<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with alistapart</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/alistapart</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'alistapart' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 07:52:09 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 07:52:09 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Regaining Your Balance</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/81967/Regaining%2DYour%2DBalance</link>
		<description> &lt;em&gt;&quot;Web professionals are often expected to be &#8220;always on&#8221;&#8212;always working, absorbing information, and honing new skills. Unless our work and personal lives are carefully balanced, however, the physical and mental effects of an &quot;always on&quot; life can be debilitating.&quot;&lt;/em&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.alistapart.com/articles/burnout/&quot;&gt;Burnout: Running On Empty&lt;/a&gt; By &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.scottboms.com/&quot;&gt;Scott Boms&lt;/a&gt; </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.81967</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 07:52:09 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>alistapart</category>
		<category>balance</category>
		<category>behavior</category>
		<category>boundaries</category>
		<category>burnout</category>
		<category>communication</category>
		<category>depression</category>
		<category>exhaustion</category>
		<category>expectations</category>
		<category>focus</category>
		<category>goals</category>
		<category>illness</category>
		<category>measures</category>
		<category>process</category>
		<category>routine</category>
		<category>scottboms</category>
		<category>sleep</category>
		<category>stress</category>
		<category>values</category>
		<category>work</category>
		<dc:creator>netbros</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>X-IE-VERSION-FREEZE</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/68707/XIEVERSIONFREEZE</link>
		<description> It slipped through the cracks on my radar, but apparently the &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.msdn.com/ie/archive/2008/01/21/compatibility-and-ie8.aspx&quot;&gt;IE8 team&lt;/a&gt; has met with some &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.alistapart.com/articles/beyonddoctype/&quot;&gt;web standards gurus&lt;/a&gt; and decided that in order to move forward with full standards compliance (and support the known quirks of IE6/7 for corporate intranets), a new &quot;version targeting&quot; system should be put in place. Other &lt;a href=&quot;http://weblogs.mozillazine.org/roc/archives/2008/01/post_2.html&quot;&gt;browser&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://webkit.org/blog/155/versioning-compatibility-and-standards/&quot;&gt;vendors&lt;/a&gt; are not amused. Should IE &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.isolani.co.uk/blog/standards/EndOfLineInternetExplorer&quot;&gt;just give up?&lt;/a&gt; There&apos;s a whole lot more &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.digital-web.com/news/2008/01/IE8_Version_Targeting_causes_quite_a_stir&quot;&gt;commentary round-up over here&lt;/a&gt;. Highlights : &lt;a href=&quot;http://ejohn.org/blog/meta-madness/&quot;&gt;John &quot;JQuery&quot; Resig sees too many problems&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.b-list.org/weblog/2008/jan/23/legacy/&quot;&gt;James Bennett gives an overview&lt;/a&gt;,  &lt;a href=&quot;http://ln.hixie.ch/?start=1201080691&amp;count=1&quot;&gt;Hixie thinks it&apos;s anti-competitive&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.katemonkey.co.uk/article/48/x-ua-lemur-compatible&quot;&gt;toy lemurs act out the controversy&lt;/a&gt;.

See also the &lt;a href=&quot;http://weblogs.mozillazine.org/roc/archives/2008/01/slipping_the_ba.html&quot;&gt;two&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://weblogs.mozillazine.org/roc/archives/2008/01/different_appro.html&quot;&gt;follow-up&lt;/a&gt; posts from Mozilla developer Robert O&apos;Callahan on why their team doesn&apos;t suffer the same issues. </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.68707</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 11:43:04 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>alistapart</category>
		<category>future</category>
		<category>html5</category>
		<category>IE8</category>
		<category>ieteam</category>
		<category>internetexplorer</category>
		<category>standards</category>
		<category>webtechnologies</category>
		<dc:creator>revmitcz</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>So what is web design?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/66754/So%2Dwhat%2Dis%2Dweb%2Ddesign</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.alistapart.com/articles/understandingwebdesign"&gt;Jeffrey Zeldman on what web design is and isn&apos;t.&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.66754</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 07:41:29 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>alistapart</category>
		<category>design</category>
		<category>webdesign</category>
		<category>zeldman</category>
		<dc:creator>Brandon Blatcher</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>No good deed goes unpunished</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/22940/No%2Dgood%2Ddeed%2Dgoes%2Dunpunished</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.devarticles.com"&gt;Dev Articles is the latest in a line of thieves&lt;/a&gt; who steal from free publications such as &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.alistapart.com&quot;&gt;A List Apart&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.digital-web.com&quot;&gt;Digital-Web &lt;/a&gt;and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.boxesandarrows.com&quot;&gt;Boxes and Arrows&lt;/a&gt; to pilfer content and make a buck off of other folks&apos; generous efforts. What is wrong with these folks? Dev Articles at least credits the authors (without letting them know... even that their stolen photo is up) but not the publication that provided the edits, formatting and forum to make the article real. And they make the advertising buck. 

This month alone &lt;a href=&quot;http://digital-web.com&quot;&gt;Nick Finck&lt;/a&gt; has had to stop &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.morphoses.com&quot;&gt;Morpheous &lt;/a&gt;from their theft of &lt;b&gt;7&lt;/b&gt; of his articles (and they claimed authorship!) What is wrong with people?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.22940</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jan 2003 20:56:04 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>alistapart</category>
		<category>boxesandarrows</category>
		<category>content</category>
		<category>contenttheft</category>
		<category>devarticles</category>
		<category>digitalweb</category>
		<category>morpheous</category>
		<category>nickfinck</category>
		<category>plagiarism</category>
		<dc:creator>christina</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/2473/</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.alistapart.com/stories/fame/&quot;&gt;Oh great another &quot;weblogs are stupid and they all suck&quot; article&lt;/a&gt; came out, but what I really want to know is: why does &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.alistapart.com/stories/why/&quot;&gt;the other article&lt;/a&gt; running this week at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.alistapart.com/&quot;&gt;ALA&lt;/a&gt; acknowledge that &quot;99% of everything is crap,&quot; but the weblog article doesn&apos;t? Comparing the cruft at the bottom of weblogs with the 1% best of writers (Ginsberg and Kerouac) seems unfair and pointless. And where are the solutions? Tell everyone to stop? Tell them to write better? What&apos;s so hard about ignoring the sites you don&apos;t like instead (I do that with most advertising)?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.2473</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2000 13:50:42 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>ala</category>
		<category>alistapart</category>
		<category>blogging</category>
		<category>blogs</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>rant</category>
		<dc:creator>mathowie</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/1257/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://alistapart.com/stories/dao/dao_1.html"&gt;Cool, cool, cool article&lt;/a&gt; over at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.alistapart.com/&quot;&gt;A List Apart.&lt;/a&gt; John Allsopp is my new hero . . . whoever he is.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.1257</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2000 23:59:02 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>AListApart</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>JohnAllsopp</category>
		<dc:creator>gleemax</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/621/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.alistapart.com/stories/bluegreen/"&gt;The article in this week&apos;s ALA about the allure of blue and green on the web&lt;/a&gt; should not concern nor cause alarm among the citizens of MetaFilter. MetaFilter is not in league with any corporate entity in a conspiracy to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.epinions.com/&quot;&gt;make a profit off your opinions&lt;/a&gt;. There are no attempts of gaining your trust with the hidden motive of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.doubleclick.com/&quot;&gt;making you more susceptible to efforts to sell you product&lt;/a&gt; here at MetaFilter. Please continue reading. That is all. [heads up from &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fairvue.com/&quot;&gt;Fairvue&lt;/a&gt;]  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.621</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Jan 2000 03:00:39 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>AListApart</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<dc:creator>jason</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/557/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.alistapart.com/stories/winners/index.html"&gt;A List Apart announced the winners&lt;/a&gt; of their design contest. There were no surprises here, when I first heard about the contest, there was one site that came to mind, and they won the grand prize. I was kind of surprised that I had seen all the award winning sites before in my own travels, but hadn&apos;t explored much of them. Especially &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eneri.net/&quot;&gt;Eneri.net&lt;/a&gt;, I had found it a couple months ago, but couldn&apos;t handle the long intros and preloads, it seemed grossly overdesigned and I left after seeing two pages and haven&apos;t been back since.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.557</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Jan 2000 21:24:51 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>alistapart</category>
		<category>awards</category>
		<category>designcontest</category>
		<category>eneri</category>
		<dc:creator>mathowie</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


