<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with analytic</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/analytic</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'analytic' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2007 23:24:37 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2007 23:24:37 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>How many existentialists does it take to change a lightbulb?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/64173/How%2Dmany%2Dexistentialists%2Ddoes%2Dit%2Dtake%2Dto%2Dchange%2Da%2Dlightbulb</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.erraticimpact.com/"&gt;The Philosophy Research Base&lt;/a&gt; features thousands of annotated links and text resources for philosophy research on the Internet. Categorized by history, subject and author, this meta-index serves as both a study guide and a platform for a wide variety of community services for students and teachers in philosophy and related subjects.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.64173</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2007 23:24:37 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>analytic</category>
		<category>ancient</category>
		<category>angst</category>
		<category>dread</category>
		<category>feminism</category>
		<category>midieval</category>
		<category>modern</category>
		<category>music</category>
		<category>philosophy</category>
		<category>phobia</category>
		<category>political</category>
		<category>queertheory</category>
		<dc:creator>netbros</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Philosophy as practiced in most English-speaking philosophy departments today.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/54214/Philosophy%2Das%2Dpracticed%2Din%2Dmost%2DEnglishspeaking%2Dphilosophy%2Ddepartments%2Dtoday</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www-rcf.usc.edu/~soames/forthcoming_papers/Analytic_Philosophy_in_America.pdf"&gt;Long .pdf paper on the state of mainstream &quot;analytic&quot; philosophy.&lt;/a&gt; In a recent &lt;a href=&quot;http://ask.metafilter.com/mefi/44229&quot;&gt;thread&lt;/a&gt;, we discussed the current state of philosophy departments in English-speaking countries. Philosophers are often asked why we don&apos;t take Ayn Rand seriously as a philosopher, or why we aren&apos;t up on literary Theory or deconstruction, etc. The short answer is that most academic philosophers in universities in the English-speaking world are engaged in a broad consensus (about how to do philosophy, what counts as a good question, etc) that&apos;s called &quot;analytic philosophy&quot; for short. Here is a long, informative encyclopedia entry by Scott Soames describing the history and current state of play in analytic philosophy. If you want to understand the background of the currently dominant school of philosophy in the US, UK, Canada and Australia, this will explain it. Link goes directly to a 44-page .pdf file. 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Here are a few bonus bits: Jerry Fodor on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lrb.co.uk/v26/n20/fodo01_.html&quot;&gt;Why no one reads analytic philosophy&lt;/a&gt;. One of the Philosophy talk podcasts from the Stanford philosophy department, on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.philosophytalk.org/pastShows/FuturePhilosophy.html&quot;&gt;The Future of Philosophy&lt;/a&gt;. Some answers at askphilosophers.org  -- a site where you can ask questions directly of professional philosophers -- that say the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amherst.edu/askphilosophers/question/8&quot;&gt;distinction&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amherst.edu/askphilosophers/question/488&quot;&gt;between&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amherst.edu/askphilosophers/question/146&quot;&gt;analytic and continental philosophy &lt;/a&gt;should be retired. (In a way, I agree, but the terms are used so widely that it&apos;s useful to get a sense of what they&apos;re meant to describe.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy on what different philosophers have meant by &lt;a href=&quot;http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/analysis/&quot;&gt;&quot;analysis&quot;&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.54214</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2006 14:33:33 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>academic</category>
		<category>analytic</category>
		<category>analyticphilosophy</category>
		<category>continentalphilosophy</category>
		<category>philosopher</category>
		<category>philosophy</category>
		<category>professor</category>
		<category>ScottSoames</category>
		<category>university</category>
		<dc:creator>LobsterMitten</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Philosophy trivia and snacks</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/48971/Philosophy%2Dtrivia%2Dand%2Dsnacks</link>
		<description> Test your knowledge of philosophy with the &lt;a href=&quot;http://web.mit.edu/philos/www/triviaquiz06/&quot;&gt;2006 IAP Philosophy Trivia Quiz&lt;/a&gt;!  This quiz is extremely hard, so you might want to take a break at the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wjh.harvard.edu/%7Elombrozo/home/ShepardsTables.pdf&quot;&gt;Cognitive Science Cafe&lt;/a&gt; [pdf].  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.48971</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2006 16:27:51 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>analytic</category>
		<category>cognitive</category>
		<category>cogsci</category>
		<category>geekyhumour</category>
		<category>philosophy</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<category>trivia</category>
		<dc:creator>painquale</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Hypertextual antimony contra postmodernist discourse claims</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/46113/Hypertextual%2Dantimony%2Dcontra%2Dpostmodernist%2Ddiscourse%2Dclaims</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://bengal-ng.missouri.edu/~kvanvigj/certain_doubts/?p=453"&gt;Characterizing a Fogbank.&lt;/a&gt; A prominent analytic philosopher discusses whether postmodernism is worth taking seriously.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.46113</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2005 13:40:57 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>analytic</category>
		<category>bullshit</category>
		<category>derrida</category>
		<category>philosophy</category>
		<category>postmodern</category>
		<category>postmodernism</category>
		<dc:creator>painquale</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


