<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with algore and USPolitics</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/algore+USPolitics</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'algore' and 'USPolitics' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2003 02:17:02 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2003 02:17:02 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Attack of the Gores.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/27544/Attack%2Dof%2Dthe%2DGores</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.moveon.org/gore-speech.html"&gt;Al Gore calls the Bush administration on their lies, says he won&apos;t run but will pick a candidate in the near future.&lt;/a&gt; Insightful excerpt: &quot;Robust debate in a democracy will almost always involve occasional rhetorical excesses and leaps of faith, and we&apos;re all used to that. I&apos;ve even been guilty of it myself on occasion. But there is a big difference between that and a systematic effort to manipulate facts in service to a totalistic ideology that is felt to be more important than the mandates of basic honesty.&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.27544</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2003 02:17:02 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>AlGore</category>
		<category>americanpolitics</category>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>democracy</category>
		<category>GeorgeWBush</category>
		<category>Gore</category>
		<category>GWB</category>
		<category>presidentbush</category>
		<category>USpolitics</category>
		<dc:creator>skallas</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/18721/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A4054-2002Jul26.html"&gt;Gore questions timing of Iraq concern&lt;/a&gt; Is it proper to invade Iraq?  This would be an unprecedented move for the US military as Iraq has not attacked the US anyone the US has defense treaties with. 
&quot;Republican National Committee spokesman Jim Dyke called Gore&apos;s comments &quot;irresponsible.&quot;
&quot;This is no time to attack the president or Republicans for their handling of the war for political gain,&quot; he said.&quot;

Hmmm..so he admits the Iraqi attack IS for partisan political gain, eh?  I would have never suspected it.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.18721</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jul 2002 11:16:29 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>AlGore</category>
		<category>americanpolitics</category>
		<category>GOP</category>
		<category>Gore</category>
		<category>invasion</category>
		<category>iraq</category>
		<category>iraqwar</category>
		<category>middleast</category>
		<category>mideast</category>
		<category>occupation</category>
		<category>republicans</category>
		<category>RNC</category>
		<category>UN</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>USpolitics</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<dc:creator>nofundy</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/8641/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.poppolitics.com/articles/2001-06-26-newdemocrats.shtml"&gt;New Democrats or Old?&lt;/a&gt; On one hand you have the New Democrats (Clinton, Gore), who&apos;s agendas are more centrist (some would say right leaning) but have had victories (Clinton being elected twice). On the other hand, the more liberal wings  seem to say that it&apos;s better to stand on principle and convince the populace to come over to your side.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.8641</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2001 13:10:28 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>AlGore</category>
		<category>BillClinton</category>
		<category>centrism</category>
		<category>centrist</category>
		<category>DemocraticParty</category>
		<category>Democrats</category>
		<category>LeftWing</category>
		<category>liberal</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>PopPolitics</category>
		<category>USPolitics</category>
		<dc:creator>owillis</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/4870/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/nm/20001217/ts/election_oconnor_dc_1.html"&gt;Justice O&apos;Connor said &apos;&apos;this is terrible,&apos;&apos; when it looked like Gore had won the election&lt;/a&gt; But of course, politics played no role in her decision to hand the election to Bush.  Right?  right?  ?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.4870</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2000 07:18:03 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>AlGore</category>
		<category>bias</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>Election2000</category>
		<category>GeorgeWBush</category>
		<category>SandraDayOConnor</category>
		<category>SupremeCourt</category>
		<category>USPolitics</category>
		<category>USPresident</category>
		<category>Yahoo</category>
		<dc:creator>Outlawyr</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/4478/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.eng.us.uu.net/staff/stripes/amusement/trial-by-combat.html"&gt;Trial By Combat&lt;/a&gt;  - Since it seems that neither counting the votes nor suing in court is going settle this election. I suggest taking a more direct and final approach. A fight to the death with broadswords.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.4478</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2000 10:11:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>algore</category>
		<category>election2000</category>
		<category>florida</category>
		<category>georgewbush</category>
		<category>gwb</category>
		<category>uselections</category>
		<category>uspolitics</category>
		<dc:creator>y6y6y6</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/4149/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://foxnews.com/fn99/elections/florida_recount.html"&gt;80% of newly found votes in the recount are for Gore.&lt;/a&gt; So either the inital vote count was biased for Bush, or the recount - which is being much more closely watched - is biased for Gore. (Or it&apos;s just a funny coincidence. Also, monkeys might fly out of my ass.)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.4149</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2000 11:00:16 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>AlGore</category>
		<category>Election2000</category>
		<category>Florida</category>
		<category>recount</category>
		<category>USPolitics</category>
		<category>USPresident</category>
		<dc:creator>nicwolff</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/3866/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nadertrader.org"&gt;Be a Nader Trader!&lt;/a&gt; This site puts American University law professor &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wcl.american.edu/faculty/raskin/index.html&quot;&gt;Jamin Raskin&lt;/a&gt;&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://slate.msn.com/Concept/00-10-24/Concept.asp&quot;&gt;theory into practice&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.3866</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2000 10:29:34 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>AlGore</category>
		<category>Election2000</category>
		<category>NaderTrader</category>
		<category>RalphNader</category>
		<category>USPolitics</category>
		<category>VoteTrading</category>
		<dc:creator>bkdelong</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/2754/</link>
		<description> &lt;A href=&quot;http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/ap/20000807/ts/gore_veepstakes.html&quot;&gt;Al Gore has decided on Sen. Joseph Lieberman (D-CT) as his VP nominee,&lt;/a&gt; sez someone who ratted to the AP. I suppose there&apos;s a small chance they&apos;re just leaking this now to test public and media reaction before making a final fianl decision, but I doubt it.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.2754</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Aug 2000 05:33:30 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>2000campaign</category>
		<category>2000elex</category>
		<category>algore</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>elections</category>
		<category>gore</category>
		<category>holy</category>
		<category>holyjoe</category>
		<category>jewish</category>
		<category>jews</category>
		<category>joelieberman</category>
		<category>lieberman</category>
		<category>newsfilter</category>
		<category>politicians</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>president</category>
		<category>presidential</category>
		<category>uspolitics</category>
		<category>veep</category>
		<category>vicepresident</category>
		<dc:creator>aaron</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


