<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with airwaves</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/airwaves</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'airwaves' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2003 11:37:47 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2003 11:37:47 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Effing C.C.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/28821/Effing%2DCC</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.cnn.com/2003/SHOWBIZ/Music/10/07/bono.fcc.ap/"&gt;This is really, really f------ brilliant.&lt;/a&gt; The &lt;a href=&quot;http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3045A1.pdf&quot;&gt;FCC says &lt;/a&gt;the f-word is OK on network TV, as long as it doesn&apos;t refer to the sexual act. Naturally, &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.parentstv.org/actionalert/actiongoldenglobes.asp&quot;&gt;some groups &lt;/a&gt; don&apos;t like dirty talk. Is this a sea change in the level of discourse, or is the FCC finally acknowledging that it&apos;s useless to protect kids from &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.snopes.com/language/acronyms/fuck.htm&quot;&gt;our favorite four-letter word? &lt;/a&gt;
(Second link is a .pdf file.)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.28821</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2003 11:37:47 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>airwaves</category>
		<category>broadcast</category>
		<category>fcc</category>
		<category>federalcommunicationscommission</category>
		<category>freespeech</category>
		<category>fuck</category>
		<category>fword</category>
		<category>f-word</category>
		<dc:creator>sixpack</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/7474/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.clearchannel.com/radio/stationsearch.html"&gt;Find out how many radio stations in your area are owned by the same company. &lt;/a&gt; Here in Dallas Texas &lt;B&gt;Clear Channel&lt;/B&gt; owns six.  Then there&apos;s four other radio stations owned by &lt;A HREF=&quot;http://www.dfwradio.com&quot;&gt;Susquehanna Radio&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/A&gt; which used to be owned by AM/FM Incorporated but they merged with *guess who* Clear Channel last year. So it looks like Clear Channel either directly or indirectly controls almost a dozen radio stations in north Texas alone. How much control do they have over your airwaves? Ever wonder why radio stations all &lt;I&gt;sound&lt;/I&gt; the same? Cuz they &lt;I&gt;ARE&lt;/I&gt; the same!  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.7474</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2001 04:21:07 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>airwaves</category>
		<category>broadcasting</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>clearchannel</category>
		<category>infinity</category>
		<category>radio</category>
		<category>radiostations</category>
		<category>susquehanna</category>
		<dc:creator>ZachsMind</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


