<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with ads and computers</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/ads+computers</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'ads' and 'computers' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2004 23:31:36 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 May 2004 23:31:36 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Do Be Evil</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/33064/Do%2DBe%2DEvil</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2004/05/13/technology/13goog.html?pagewanted=print&amp;amp;position="&gt;Google To Start Selling Banner Adverts&lt;/a&gt; From the that-didn&apos;t-take-too-long-department, Google&apos;s ad sales VP Tim Armstrong says Google will now start selling graphical banner adverts. One concession to their old mores is that, for now, the banner adverts will only appear on affiliated websites running their &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.google.com/adsense/&quot;&gt;AdSense&lt;/a&gt; referral program (as does MeFi), and there is an opt-out. However... &lt;i&gt;&quot;We have no plans to show images on Google.com&quot;&lt;/i&gt;, said Mr. Armstrong &lt;i&gt;&quot;but we are not opposed to it&quot;&lt;/i&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.33064</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2004 23:31:36 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>ads</category>
		<category>adsense</category>
		<category>advertisements</category>
		<category>advertising</category>
		<category>adverts</category>
		<category>banner</category>
		<category>computers</category>
		<category>google</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>marketing</category>
		<category>timarmstrong</category>
		<dc:creator>meehawl</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/8024/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://q.queso.com/2001/06/02"&gt;Woohoo!&lt;/a&gt; Follow the link to a post at the beloved-by-all-metafilterians &lt;a href=&quot;http://q.queso.com&quot;&gt;Jason Levine&lt;/a&gt;.
&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
read the fourth paragraph: it seems that i&apos;m not the only one highly ticked off by the recent slew of x10 pop-under ads.
&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Jason has kindly provided links that will set cookies to prevent them from appearing for 30 days, 1 year or 10 years.
&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
I modified the url yet again to keep it from popping up ever again &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.x10.com/home/optout.cgi?DAY=999999&amp;PAGE=http://www.x10.com/x10ads1.htm&quot;&gt;within my lifetime&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.8024</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2001 20:33:05 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>ads</category>
		<category>advertising</category>
		<category>computers</category>
		<category>cookies</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>JasonLevine</category>
		<category>popunders</category>
		<category>x10</category>
		<dc:creator>o2b</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/6054/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://64.87.36.179/movie.html"&gt;Cyber Soap&lt;/a&gt; PC World is trying to sell magazines, but could it also be entertaining?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.6054</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2001 22:13:03 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>ads</category>
		<category>advertising</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>computers</category>
		<category>magazine</category>
		<category>PCWorld</category>
		<dc:creator>owillis</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/5096/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.metafilter.com/comments.mefi/5021"&gt;Maybe I spoke too soon.&lt;/a&gt; A lot of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.hardocp.com/&quot;&gt;semipro&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tech-report.com&quot;&gt;tech-zines&lt;/a&gt;, sort of like blogs except with &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.2cpu.com/&quot;&gt;specific&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.3dchipset.com&quot;&gt;subject&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nvnews.net/&quot;&gt;matters&lt;/a&gt; to cover, are financed by ad networks. In the recent past a bunch of them have &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tech-report.com/news_reply.x/1730/&quot;&gt;lost their funding&lt;/a&gt; when their ad networks went out of business. Now one of the biggest networks which remains is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tech-report.com/news_reply.x/1730/&quot;&gt;changing their terms&lt;/a&gt; to the detriment of the web sites. I gather that a lot of the ad networks were running at a loss, and of course new funding has dried up. [more inside]  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.5096</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2001 19:12:01 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>ads</category>
		<category>advertising</category>
		<category>CNet</category>
		<category>computers</category>
		<category>funding</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>revenue</category>
		<category>technology</category>
		<category>zines</category>
		<dc:creator>Steven Den Beste</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


