<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with americaonline</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/americaonline</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'americaonline' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2006 13:56:23 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2006 13:56:23 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Those Bastards!</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/53100/Those%2DBastards</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://consumerist.com/consumer/exclusive/aol-retention-manual-revealed-188005.php"&gt;Think of Cancellation Calls as Sales Leads!&lt;/a&gt; Why did &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/52285&quot;&gt;Vincent&lt;/a&gt; have such a hard time cancelling his AOL account? It turns out that his customer service rep was just following the AOL Retention Manual, a copy of which was sent to consumerist.com. Nicholas Graham, executive vice president of AOL Corporate Communications, had sent Vincent &lt;a href=&quot;http://insignificantthoughts.com/2006/06/20/aol-apologizes-officially/&quot;&gt;a formal apology&lt;/a&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://66.102.7.104/search?q=cache:niZjN21AYZYJ:insignificantthoughts.com/2006/06/20/aol-apologizes-officially/+%22aol+apologizes,+officially%22&amp;hl=en&amp;gl=us&amp;ct=clnk&amp;cd=1&amp;client=firefox-a&quot;&gt;Google cache&lt;/a&gt; - right now his site&apos;s been pummeled beyond capacity) saying, &lt;em&gt;&quot;The employee in question violated our customer service guidelines and practices, and everything that AOL believes to be important in customer care.&quot; &lt;/em&gt; Um...really? &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2006/07/02/business/yourmoney/02digi.html?ex=1309492800&amp;en=c30d6788c3f52be8&amp;ei=5090&amp;partner=rssuserland&amp;emc=rss&quot;&gt;New York Times article&lt;/a&gt; on the cancellation-call hoopla. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.digg.com&quot;&gt;via digg.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.53100</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2006 13:56:23 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>americaonline</category>
		<category>aol</category>
		<category>assholes</category>
		<dc:creator>granted</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Stamping Out Free Email</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/48879/Stamping%2DOut%2DFree%2DEmail</link>
		<description> When you really, &lt;i&gt;really&lt;/i&gt; want your email to arrive at its destination: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2006/02/05/technology/05AOL.html?hp&amp;ex=1139115600&amp;en=adc81ef8bbdf0746&amp;ei=5094&amp;partner=homepage &quot;&gt;now you gotta pay postage&lt;/a&gt;.  Another brilliant, forward-looking idea for monetizing-the-Internet&lt;sup&gt;&lt;small&gt;TM&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/sup&gt; from the wizards at AOL and Yahoo.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.48879</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2006 11:18:51 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>AmericaOnline</category>
		<category>AOL</category>
		<category>email</category>
		<category>mail</category>
		<category>newsfilter</category>
		<category>postage</category>
		<category>technology</category>
		<category>USPS</category>
		<category>Yahoo</category>
		<dc:creator>digaman</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The Two Faces of AOL and Microsoft&apos;s Spam Policies</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/25675/The%2DTwo%2DFaces%2Dof%2DAOL%2Dand%2DMicrosofts%2DSpam%2DPolicies</link>
		<description> Perhaps you&apos;ve seen the new MSN commercials that use M$&apos;s &quot;spam-blocking&quot; technology to support their ISP service. Maybe you&apos;ve read fluff pieces like &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn?pagename=article&amp;node=&amp;contentId=A37742-2003Feb20&amp;#0172;Found=true&quot;&gt;these&lt;/a&gt;, where AOL and Microsoft execs are allowed to wax poetic about their deep anti-spam convictions:

&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;&apos;I get spam too, and I am as fed up with it as all of our members are,&apos; AOL chief executive Jonathan F. Miller said yesterday.&quot; 

&quot;&apos;To help keep intruders at bay,&apos; Microsoft said, &quot;we must all do our part.&apos;&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;

So what&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bayarea.com/mld/mercurynews/news/local/5476163.htm&quot;&gt;&lt;i&gt;this&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/a&gt; all about?

&quot;&apos;AOL and Microsoft argue there is a place for legitimate unsolicited e-mail in the marketplace,&apos; said Marc Berejka, Microsoft&apos;s senior director of public policy.&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.25675</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2003 09:08:17 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>AmericaOnline</category>
		<category>AOL</category>
		<category>Email</category>
		<category>Internet</category>
		<category>ISP</category>
		<category>Microsoft</category>
		<category>Policy</category>
		<category>SPAM</category>
		<dc:creator>Pinwheel</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>AOL owns Instant Messaging?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/22403/AOL%2Downs%2DInstant%2DMessaging</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.msnbc.com/news/848770.asp?0dm=C14KT"&gt;AOL owns Instant Messaging?&lt;/a&gt;  - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.msnbc.com/&quot; new&gt;MSNBC&lt;/a&gt; is reporting that AOL&apos;s subsidary ICQ has &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.msnbc.com/news/848770.asp?0dm=C14KT&quot; new2&gt;received a patent for Instant Messaging&lt;/a&gt;.  I would have thought IRC was enough prior art to invalidate the claim, but the Patent Office knows best.  Can AOL put the genie back in the bottle?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.22403</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2002 09:06:30 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>americaonline</category>
		<category>aol</category>
		<category>icq</category>
		<category>im</category>
		<category>iming</category>
		<category>instantmessaging</category>
		<category>irc</category>
		<category>patentoffice</category>
		<category>patents</category>
		<dc:creator>Argyle</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/18845/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://reuters.com/news_article.jhtml;jsessionid=3KYMPYED0NDSSCRBAELCFEY?type=businessnews&amp;amp;StoryID=1277974"&gt;You&apos;ve got jail?  &lt;/a&gt; The SEC is no longer alone in investigating accounting irregularities at AOL Time Warner.  Tonight the &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.aoltimewarner.com/corporate_information/index.adp&quot;&gt;world&apos;s leading media and entertainment company&lt;/a&gt;&quot; confirmed that the U.S. Justice Dept. has opened its own probe.  This, one day after &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.boston.com/dailynews/211/economy/Bush_enacts_law_cracking_down_:.shtml&quot;&gt;President Bush signed&lt;/a&gt; the so-called Corporate and Auditing Accountability, Responsibility, and Transparency Act (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cof.org/government/legalservice/HR3763.pdf&quot;&gt;pdf &lt;/a&gt;of HR 3763) (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.icpas.org/icpas/ei/transparency-act.asp#Bullet%20Point%20Summary&quot;&gt;summary&lt;/a&gt;).  Tonight, however, lawmakers from both sides of the aisle, including Senators Patrick Leahy, D-Vt and Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa are criticizing the President for trying to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nandotimes.com/politics/story/484181p-3866621c.html&quot;&gt;weaken the corporate fraud bill&lt;/a&gt; before the ink is even dry.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.18845</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2002 20:44:16 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>accounting</category>
		<category>americaonline</category>
		<category>aol</category>
		<category>corporateaccounting</category>
		<category>corporatefraud</category>
		<category>departmentofjustice</category>
		<category>doj</category>
		<category>fraud</category>
		<category>sec</category>
		<category>usdoj</category>
		<dc:creator>found missing</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/16796/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.google.com/press/pressrel/aol.html"&gt;Google to Power AOL Search.&lt;/a&gt; America Online and Google today announced a multi-year agreement that will make Google&apos;s popular search technology and targeted paid listings available on America Online brands. Google&apos;s paid listings will begin rolling out on the AOL service and AOL.COM immediately; they will launch on Netscape and CompuServe in the next several weeks.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.16796</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2002 09:36:02 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>americaonline</category>
		<category>aol</category>
		<category>google</category>
		<dc:creator>ncurley</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/8590/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.msnbc.com/news/592002.asp"&gt;AOL membership tops 30 million.&lt;/a&gt; America Online continues to pad its lead as the largest Internet provider, hitting 30 million members &#8212; doubling its vast size in just two and a half years.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.8590</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2001 17:43:53 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>americaonline</category>
		<category>aol</category>
		<category>members</category>
		<dc:creator>Brilliantcrank</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


