<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with aol and internet</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/aol+internet</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'aol' and 'internet' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 15:29:21 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 15:29:21 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>about:mozilla</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/70392/aboutmozilla</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://home.mcom.com/&quot; title=&quot;Welcome to Mosaic Communications Corporation!&quot;&gt;Welcome to Mosaic Communications Corporation!&lt;/a&gt; It was 1994, and the World Wide Web as we know it today was about to be born. Mosaic Communications didn&apos;t invent the web and didn&apos;t even invent the graphical browser. The Netscape browser and Netscape server were instrumental in commercializing the internet. mcom.com was one of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://home.mcom.com/home/internet-directory.html&quot; title=&quot;Mosaic Communications Internet Directory&quot;&gt;standard starting points&lt;/a&gt; for anybody on the Web, and this little slice of history can help the young&apos;uns understand what the Web used to be like.

Reconstructed from archived files for your benefit by one &lt;a href=&quot;http://home.mcom.com/people/jwz/index.html&quot; title=&quot;Jamie Zawinski &quot;&gt;jwz&lt;/a&gt;, a task &lt;a href=&quot;http://jwz.livejournal.com/856745.html&quot; title=&quot;Happy Run Some Old Web Browsers Day!&quot;&gt;epic in the telling&lt;/a&gt;. </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.70392</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 15:29:21 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>aol</category>
		<category>getoffmylawn</category>
		<category>history</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>jwz</category>
		<category>mosaic</category>
		<category>mozilla</category>
		<category>netscape</category>
		<category>timewarner</category>
		<category>worldwideweb</category>
		<category>www</category>
		<dc:creator>ardgedee</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>IM: Not Just for Kids Anymore</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/35338/IM%2DNot%2DJust%2Dfor%2DKids%2DAnymore</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A54261-2004Sep1.html"&gt;Adults are picking up instant messaging&lt;/a&gt; in record numbers, with 50% of those over 35 using various systems.  This study was funded by AOL, which has a major stake in the instant messaging market through its popular AIM software.  But most people who use IM in the workplace are still using free and unsecured systems, despite the availability of secure versions in enterprise software and products like &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.zonelabs.com/store/content/catalog/products/sku_list_ims.jsp?lid=nav_fim&quot;&gt;IM Secure&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.35338</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2004 08:29:42 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>adults</category>
		<category>AOL</category>
		<category>communications</category>
		<category>demographics</category>
		<category>IM</category>
		<category>InstantMessaging</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>online</category>
		<category>technology</category>
		<category>WashingtonPost</category>
		<dc:creator>etoile</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The Two Faces of AOL and Microsoft&apos;s Spam Policies</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/25675/The%2DTwo%2DFaces%2Dof%2DAOL%2Dand%2DMicrosofts%2DSpam%2DPolicies</link>
		<description> Perhaps you&apos;ve seen the new MSN commercials that use M$&apos;s &quot;spam-blocking&quot; technology to support their ISP service. Maybe you&apos;ve read fluff pieces like &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn?pagename=article&amp;node=&amp;contentId=A37742-2003Feb20&amp;#0172;Found=true&quot;&gt;these&lt;/a&gt;, where AOL and Microsoft execs are allowed to wax poetic about their deep anti-spam convictions:

&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;&apos;I get spam too, and I am as fed up with it as all of our members are,&apos; AOL chief executive Jonathan F. Miller said yesterday.&quot; 

&quot;&apos;To help keep intruders at bay,&apos; Microsoft said, &quot;we must all do our part.&apos;&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;

So what&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bayarea.com/mld/mercurynews/news/local/5476163.htm&quot;&gt;&lt;i&gt;this&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/a&gt; all about?

&quot;&apos;AOL and Microsoft argue there is a place for legitimate unsolicited e-mail in the marketplace,&apos; said Marc Berejka, Microsoft&apos;s senior director of public policy.&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.25675</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2003 09:08:17 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>AmericaOnline</category>
		<category>AOL</category>
		<category>Email</category>
		<category>Internet</category>
		<category>ISP</category>
		<category>Microsoft</category>
		<category>Policy</category>
		<category>SPAM</category>
		<dc:creator>Pinwheel</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/18510/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.runabot.com"&gt;An interesting idea&lt;/a&gt; Create your own bot... Sounds like an interesting service. What do you think?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.18510</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jul 2002 15:00:15 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>aim</category>
		<category>aol</category>
		<category>bot</category>
		<category>bots</category>
		<category>communication</category>
		<category>im</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<dc:creator>TNLNYC</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/14889/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/000/922dgmtd.asp"&gt;Corporate censorship in China&lt;/a&gt; (via slashdot). I guess censorship and collusion in the repression of people is okay if you&apos;re making profits for your shareholders. An eye-opening look into the way that corporations are helping to facilitate censorship on the Internet in China. AOL and Yahoo&apos;s attitudes to what I thought were universal human rights is nothing short of sickening.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.14889</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2002 21:07:25 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>aol</category>
		<category>censorship</category>
		<category>china</category>
		<category>EFF</category>
		<category>google</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>yahoo</category>
		<dc:creator>pixelgeek</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/14333/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/zd/20020130/tc/aol_shuts_out_users_in_battle_over_im_1.html"&gt;AOL has been actively blocking Trillian users.&lt;/a&gt; If you switched over to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ceruleanstudios.com/&quot;&gt;Trillian&lt;/a&gt; and use AIM you&apos;ve had problems connecting all week. As of this morning, version 0.721 is working but will likely be blocked again. AOL is claiming it as a &quot;security&quot; issue.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.14333</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2002 06:51:03 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>AOL</category>
		<category>IM</category>
		<category>InstantMessaging</category>
		<category>Internet</category>
		<category>Newsfilter</category>
		<category>Security</category>
		<category>Trillian</category>
		<dc:creator>tommasz</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/14083/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/nm/20020122/tc/tech_aol_microsoft_dc_3.html"&gt;AOL&apos;s Netscape sues Microsoft &lt;/a&gt; for damage done to its Netscape Internet browser by violations of antitrust law found in a separate government case against the software giant.  &quot;I don&apos;t see this case as primarily about money. I see it as primarily about injunctive relief,&apos;&apos; said Steve Salop, a Georgetown University law professor.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.14083</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2002 19:05:42 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>antitrust</category>
		<category>AOL</category>
		<category>brokenlinks</category>
		<category>browsers</category>
		<category>deadlinks</category>
		<category>IE</category>
		<category>injunctions</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>InternetExplorer</category>
		<category>internetlaw</category>
		<category>microsoft</category>
		<category>monopolies</category>
		<category>netscape</category>
		<dc:creator>hitsman</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/10010/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.fool.com/news/breakfast/2001/breakfast010910.htm"&gt;AOL may buy AT&amp;T broadband&lt;/a&gt; in a deal that could allow them to own the browser, net access, data pipes, and content for a vast majority of internet usage and users. How far will AOL/TW go to control any and all forms of media? Are hearings to break the company up far off?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.10010</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2001 12:47:39 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>AOL</category>
		<category>ATT</category>
		<category>broadband</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>monopoly</category>
		<dc:creator>mathowie</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/7246/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1005-200-5726313.html?tag=mn_hd"&gt;InfoBots are coming.&lt;/a&gt; I believe we&apos;ve touched on this before, but now it seems to be moving from concept to reality: Instant Messenger &quot;buddies&quot; that are actually bots. You send them an IM with a question, such as &quot;Hey pal, what&apos;s the weather in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.northernstars.net/actorsstu/shaffer_paul.html&quot;&gt;Thunder Bay, Ontario&lt;/a&gt;?&quot; And it IMs you back with the answer, almost instantaneously. No waiting for messy web sites to load, no funky searches to run. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.activebuddy.com/&quot;&gt;ActiveBuddy&lt;/a&gt; has been the most, um, active in developing the technology, but they&apos;ve been working on it forever without anything to show to the public. Now, it&apos;s out there, somewhere. CNET is reporting today that an ActiveBuddy beta bot has been live for a few months; you can play with it right now if you know its name. (And if you do know its name, a tip would be appreciated. I&apos;ve been jonesing for this for a good while.) A more public version is supposed to be out in a few weeks. Here buddy buddy buddy...  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.7246</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2001 15:06:22 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>activebuddy</category>
		<category>agent</category>
		<category>agents</category>
		<category>AIM</category>
		<category>AOL</category>
		<category>bot</category>
		<category>bots</category>
		<category>brokenlinks</category>
		<category>computers</category>
		<category>IM</category>
		<category>instantmessage</category>
		<category>instantmessaging</category>
		<category>intelligentagent</category>
		<category>intelligentagents</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<dc:creator>aaron</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/6058/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.washtech.com/news/media/7871-1.html"&gt;AOL Dominates Web Traffic,&lt;/a&gt; according to Jupiter Media Metrix, who found that AOL Time Warner&#8217;s combined share of the time Americans spent online last month was 33(!) percent.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.6058</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2001 03:39:31 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>AOL</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>traffic</category>
		<category>web</category>
		<category>webtraffic</category>
		<dc:creator>frednorman</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/3907/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1005-200-3302689.html?tag=st.ne.1002.bgif.ni"&gt;AOL&apos;s walled garden.&lt;/a&gt; Anyone who doesnt think that AOL will only link to AOL/Time Warner properties in the broadband future is fooling themselves.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.3907</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2000 10:45:11 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>aol</category>
		<category>broadband</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>timewarner</category>
		<dc:creator>owillis</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/3706/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.flex.com/sign_up/"&gt;&quot;We probably don&apos;t want your business. Go away.&quot;&lt;/a&gt; That actually seems to be the message here. I don&apos;t recall such a hostile advertisement before. (Via &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.hardocp.com/&quot;&gt;HardOCP&lt;/a&gt;)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.3706</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Oct 2000 18:43:01 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>AOL</category>
		<category>Flex</category>
		<category>FlexNet</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>ISP</category>
		<category>n00bs</category>
		<category>newbies</category>
		<category>newbs</category>
		<dc:creator>Steven Den Beste</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/2739/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/nm/20000804/wr/aol_suit_dc_1.html"&gt;AOL&apos;s Netscape division is being sued by an NJ photographer&lt;/a&gt; over their SmartDownload feature, which allegedly allows surveillance of activity between websites and you.  He claims &quot;[SmartDownload] secretly transmits to Netscape the file name and location, along with an identification string unique to that Internet user.&apos;&apos;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;...we&apos;ve never used or accessed any information about SmartDownload users or files...&quot; - AOL  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.2739</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2000 18:35:19 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>aol</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>netscape</category>
		<category>smartdownload</category>
		<category>websites</category>
		<dc:creator>tomorama</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/2009/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nymag.com/page.cfm?page_id=3377&amp;amp;position=1"&gt;Parenting: Is Aol Worse Than TV?&lt;/a&gt;  After reading this article my first reaction was &quot;what an over-reaction,&quot; my second was &quot;Do these parents think AOL is the only way to (not) access the internet?&quot; (stolen from Robot Wisdom)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.2009</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2000 23:32:48 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>aol</category>
		<category>families</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>parenting</category>
		<category>television</category>
		<dc:creator>Mick</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/745/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://affiliate.aol.com/affiliate/welcome.adp"&gt;AOL jumps on the get-rich-quick bandwagon.&lt;/a&gt; &quot;Every time you generate a new member for AOL who stays for 90 days, AOL will pay you $15. Imagine how much extra cash you could make! Make $20,000, $40,000, $80,000, $100,000 - the sky is the limit!&quot; Wow, it almost sounds easier than working...  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.745</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2000 10:24:06 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>affiliates</category>
		<category>AOL</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>ReferAFriend</category>
		<dc:creator>mathowie</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


