<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with ads and election</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/ads+election</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'ads' and 'election' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 20:44:51 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 20:44:51 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Aint no party like the San Francisco values party!</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/71958/Aint%2Dno%2Dparty%2Dlike%2Dthe%2DSan%2DFrancisco%2Dvalues%2Dparty</link>
		<description> Beware the &lt;a href=&apos;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5eipRbIwNuA&apos;&gt;San Francisco values&lt;/a&gt;! (A little &lt;a href=&apos;http://blogs.kansascity.com/tvbarn/2008/05/its-the-kay-bar.html&apos;&gt;detail&lt;/a&gt; and Barnes&apos; &lt;a href=&apos;http://www.salon.com/politics/war_room/2008/05/21/san_fran/index.html&apos;&gt;response&lt;/a&gt;.) </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.71958</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 20:44:51 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>ads</category>
		<category>election</category>
		<category>missouri</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>tv</category>
		<dc:creator>serazin</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Make your own attack ad</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/66957/Make%2Dyour%2Down%2Dattack%2Dad</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.democrats.org/page/content/FlipperTV/"&gt;Make your own attack ad.&lt;/a&gt; The Democratic party is uploading all its &quot;tracker&quot; videos of the top Republican candidates out on the campaign trail, for use by anyone for anything. &quot;The party hopes that thousands of eyes might find something the mainstream media has missed, or that a new way of juxtaposing the video with something else will be revealing about the candidates,&quot; says &lt;a href=&quot;http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/11/27/democrats-supply-the-video-you-make-the-ads/&quot;&gt;the NYT&lt;/a&gt;. Gimmick or political sea change?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.66957</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 07:46:38 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>ads</category>
		<category>attackads</category>
		<category>campaigning</category>
		<category>democrats</category>
		<category>DIY</category>
		<category>dnc</category>
		<category>election</category>
		<category>election2008</category>
		<category>oppo</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>tracking</category>
		<category>video</category>
		<dc:creator>CunningLinguist</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/3976/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.msnbc.com/news/483645.asp"&gt;Nader&apos;s new television ad&lt;/a&gt; parodies those hilarious monster.com ads with the little kids hoping they&apos;ll grow up to have crappy jobs.  In the Nader ad, the kids hope they&apos;ll grow up to have the same crappy politicians, sold out to corporations, with no real change.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.3976</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2000 14:12:21 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>2000</category>
		<category>ads</category>
		<category>advertising</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>campaign</category>
		<category>election</category>
		<category>Nader</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>RalphNader</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<dc:creator>daveadams</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/2427/</link>
		<description> &lt;b&gt;Speaking of artists&apos; rights,&lt;/b&gt; one of the less obvious front lines in that war is the current &lt;a href=&quot;http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/nm/20000711/en/industry-actors_45.html&quot;&gt;Actors&apos; strike against ad agencies&lt;/a&gt; (yep, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/detail.cfm?link_ID=2421#12532&quot;&gt;Zach&lt;/a&gt;, it&apos;s still on), where the union is insisting on extending the concept of Residuals to cable TV and the web, while advertisers want to do away with residual payments altogether.  The unlikely union leader in this battle is &lt;a href=&quot;http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/nm/20000629/re/actors_daniels_dc_1.html&quot;&gt;America&apos;s answer to David Tomlinson&lt;/a&gt;, and now drawn into the fight is &lt;a href=&quot;http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/nm/20000709/en/industry-actors_44.html&quot;&gt;a certain Presidential candidate who&apos;s putting non-union &quot;real folks&quot; in his ads&lt;/a&gt;.  And if you don&apos;t think this is a pivotal battle, &lt;a href=&quot;http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/nm/20000709/en/industry-writers_2.html&quot;&gt;Hollywood&apos;s writers do&lt;/a&gt;. 
 </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.2427</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2000 13:04:48 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>actors</category>
		<category>ads</category>
		<category>advertisers</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>DavidTomlinson</category>
		<category>election</category>
		<category>residuals</category>
		<category>SAG</category>
		<category>strike</category>
		<dc:creator>wendell</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


