<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with armsrace</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/armsrace</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'armsrace' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2006 17:07:19 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2006 17:07:19 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Strike back before they pollute our natural fluids</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/50703/Strike%2Dback%2Dbefore%2Dthey%2Dpollute%2Dour%2Dnatural%2Dfluids</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.theage.com.au/news/world/us-plans-nuclear-revamp/2006/04/06/1143916656867.html"&gt;US Rolls out new Nuclear Program.&lt;/a&gt; Consolidate nuclear stores. Ok. Plan with &quot;potential for new bomb designs&quot;. &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SORT&quot;&gt;Whaaaaaa&lt;/a&gt;? &lt;small&gt;(partially from &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.digg.com&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/small&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.50703</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2006 17:07:19 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>armsrace</category>
		<category>duckandcover</category>
		<category>newsfilter</category>
		<category>nuclear</category>
		<category>slightlybatshitinsane</category>
		<dc:creator>phyrewerx</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/10737/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.reuters.com/news_article.jhtml;jsessionid=RF4X4WR40OKY0CRBAEOCFEYKEEARKIWD?type=topnews&amp;amp;StoryID=238983"&gt;Is Terrorists For Nukes the 2001 version of Arms For Hostages?&lt;/a&gt; President Bush has lifted the sanctions on India and Pakistan imposed by the U.S. in 1998 to protest their &quot;tit-for-tat&quot; nuclear tests.  In a memorandum just released by the White House, he states that keeping those sanctions in place  &quot;would not be in the national security interests of the United States&quot;.  
Is this an acceptable exchange? Just how far should the U.S. go in appeasing Pakistan, not to mention further fuelling its already explosive confrontation with India?   </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.10737</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2001 00:57:17 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>armsrace</category>
		<category>bombs</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>deadlink</category>
		<category>india</category>
		<category>nuclear</category>
		<category>nuclearproliferation</category>
		<category>nukes</category>
		<category>pakistan</category>
		<category>subcontinent</category>
		<dc:creator>MiguelCardoso</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/9176/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.cnn.com/2001/WORLD/europe/07/22/bush.putin/index.html"&gt;Bush, Putin agree on missile talks&lt;/a&gt; &quot;GENOA, Italy -- U.S. President George W. Bush and Russian President Vladimir Putin have agreed to tie U.S. plans for building a missile defence shield to talks on reducing nuclear stockpiles. &quot;  Arms race averted?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.9176</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jul 2001 09:32:48 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>armsrace</category>
		<category>bush</category>
		<category>putin</category>
		<dc:creator>nicolotesla</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


