<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with airplanes and concorde</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/airplanes+concorde</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'airplanes' and 'concorde' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2003 23:00:10 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2003 23:00:10 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>caviar at mach 2 no more</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/29140/caviar%2Dat%2Dmach%2D2%2Dno%2Dmore</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.concordesst.com"&gt;Concorde&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=http://www.britishairways.com/concorde/aboutconcorde.html&gt;ends today&lt;/a&gt;.
So &lt;a href=http://142.26.194.131/aerodynamics1/High-Speed/default.htm&gt;what will it take&lt;/a&gt; to go commercially supersonic again?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.29140</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2003 23:00:10 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>aeroplanes</category>
		<category>airplanes</category>
		<category>aviation</category>
		<category>concorde</category>
		<category>flight</category>
		<category>supersonic</category>
		<dc:creator>casarkos</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Bye Bye Concorde</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/25003/Bye%2DBye%2DConcorde</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/airlines/story/0,1371,933655,00.html"&gt;The Queen of the Skies retires&lt;/a&gt; Undoubtedly the most &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.airliners.net/open.file/303613/M/&quot;&gt;elegant&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.airliners.net/open.file/293801/M/&quot;&gt;plane&lt;/a&gt; out there, Concorde is being put into retirement, some say too early. She flies over my office every morning and it&apos;s a beautiful sight. I feel very sad - is it normal to miss a machine?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.25003</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2003 01:45:16 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>airplanes</category>
		<category>airtravel</category>
		<category>concorde</category>
		<category>sst</category>
		<category>supersonic</category>
		<dc:creator>jontyjago</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Farewell Concorde?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/23869/Farewell%2DConcorde</link>
		<description> The thought of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.concordesst.com/&quot;&gt;Concorde&lt;/a&gt; services &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/2800519.stm&quot;&gt;ending&lt;/a&gt; saddens me ( possibly because &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.iwm.org.uk/duxford/brit16.htm&quot;&gt;101&lt;/a&gt; sits less than half a mile from my doorstep). It [with it&apos;
s clone &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.concorde-jet.com/e_tu_144.htm&quot;&gt;Concordeski&lt;/a&gt;] was the only supersonic passenger jet to even make it to prototype status. Considering things like it&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.britishairways.com/flights/factfile/airfleet/docs/conc.shtml&quot;&gt;massive fuel consumption&lt;/a&gt;, should we ditch the beast, find something else or go back to subsonics?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.23869</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Feb 2003 04:47:10 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>airlines</category>
		<category>airplanes</category>
		<category>britishairways</category>
		<category>concorde</category>
		<category>flight</category>
		<dc:creator>twine42</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/11698/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.boston.com/news/daily/22/concorde.htm"&gt;The Concorde Flies Again&lt;/a&gt; After an overhaul of the supersonic jet&apos;s safety features (after the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/comments.mefi/2604&quot;&gt;July 25 crash near Paris&lt;/a&gt;), British Airways&apos; Concorde undertook it&apos;s first trans-Atlantic flight to New York.

British Airways has also set up a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.britishairways.com/concorde/index.html&quot;&gt;Concorde&apos;s Return To Service&lt;/a&gt; mini-site...  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.11698</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2001 06:50:11 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>airlines</category>
		<category>airplanes</category>
		<category>britishairways</category>
		<category>concorde</category>
		<category>travel</category>
		<dc:creator>tpl1212</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/2604/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://cbc.ca/cgi-bin/templates/NWview.cgi?/news/2000/07/25/concorde000725"&gt;Concorde crashes near Paris.&lt;/a&gt; Oh, no.  Not again...  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.2604</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2000 08:53:16 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>airplanes</category>
		<category>concorde</category>
		<category>crash</category>
		<category>disaster</category>
		<category>france</category>
		<category>paris</category>
		<dc:creator>iceberg273</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


