<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with ban and law</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/ban+law</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'ban' and 'law' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2004 10:49:34 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2004 10:49:34 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Just say no to Crack</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/32666/Just%2Dsay%2Dno%2Dto%2DCrack</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nola.com/news/t-p/metro/index.ssf?/base/news-2/1082626816241180.xml"&gt;Staking out the high moral ground, a bill would punish those wearing low-riding jeans.&lt;/a&gt; It seems that  &lt;a href=&quot;http://house.legis.state.la.us/H-Reps/members.asp?ID=87&quot;&gt;Representative Derrick D. T. Shepherd&lt;/a&gt; of Louisiana, a Democrat no less, wants to outlaw low slung pants. Plumbers beware, and stock up on &lt;a href=&quot;http://abacusplans.com/plans/ABA-PBC1.asp&quot;&gt;Butt-Crack Caulk&lt;/a&gt;! Really, don&apos;t they have anything better to legislate besides fashion or &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theadvertiser.com/news/html/9E3DBAF8-2DF4-4764-9CC7-6CD73545ADAC.shtml&quot;&gt;holidays&lt;/a&gt;?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.32666</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2004 10:49:34 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>ban</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>butt</category>
		<category>buttcrack</category>
		<category>butts</category>
		<category>crack</category>
		<category>DerrickShepherd</category>
		<category>fashion</category>
		<category>jeans</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>Louisiana</category>
		<category>lowrise</category>
		<category>morality</category>
		<category>obscenity</category>
		<category>pants</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<dc:creator>Eekacat</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Government owned by corporations</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/31804/Government%2Downed%2Dby%2Dcorporations</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.wired.com/news/digiwood/0,1412,62665,00.html?tw=wn_culthead_5"&gt;Vans Stevenson, senior lobbyist for MPAA&lt;/a&gt; (the Motion Picture Association of America), was the last to revise a letter California State Attorney General Bill Lockyer is to distribute to other attorney generals. Lockyer is the president of the  National Association of Attorneys General. - is your government owned? Lockyer receives thousands in campaign contributions from MPAA, RIAA, and &apos;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/6/36269.html&quot;&gt;[via: The Register]..corporate and private donations from the major studios, including The Paramount Pictures Group, Sony Pictures Entertainment Inc., Warner Bros PAC, AOL Time Warner. Senior executives, such as Alan Horn and Howard Welinsky, respectively CEO and senior VP at Warner Brothers..&lt;/a&gt;.&quot; Adam Eisgrau of P2P United said that &quot;the draft attributed to the attorney general&apos;s office contains many significant factual errors, eyebrow-raising metadata, and articulates a very broad expansion in several important respects of product liability and consumer protection law that would have enormous effects..&apos; It&apos;s in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2004/03/16/technology/16peer.html&quot;&gt;The NY Times&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.slyck.com/news.php?story=426&quot;&gt;Slyck&lt;/a&gt; has &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.slyck.com/misc/AG_Draft_Letter.htm&quot;&gt;the original document&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.31804</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2004 23:31:22 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>ban</category>
		<category>BillLockyer</category>
		<category>copyright</category>
		<category>filesharing</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>MPAA</category>
		<category>p2p</category>
		<category>piracy</category>
		<category>VansStevenson</category>
		<dc:creator>giantkicks</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>This why the Federal Government has more than one branch</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/24260/This%2Dwhy%2Dthe%2DFederal%2DGovernment%2Dhas%2Dmore%2Dthan%2Done%2Dbranch</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/2848001.stm"&gt;The Senate bans &quot;partial birth&quot; abortions,&lt;/a&gt; but a similar law was struck down in &lt;a href=&quot;http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?navby=search&amp;court=US&amp;case=/us/000/99%2D830.html&quot;&gt;Stenberg v. Carhart &lt;/a&gt;.  Memo to Mr. Bush: there are &lt;a href=&quot;http://oyez.nwu.edu/&quot;&gt;other&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.supremecourtus.gov/&quot;&gt;branches &lt;/a&gt;of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fedworld.gov/&quot;&gt;U.S. Federal Government&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.24260</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2003 09:30:30 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>abortion</category>
		<category>ban</category>
		<category>BBC</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>PartialBirth</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>Senate</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<dc:creator>Bag Man</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/17665/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.google.co.uk/search?sourceid=navclient&amp;amp;q=cache:http://www.cnn.com/2002/ALLPOLITICS/04/26/atomic.licenseplates.ap/index.html"&gt;Atomic blast licence plates&lt;/a&gt; are &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lvrj.com/lvrj_home/2002/Jun-07-Fri-2002/news/18919537.html&quot;&gt;
rejected by state&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br&gt;
&quot;Any reference on a license plate to weapons of mass destruction is 
inappropriate and would likely offend our citizens.&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.17665</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2002 15:36:19 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>atomic</category>
		<category>ban</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>cars</category>
		<category>dmv</category>
		<category>doublepost</category>
		<category>driving</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>licenseplates</category>
		<category>Nevada</category>
		<category>nuclear</category>
		<category>plates</category>
		<category>VanityPlates</category>
		<dc:creator>Mwongozi</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/14606/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.pressenterpriseonline.com/cgi-bin/liveique.acgi$rec=17009?frontpage3"&gt;Town passes law banning nudity...&lt;/a&gt; ... but more notable is the section of the law banning erections in males over 10 years old. Why was a law like this needed? (link via &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.obscurestore.com&quot;&gt;Obscure Store&lt;/a&gt;)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.14606</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2002 10:37:08 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>ban</category>
		<category>erection</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>laws</category>
		<category>nudity</category>
		<dc:creator>krewson</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/5334/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/uk_politics/newsid_1123000/1123412.stm"&gt;UK Govt. votes to ban hunting in England and Wales.&lt;/a&gt; Browsing the web last night, several national polls were showing that more of the British Public were against a ban than in favour. Will the MPs who turned up to vote but not to debate (not very democratic?) live to regret their decision as the debate turns from animal welfare to civil rights?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.5334</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2001 04:48:21 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>animalrights</category>
		<category>animals</category>
		<category>animalwelfare</category>
		<category>ban</category>
		<category>dogs</category>
		<category>England</category>
		<category>foxhunt</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>hunting</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>UK</category>
		<category>Wales</category>
		<dc:creator>nico</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/3689/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.msnbc.com/news/475760.asp?0nm"&gt;Indianapolis minors can&apos;t play&lt;/a&gt; violent videogames anymore.   </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.3689</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2000 15:17:39 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>ban</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>children</category>
		<category>games</category>
		<category>gaming</category>
		<category>Indiana</category>
		<category>Indianapolis</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>minors</category>
		<category>videogames</category>
		<category>violence</category>
		<category>violent</category>
		<dc:creator>skallas</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


