<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with apple and drm</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/apple+drm</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'apple' and 'drm' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 08:18:23 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 08:18:23 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Dead men walking</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/78044/Dead%2Dmen%2Dwalking</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/07/books/07garn.html?_r=1&amp;amp;ref=arts"&gt;&#8220;You can&#8217;t roll a joint on an iPod&#8221;&lt;/a&gt; or how the iPod killed the music industry.  First the music biz overlooked the computer CD rom when they put copy control on cd burners.  Then they eliminated the single.  Shortly after that &quot;mp3&quot; replaced &quot;sex&quot; as the most popular search term.  Apple has become the largest music seller largely against the wishes of the music biz, but 99 cents beats free.  Yesterday &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2337929,00.asp&quot;&gt;Apple announced they were eliminating DRM&lt;/a&gt;.  The questions remains, who needs Universal Music Group, Sony BMG, Warner Music Group, and EMI, does Apple?  When is Apple just going to replace them?  There were rumors a year ago that they would &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ipodnn.com/articles/08/01/03/apple.jay.z.record.label/&quot;&gt;launch a record label with Jay-Z&lt;/a&gt; but that does not appear to have come to fruition.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.78044</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 08:18:23 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Apple</category>
		<category>BMG</category>
		<category>drm</category>
		<category>EMI</category>
		<category>ipod</category>
		<category>mp3</category>
		<category>music</category>
		<category>music_industry</category>
		<category>Sony</category>
		<category>Warner</category>
		<dc:creator>caddis</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Le DRM est mort, vive de musique num&amp;#0233;rique!</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/78026/Le%2DDRM%2Dest%2Dmort%2Dvive%2Dde%2Dmusique%2Dnumrique</link>
		<description> Who would have known that that the death of DRM would come in the form of a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.apple.com/pr/library/2009/01/06itunes.html&quot;&gt;press release&lt;/a&gt;? While &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/MP3-Music-Download/b?ie=UTF8&amp;node=163856011&quot;&gt;MP3&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bigpondmusic.com&quot;&gt;stores&lt;/a&gt; are nothing new, with iTunes moving to a 100% DRM free catalog by the 31st of March this now cements a de facto standard of DRM free music in the marketplace. As a side effect it&apos;s now a near certainty that &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advanced_Audio_Coding&quot;&gt;AAC&lt;/a&gt; will become the successor of &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MP3&quot;&gt;MP3&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.78026</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 16:15:22 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>abouttime</category>
		<category>apple</category>
		<category>digitalmusic</category>
		<category>drm</category>
		<category>drmfree</category>
		<category>itunes</category>
		<dc:creator>Talez</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Playsforsuren&apos;t</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/71468/Playsforsurent</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://diveintomark.org/archives/2008/05/06/the-day-the-music-died"&gt;The Day the Music Died&lt;/a&gt; &lt;em&gt;The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) [...] has also been warning anyone who would listen that they should not &#8220;purchase&#8221; encrypted music from these services, since if these services go under then all that &#8220;purchased&#8221; music will no longer&#8230; what&#8217;s the word&#8230; &#8220;play&#8221;. But mostly people ignored them (and me), because, you know, &lt;strong&gt;Microsoft&lt;/strong&gt; was at the center of it all, and nobody ever got fired for &#8220;buying&#8221; from Microsoft. &lt;/em&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.71468</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 14:18:50 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>apple</category>
		<category>drm</category>
		<category>itunes</category>
		<category>microsoft</category>
		<category>music</category>
		<category>playsforsure</category>
		<dc:creator>desjardins</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>iPhone SDK details</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/69688/iPhone%2DSDK%2Ddetails</link>
		<description> Extensible applications such as Firefox appear to be banned by Apple&apos;s iPhone SDK license agreement: &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.mozilla.com/rob-sayre/2008/03/06/apple-bans-firefox-spidermonkey-lisp-lua-ruby-python-rhino-java-opera-gcc/&quot;&gt;No interpreted code may be downloaded and used in an Application except for code that is interpreted and run by Apple&#8217;s Published APIs and builtin interpreter(s)&#8230; An Application may not itself install or launch other executable code by any means, including without limitation through the use of a plug-in architecture, calling other frameworks, other APIs or otherwise.&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://macdaddyworld.com/2008/03/06/iphone-sdk-first-thoughts/&quot;&gt;An Application may write data on a device only to the Application&apos;s designated container area, except as otherwise specified by Apple. Applications may only use Published APIs in the manner prescribed by Apple and must not use or call any unpublished or private APIs.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.69688</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 00:39:20 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>apple</category>
		<category>drm</category>
		<category>iphone</category>
		<category>osx</category>
		<category>programming</category>
		<category>sdk</category>
		<dc:creator>finite</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The U2 iPod:  Back when we were friends.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/62563/The%2DU2%2DiPod%2DBack%2Dwhen%2Dwe%2Dwere%2Dfriends</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://lefsetz.com/&quot;&gt;Bob Lefsetz has been sharing his opinions on the music industry for years.&lt;/a&gt;  In last night&apos;s newsletter, he announces, &lt;a href=&quot;http://lefsetz.com/wordpress/index.php/archives/2007/07/02/universalitunes/&quot;&gt;&quot;Let the games begin!&quot;&lt;/a&gt; - and indeed, let them.  Universal Music has declined to re-sign to a long term deal with Apple, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/reuters/business/business-universalmusic-itunes.html?_r=1&amp;oref=slogint&quot;&gt;essentially leaving them open to &lt;i&gt;exclusive&lt;/i&gt; deals with other services.&lt;/a&gt;  The fact that Doug Morris (chairman of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.vivendi.com/ir/en/keybusinesses/key_business_music.php&quot;&gt;UMG&lt;/a&gt;) and Zach Horowitz (President of Universal&apos;s parent company, Vivendi) have been gearing up to loosen the stranglehold that iTunes has on online distribution is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ft.com/cms/s/b194883e-36b2-11db-89d6-0000779e2340.html&quot;&gt;not exactly news.&lt;/a&gt;  They&apos;ve used similar tactics against &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.engadget.com/2006/11/09/universal-music-get-fee-for-every-zune-sold/&quot;&gt;Microsoft&apos;s Zune&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.softpedia.com/news/Vivendi-vs-YouTube-The-Battle-Is-About-To-Begin-56012.shtml&quot;&gt;YouTube.&lt;/a&gt;  But with the release of the iPhone and following his well-timed decision to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.apple.com/hotnews/thoughtsonmusic/&quot;&gt;openly &quot;share his thoughts&quot; on DRM,&lt;/a&gt; not to mention &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.com.com/EMI,+Apple+partner+on+DRM-free+premium+music/2100-1027_3-6172398.html&quot;&gt;his landmark deal with (perennial &quot;armpit of the industry&quot;) EMI to sell their music DRM-free and at a higher cost&lt;/a&gt; - the real question is: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/02/business/media/02universal.html&quot;&gt;is Steve Jobs ready to play hardball?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.62563</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2007 08:00:33 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>apple</category>
		<category>bobLefsetz</category>
		<category>DougMorris</category>
		<category>DRM</category>
		<category>EMI</category>
		<category>iPhone</category>
		<category>iPod</category>
		<category>iTunes</category>
		<category>music</category>
		<category>spiralfrog</category>
		<category>SteveJobs</category>
		<category>universal</category>
		<category>Vivendi</category>
		<category>ZachHoriowitz</category>
		<dc:creator>phaedon</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>iTunes Loses a Little DRM</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/61621/iTunes%2DLoses%2Da%2DLittle%2DDRM</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.electronista.com/articles/07/05/30/apple.releases.itunes.72/"&gt;iTunes Plus has been released.&lt;/a&gt; Following &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/59935/EMI-goes-DRMless&quot;&gt;EMI&apos;s announcement&lt;/a&gt; that it would begin offering its entire catalog DRM-free (and a &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.business2.com/apple/2007/05/appleemi_music_.html&quot;&gt;barely-averted&lt;/a&gt; torpedoing of that plan), Apple has released an update to iTunes that offers DRM-free, 256kps AAC songs for $1.29. Entire albums are the same price as their DRM-laden counterparts. Those who have purchased EMI music can upgrade their files for $.30/song, $.60/album, or 30% of the album price.

Currently only EMI is on-board, but &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/27/apple-to-itunes-partners-feel-free-to-drop-your-drm-as-well/&quot;&gt;Apple is perfectly happy&lt;/a&gt; to bring other labels into the DRM-free universe.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.61621</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 08:49:39 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>apple</category>
		<category>drm</category>
		<category>emi</category>
		<category>itunes</category>
		<dc:creator>mkultra</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Steve Jobs&apos; Thoughts on Music</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/58397/Steve%2DJobs%2DThoughts%2Don%2DMusic</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.apple.com/hotnews/thoughtsonmusic/"&gt;Thoughts on Music&lt;/a&gt; &quot;...in a heartbeat. If the big four music companies would license Apple their music without the requirement that it be protected with a DRM, we would switch to selling only DRM-free music on our iTunes store.&quot; &#8212; Steve Jobs  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.58397</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 12:52:09 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Apple</category>
		<category>DRM</category>
		<category>iTunes</category>
		<category>Jobs</category>
		<dc:creator>timeistight</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>FairPlay is turned about.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/55233/FairPlay%2Dis%2Dturned%2Dabout</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://featured.gigaom.com/2006/10/02/dvd-jon-fairplays-apple/"&gt;FairPlay is turned about.&lt;/a&gt; &quot;DVD&quot; Jon Lech Johansen, of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~dst/DeCSS/Gallery/decss-haiku.txt&quot;&gt;DeCSS&lt;/a&gt; fame, has reverse engineered Apple&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.apple.com/support/itunes/musicstore/authorization/&quot;&gt;FairPlay&lt;/a&gt; DRM technology, which has thus far prevented 3rd-party digital music players from playing music purchased from the iTunes Store. RealNetworks did &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FairPlay#Harmony&quot;&gt;something similar&lt;/a&gt; in 2004, but Johansen is licensing it to whomever wants it.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.55233</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2006 13:41:18 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>apple</category>
		<category>decss</category>
		<category>drm</category>
		<category>fairplay</category>
		<category>ipod</category>
		<category>itms</category>
		<category>itunes</category>
		<dc:creator>mkultra</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Sk&amp;#0229;l!</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/48652/Sk0229l</link>
		<description> Similar to the US &lt;a href=http://www.ftc.gov/&gt;Federal Trade Commission&lt;/a&gt;, the Consumer Council of Norway, or &lt;a href=&quot;http://forbrukerportalen.no/filer/fil_FR_ENG_Profilbrosj.pdf&quot;&gt;Forbrukerr&amp;#0229;det&lt;/a&gt; (PDF) strives &quot;to achieve a balance of power between the consumer and the provider of products or services.&quot; This week, the council filed a &lt;a href=&quot;http://forbrukerportalen.no/Artikler/2006/1138119849.71&quot;&gt;formal complaint&lt;/a&gt;, citing several violations of Norwegian law in the fluid &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.apple.com/support/itunes/legal/terms.html&quot;&gt;terms of service&lt;/a&gt; attached to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.apple.com/itunes/overview/&quot;&gt;iTunes&lt;/a&gt; music file downloads.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.48652</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2006 00:10:35 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Apple</category>
		<category>Consumer</category>
		<category>ConsumerRights</category>
		<category>DRM</category>
		<category>Forbrukerr&#xe5;det</category>
		<category>iTunes</category>
		<category>Law</category>
		<category>Norway</category>
		<dc:creator>Rothko</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


