MetaFilter posts tagged with argument

For some reason, Usenet was full of cranks

The Whelk — Wed, 11 Feb 2009 18:00:03 -0800

How to Argue With Zompist: Or Social-Skills 101 A helpful guide for online discussion and debate written by Mark Rosenfelder with some help from notmydesk and others.

Your Favorite X Sucks. Or Not.

Navelgazer — Fri, 30 Jan 2009 13:06:16 -0800

Pop Culture Blind Spots, Guilty Pleasures, Guilty Displeasures and Sacred Cows from The A.V. Club

Hierarchy of Disagreement

GuyZero — Wed, 21 May 2008 09:47:34 -0800

The Hierarchy of Disagreement: Based on Paul Graham's essay "How to Disagree" (prev), the diagram ranks the types of arguments that can be made. Not quite the same as logical fallacies but a useful guide to measure whether you're making a good argument or if "you are an ass hat".

Training Ground for Democracy

silby — Tue, 11 Sep 2007 13:51:36 -0800

The Massachusetts Museum of Contemporary Art was to have been the home of Christoph Büchel's first major US installation, "Training Ground for Democracy". But disputes over budget overruns and missed deadlines led the museum to cancel the project. [NYT registration required] The incomplete installation is now tied up in litigation, and covered by tarp.

Arguing pays off

serazin — Tue, 21 Aug 2007 09:25:51 -0800

Women who stifle themselves in marital arguments die younger says a recent study.

My Quonah

feelinglistless — Sun, 03 Sep 2006 03:27:57 -0800

My Quonah. "My name is David C and I am the biggest idiot on this planet! Every girl I've ever met has done nothing except want me for what I had to offer them, the amount of cash I could throw their way and not for the person I was. One day that all changed when I meet a lady called Quonah..." Should she call him?

Best of the logical web

Gyan — Sat, 11 Feb 2006 23:21:29 -0800

Fallacy Files

How To Win An Argument

grumblebee — Mon, 05 Sep 2005 17:31:25 -0800

How To Win An Argument. Plus, if you scroll down, you'll find an argument about "How To Win An Argument." (Which may remind you of a Monty Python skit.) What do you think of this guy's strategy? Compassionate or passive-aggressive?

Truthmapping: The Ultimate Attempt to Rationalize Debate?

shivohum — Mon, 25 Jul 2005 23:01:01 -0800

Truthmapping: The Ultimate Attempt to Rationalize Debate? From lofty ontological arguments for the existence of God and for the self-contradictory nature of determinism to relatively more down to earth propositions about the unconstitutionality of abortion and the justice of the war in Iraq: can many significant debates be reduced to simple sets of premises and conclusions? Should they be?

rushmc — Fri, 03 Aug 2001 11:28:11 -0800

There is something further to be said on the issue of disagreement. If two people find that there are arguments on both sides that are both very compelling, maybe that renders the answer to the question what is right and wrong indeterminate. Maybe there isn’t a clear answer. [via SciTech Daily]

Steven Den Beste — Tue, 03 Jul 2001 14:40:48 -0800

"Biggest flame war of all time: Danny Boy - sentimental Irish favorite, or stupid song decried by true Celts everywhere?" A link to a discussion in another forum about how one prevents the banal from driving out the profound in online public-participation forums. (Their conclusion: ruthless and efficient moderation.)

geronimo_rex — Mon, 02 Jul 2001 11:10:14 -0800

Terrorists on MeFi!