<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with adwords</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/adwords</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'adwords' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2005 06:07:45 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2005 06:07:45 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Google Click Fraud</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/43192/Google%2DClick%2DFraud</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/06/30/google_click_fraud_lawsuit/"&gt;Google sued&lt;/a&gt; by Click Defense for click fraud. Earlier &lt;a href=&quot;http://asia.cnet.com/news/personaltech/0,39037091,39202285,00.htm&quot;&gt;Google  had sued&lt;/a&gt; Auction Experts for click fraud. Meanwhile Google shows &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.softpedia.com/news/Google-has-with-600-more-profits-than-last-year-1417.shtml&quot;&gt;profits up 600%&lt;/a&gt; and its shares &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/06/28/AR2005062800898.html&quot;&gt;cross $300&lt;/a&gt;. Will Google &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/42724&quot;&gt;eat itself&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.clickz.com/experts/search/strat/article.php/3483981&quot;&gt;What is Click Fraud&lt;/a&gt; and how to fight it.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.43192</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2005 06:07:45 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>adsense</category>
		<category>adwords</category>
		<category>google</category>
		<dc:creator>webmeta</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Top Google Ads</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/41157/Top%2DGoogle%2DAds</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://random9.com/Googlest-site/index.htm&quot; title=&quot;List of most expensive Google AdWords&quot;&gt;This is a story&lt;/a&gt; about some yahoo who registered several domains to spread his story about developing Peritoneal Mesothelioma after having Laser Hair Removal in Washington DC. For some reason he thought Wisconsin Lemon Laws were in his favor and he&apos;d soon get a huge settlement paid with Best Buy gift cards. It turns out he should have had temporary medical insurance. Now he is looking for a Personal Injury Solicitor.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.41157</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2005 05:58:52 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>adsense</category>
		<category>adwords</category>
		<category>google</category>
		<category>googlest.com</category>
		<category>keywords</category>
		<category>ppc</category>
		<category>textads</category>
		<dc:creator>Mick</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>SocioEconomics of GoogleAds</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/35978/SocioEconomics%2Dof%2DGoogleAds</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethan/2004/10/01#a372"&gt;The Price of/for Attention&lt;/a&gt; &lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;While it&apos;s interesting (and soul-crushingly depressing) to discover bidding wars over keywords associated with human suffering, I&apos;m focused on the idea that I can pull data about web users&apos; interest in different subjects out of this data.&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

The fight to get attention on humanitarian crises, the dynamics of web browsing, and something like statistical game theory meet for a greased wrestling match in GoogleAds.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.35978</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2004 14:48:07 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>adwords</category>
		<category>attention</category>
		<category>economics</category>
		<category>humanitarian</category>
		<category>web</category>
		<dc:creator>freebird</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>First, do no evil...unless it costs us money</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/28718/First%2Ddo%2Dno%2Devilunless%2Dit%2Dcosts%2Dus%2Dmoney</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/6/33180.html"&gt;Sorry Matt, you can&apos;t post in this thread.&lt;/a&gt; Google changes its Adsense agreement so that anyone participating in the program is barred from talking about the program. First rule of Adsense, there is no Adsense.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.28718</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2003 09:46:18 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>ads</category>
		<category>adsense</category>
		<category>advertising</category>
		<category>adwords</category>
		<category>bloggers</category>
		<category>blogging</category>
		<category>blogs</category>
		<category>clickthroughs</category>
		<category>confidentiality</category>
		<category>contracts</category>
		<category>erikthauvin</category>
		<category>google</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>online</category>
		<category>termsofservice</category>
		<category>thauvin</category>
		<dc:creator>Mick</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/16141/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://news.com.com/2100-1023-876861.html"&gt;Overture sues Google over ad &quot;technology,&quot;&lt;/a&gt; saying Overture invented and has patented pay-for-placement on search engines, and Google&apos;s AdWords infringes on that. That strikes me as totally nuts -- how are Google ads paid search engine placement in anything but the very broadest terms? Are MeFi&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/textads.mefi&quot;&gt;TextAds&lt;/a&gt; next? &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pyrads.com/index.jsp&quot;&gt;PyRads&lt;/a&gt;?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.16141</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Apr 2002 09:40:21 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>ads</category>
		<category>adwords</category>
		<category>google</category>
		<category>lawsuits</category>
		<category>legal</category>
		<category>overture</category>
		<dc:creator>brookish</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/15845/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.microcontentnews.com/articles/googleround3.htm"&gt;Google rejects AdWords critical of Scientology.&lt;/a&gt; I hate this topic but I can&apos;t leave it alone. Google is being accused of being overly cautious in all its dealings with Scientology. A Google rep is quoted to say that they are under no pressure from Scientology to reject the ads. (more inside)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.15845</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2002 07:07:53 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>adwords</category>
		<category>google</category>
		<category>scientology</category>
		<dc:creator>maudlin</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/3545/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://ads.google.com/AdWords/Welcome.html"&gt;Google expands advertising options...&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;i&gt;still&lt;/i&gt; doesn&apos;t appear to have blown their rep.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.3545</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2000 16:09:55 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>adwords</category>
		<category>google</category>
		<category>launches</category>
		<dc:creator>baylink</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


