<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with benefits</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/benefits</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'benefits' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 09:49:29 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 09:49:29 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Is Day Care a luxury or a benefit?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/73056/Is%2DDay%2DCare%2Da%2Dluxury%2Dor%2Da%2Dbenefit</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/05/business/05nocera.html"&gt;On Day Care, Google Makes a Rare Fumble&lt;/a&gt; &lt;i&gt;You&#8217;re probably guessing that because it involves &#8220;do no evil&#8221; Google, Fortune magazine&#8217;s &#8220;Best Company to Work For&#8221; the past two years, this is a heart-warming tale of a good company reversing a dumb decision.  If only.&lt;/i&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.73056</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 09:49:29 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>benefits</category>
		<category>business</category>
		<category>daycare</category>
		<category>google</category>
		<category>job</category>
		<category>nytimes</category>
		<category>perks</category>
		<category>work</category>
		<dc:creator>ThePinkSuperhero</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Many Retirees May Lose Benefit From Employers</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/67739/Many%2DRetirees%2DMay%2DLose%2DBenefit%2DFrom%2DEmployers</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eeoc.gov/&quot;&gt;The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/27/washington/27retire.html?hp&quot;&gt;said Wednesday that employers could reduce or eliminate health benefits for retirees&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eeoc.gov/press/12-26-07.html&quot;&gt; when they turn 65 and become eligible for Medicare&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_Discrimination_in_Employment_Act&quot;&gt;without violating the Age Discrimination in Employment Act &lt;/a&gt; The policy, set forth in a new regulation, allows employers to establish two classes of retirees, with more comprehensive benefits for those under 65 and more limited benefits for those who are older.
Many retirees may lose their benefits entirely. </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.67739</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2007 20:18:03 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>ADEA</category>
		<category>benefits</category>
		<category>EEOC</category>
		<category>insurance</category>
		<dc:creator>brevator</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The Shark in the Free Care Pool</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/34825/The%2DShark%2Din%2Dthe%2DFree%2DCare%2DPool</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.boston.com/business/articles/2004/08/06/corporate_freeloaders/"&gt;The Freeloader Registry.&lt;/a&gt; When an employer pays low wages and doesn&apos;t provide health care benefits, its employees often end up getting free care through state and federal programs.  How much does this cost you, and which companies benefit from the practice?  A new Massachusetts state law will provide detailed information about top corporate welchers.  (This follows recent discussion of the topic in the context of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nathannewman.org/log/archives/001716.shtml&quot;&gt;Wal-Mart&lt;/a&gt;.) 
Via &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.goodjobsfirst.org/&quot;&gt;Good Jobs First&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.34825</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2004 14:52:05 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>benefits</category>
		<category>corporate</category>
		<category>freeloaders</category>
		<category>health</category>
		<category>healthcare</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>massachusetts</category>
		<category>wages</category>
		<dc:creator>alms</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Celebrities &amp; Charity</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/30240/Celebrities%2DCharity</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.latimes.com/la-fi-charity8dec08.story"&gt;Celebrities take large payments from charities.&lt;/a&gt; The LA Times (reg reqd) is reporting that celebrities have received enormous payments for making appearances at celebrity benefits, including David Schwimmer, Cher, Gerald Ford, and others.  To me, it&apos;s a shocking new low, but maybe I shouldn&apos;t be surprised.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.30240</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2003 10:16:36 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>benefits</category>
		<category>celebrities</category>
		<category>celebrity</category>
		<category>charities</category>
		<category>compensation</category>
		<category>payments</category>
		<dc:creator>MikeB</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Government benefits: screwing the young</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/30157/Government%2Dbenefits%2Dscrewing%2Dthe%2Dyoung</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://slate.msn.com/id/2092302/"&gt;Screwing the young.&lt;/a&gt; American government benefits will give a typical man reaching age 65 today a net windfall of more than $70,000 beyond what he paid in. A luckless 25-year-old, by contrast, can count on paying $322,000 more in payroll taxes than he will ever get back in benefits.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.30157</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2003 18:22:19 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>benefits</category>
		<category>employment</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>Slate</category>
		<category>SocialSecurity</category>
		<category>tax</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<dc:creator>NortonDC</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/18949/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.alternet.org/story.html?StoryID=13648"&gt;Promiscuity is good.&lt;/a&gt;  I knew something felt right about the &apos;70s. (courtesy of &lt;a href=http://www.aldaily.com/&gt;Arts &amp;amp; Letters&lt;/a&gt;).  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.18949</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Aug 2002 05:22:19 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>anthropology</category>
		<category>benefits</category>
		<category>evolution</category>
		<category>evolutionary</category>
		<category>good</category>
		<category>infidelity</category>
		<category>multiplepartners</category>
		<category>promiscuity</category>
		<category>virtues</category>
		<dc:creator>fpatrick</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/15128/</link>
		<description> Unemployed people are supposed to be actively looking for work, not spending all of their time answering e-mail, drawing cartoons and getting interviewed on television about being unemployed. So there is a good chance Todd Rosenberg, creator of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.oddtodd.com/&quot;&gt;oddtodd.com&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.oddtodd.com/index2.html&quot;&gt;&quot;Laid Off: A Day in the Life,&quot;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.iht.com/articles/49371.html&quot;&gt;will be asked to repay the last seven weeks of his unemployment benefits&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.15128</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2002 05:29:47 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>benefits</category>
		<category>jobhunt</category>
		<category>oddtodd</category>
		<category>unemployment</category>
		<dc:creator>tranquileye</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


