<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with aol and Yahoo</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/aol+Yahoo</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'aol' and 'Yahoo' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 03:52:09 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 03:52:09 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Search engine battle heats up</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/70906/Search%2Dengine%2Dbattle%2Dheats%2Dup</link>
		<description> According to ComScore, Google takes 59.8% of search traffic in the US, leaving Yahoo, MSN and smaller players to fight for the scraps. &lt;a href=&quot;http://searchengineland.com/080415-184858.php&quot;&gt;Pretty pie-chart here&lt;/a&gt;. Slightly different numbers are available from &lt;a href=&quot;http://searchengineland.com/080415-151201.php&quot;&gt;Compete &lt;/a&gt;and &lt;a href=&quot;http://searchengineland.com/080414-135322.php&quot;&gt;Hitwise&lt;/a&gt;, but Google still rules the roost.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.70906</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 03:52:09 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>aol</category>
		<category>google</category>
		<category>msn</category>
		<category>searchengine</category>
		<category>yahoo</category>
		<dc:creator>SharQ</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Stamping Out Free Email</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/48879/Stamping%2DOut%2DFree%2DEmail</link>
		<description> When you really, &lt;i&gt;really&lt;/i&gt; want your email to arrive at its destination: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2006/02/05/technology/05AOL.html?hp&amp;ex=1139115600&amp;en=adc81ef8bbdf0746&amp;ei=5094&amp;partner=homepage &quot;&gt;now you gotta pay postage&lt;/a&gt;.  Another brilliant, forward-looking idea for monetizing-the-Internet&lt;sup&gt;&lt;small&gt;TM&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/sup&gt; from the wizards at AOL and Yahoo.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.48879</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2006 11:18:51 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>AmericaOnline</category>
		<category>AOL</category>
		<category>email</category>
		<category>mail</category>
		<category>newsfilter</category>
		<category>postage</category>
		<category>technology</category>
		<category>USPS</category>
		<category>Yahoo</category>
		<dc:creator>digaman</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/14889/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/000/922dgmtd.asp"&gt;Corporate censorship in China&lt;/a&gt; (via slashdot). I guess censorship and collusion in the repression of people is okay if you&apos;re making profits for your shareholders. An eye-opening look into the way that corporations are helping to facilitate censorship on the Internet in China. AOL and Yahoo&apos;s attitudes to what I thought were universal human rights is nothing short of sickening.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.14889</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2002 21:07:25 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>aol</category>
		<category>censorship</category>
		<category>china</category>
		<category>EFF</category>
		<category>google</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>yahoo</category>
		<dc:creator>pixelgeek</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/5671/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://whois.registrar.aol.com/whois/whois.adp?name=aoltimewarneryahoo.com"&gt;WHOIS results for AOLTIMEWARNERYAHOO.COM...&lt;/a&gt; (via &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ntk.net/?back=2001/now0202.txt&quot;&gt;NTK&lt;/a&gt;)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.5671</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Feb 2001 16:57:06 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>aol</category>
		<category>domainnames</category>
		<category>mergers</category>
		<category>timewarner</category>
		<category>whois</category>
		<category>yahoo</category>
		<dc:creator>tregoweth</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/3077/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/nm/20000831/wr/quackdotcom_aol_dc_1.html"&gt;AOL Buys Quack.com That Enables Access with Voice&lt;/a&gt;  &#xa0; &lt;&#8212; this is the worst headline I have ever seen.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.3077</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2000 17:20:55 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>AOL</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>copywriting</category>
		<category>editing</category>
		<category>EditorialOversight</category>
		<category>headlines</category>
		<category>Quack.com</category>
		<category>Yahoo</category>
		<dc:creator>sylloge</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/2300/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://biz.yahoo.com/bw/000628/ca_yahoo.html"&gt;Yahoo-Groups!&lt;/a&gt; Yahoo! seems to be building itself into a virtual AOL.  I suppose they are going to grab a cable company or entertainment company next.  Hey - maybe Paramount&apos;s new owners will put it on the block.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.2300</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2000 07:09:36 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>aol</category>
		<category>communities</category>
		<category>groups</category>
		<category>yahoo</category>
		<dc:creator>rich</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


