.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.aclu.org/ReproductiveRights/ReproductiveRights.cfm?ID=11126&amp;c=30&quot;&gt;Here &lt;/a&gt;is the ACLU legal brief.  The details about the decision are in the first link. 

Thank god for the ACLU.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.25373</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2003 11:41:02 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>ACLU</category>
		<category>adoption</category>
		<category>adoptions</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>Florida</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>privacy</category>
		<category>sex</category>
		<category>sexualhistory</category>
		<dc:creator>aacheson</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/20316/</link>
		<description> A bill is currently being pushed through Congress that will give health care providers, including those that are federally funded, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.aclu.org/action/refusal107.html&quot;&gt;the right to refuse to perform abortions or administer contraceptive medication for personal moral reasons&lt;/a&gt;.  Next week: firefighters allowed to let houses burn down because they hate the color of the curtains.
 </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.20316</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2002 20:41:28 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>abortion</category>
		<category>ACLU</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>contraceptives</category>
		<category>doctors</category>
		<category>health</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>morality</category>
		<category>refusal</category>
		<category>religion</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<dc:creator>XQUZYPHYR</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Jerry Falwell being defended by ACLU.(via FARK)</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/12729/Jerry%2DFalwell%2Dbeing%2Ddefended%2Dby%2DACLUvia%2DFARK</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nj.com/newsflash/national/index.ssf?/cgi-free/getstory_ssf.cgi?a0607_BC_FalwellLawsuit-ACLU&amp;amp;&amp;amp;news&amp;amp;newsflash-national"&gt;Jerry Falwell being defended by ACLU.(via FARK)&lt;/a&gt; Now I&apos;ve heard everything. Now, I like Falwell about as much as the rest of you, but he may have a case. To give the ACLU their due, they always stand by their principles regardless of whose rights are being violated and whose political sensibilitie it might offend. I hope however, this will keep ol&apos; Jerry from villifying the group in his sermons from here on out.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.12729</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2001 10:43:25 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>aclu</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>falwell</category>
		<category>jerryfalwell</category>
		<dc:creator>jonmc</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The ACLU has been taken over by psychopathic haters in Hawaii.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/8569/The%2DACLU%2Dhas%2Dbeen%2Dtaken%2Dover%2Dby%2Dpsychopathic%2Dhaters%2Din%2DHawaii</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.honoluluweekly.com/features/politics.html"&gt;The ACLU has been taken over by psychopathic haters in Hawaii.&lt;/a&gt; The First Amendment Conference subcommittee of the state board had planned to invite Clarence Thomas to a public debate with ACLU national president Nadine Strossen, as part of a regular series of such debates that has included many big-name conservatives, including Antonin Scalia. But when certain members of the main state board found out, they flew into a rage and demanded the invitation be recinded. Just SOME of the reasons why these three ACLU board members members, all black, are refusing to allow Thomas to participate (note that these are all direct quotes, publicly stated by state ACLU board members): He is an an Anti-Christ. He is an Uncle Tom. He is an asshole. He is a Hitler. He is a Goebbels. And worst of all, he &lt;b&gt;married a white girl&lt;/b&gt;. When the ACLU starts to violently attack freedom of speech and freedom of thought, where else can we turn?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.8569</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2001 06:09:32 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>ACLU</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>ClarenceThomas</category>
		<category>debate</category>
		<category>Hawaii</category>
		<dc:creator>aaron</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The ACLU wants to protect your privacy</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/7015/The%2DACLU%2Dwants%2Dto%2Dprotect%2Dyour%2Dprivacy</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/nf/20010411/tc/8898_1.html"&gt;The ACLU wants to protect your privacy&lt;/a&gt; from government electronic surveillance programs like Echelon and Carnivore. Their &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.aclu.org/privacyrights/&quot;&gt;full page ad&lt;/a&gt; in today&apos;s NYT claims &lt;a href=&quot;http://memory.loc.gov/const/bor.html&quot;&gt;4th amendment&lt;/a&gt; rights are being violated by the US government, which is overstepping their bounds, and nearly free of up-to-date laws. Is it to late or can anything be done to protect civilian electronic communication?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.7015</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2001 07:55:16 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>4thAmendment</category>
		<category>ACLU</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>Carnivore</category>
		<category>eavesdropping</category>
		<category>Echelon</category>
		<category>ElectronicSurveillance</category>
		<category>espionage</category>
		<category>FourthAmendment</category>
		<category>NYTimes</category>
		<category>privacy</category>
		<category>surveillance</category>
		<dc:creator>mathowie</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Judge oks McVeigh execution request&lt;br&gt;</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/4980/Judge%2Doks%2DMcVeigh%2Dexecution%2Drequest</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://accessnorthga.com/news/newfullstory.asp?ID=19054"&gt;Judge oks McVeigh execution request&lt;br&gt;&lt;/a&gt; I understand the ACLU is fighting to keep him alive, but I cannot find a link.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.4980</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2000 12:51:32 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>ACLU</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>CapitalPunishment</category>
		<category>DeathPenalty</category>
		<category>execution</category>
		<category>McVeigh</category>
		<category>OklahomaCity</category>
		<category>OklahomaCityBombing</category>
		<category>TimMcVeigh</category>
		<category>TimothyMcVeigh</category>
		<dc:creator>thirteen</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>&quot;I think the secretary of state is clamping down on pure political speech,&quot; </title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/4008/I%2Dthink%2Dthe%2Dsecretary%2Dof%2Dstate%2Dis%2Dclamping%2Ddown%2Don%2Dpure%2Dpolitical%2Dspeech</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://yahoo.cnet.com/news/0-1005-200-3365122.html"&gt;&quot;I think the secretary of state is clamping down on pure political speech,&quot; &lt;/a&gt; says the ACLU, as they gear up to try to reopen &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.voteswap2000.com&quot;&gt;Voteswap2000&lt;/a&gt; and other vote-swapping sites.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.4008</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2000 12:01:09 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>2000</category>
		<category>ACLU</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>election</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>VoteSwap</category>
		<category>voting</category>
		<dc:creator>snarkout</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


