<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with bigbang and NASA</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/bigbang+NASA</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'bigbang' and 'NASA' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 14:28:16 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 14:28:16 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Dark Flow</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/75164/Dark%2DFlow</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/080923-dark-flows.html"&gt;Mysterious New &apos;Dark Flow&apos; Discovered in Space.&lt;/a&gt; &quot;As if the mysteries of dark matter and dark energy weren&apos;t vexing enough, another baffling cosmic puzzle has been discovered. Patches of matter in the universe seem to be moving at very high speeds and in a uniform direction that can&apos;t be explained by any of the known gravitational forces in the observable universe. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nasa.gov/centers/goddard/news/topstory/2008/dark_flow.html&quot;&gt;Astronomers are calling the phenomenon &apos;dark flow.&apos;&lt;/a&gt; The stuff that&apos;s pulling this matter must be outside the observable universe, researchers conclude.&quot; Here&apos;s the paper (subscription required): &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/592947&quot;&gt;A Measurement of Large-Scale Peculiar Velocities of Clusters of Galaxies: Results and Cosmological Implications&lt;/a&gt;. 

NASA has preprints you can download: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nasa.gov/centers/goddard/pdf/276176main_ApJLetters_20Oct2008.pdf&quot;&gt;results and implications&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nasa.gov/centers/goddard/pdf/276175main_ApJ_inpress.pdf&quot;&gt;technical details&lt;/a&gt; (PDFs). </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.75164</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 14:28:16 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Astronomy</category>
		<category>Astrophysics</category>
		<category>BigBang</category>
		<category>DarkFlow</category>
		<category>Gravity</category>
		<category>NASA</category>
		<category>Pook</category>
		<category>Science</category>
		<category>Space</category>
		<category>Universe</category>
		<dc:creator>homunculus</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>heck of a job, George</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/48977/heck%2Dof%2Da%2Djob%2DGeorge</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2006/02/08/politics/08nasa.html?_r=2&amp;amp;oref=slogin&amp;amp;oref=slogin"&gt;Updatefilter: George C. Deutsch has resigned.&lt;/a&gt; &lt;small&gt;&lt;small&gt;(for NYT links, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bugmenot.com/view/www.nytimes.com&quot;&gt;see BugMeNot&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/small&gt; 

&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;i&gt;(T)he young presidential appointee at NASA who told public affairs workers to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2006/01/29/science/earth/29climate.html?ex=1139547600&amp;en=e17c542054b7a053&amp;ei=5070&quot;&gt;limit reporters&apos; access to a top climate scientist&lt;/a&gt; and told a Web designer to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2006/02/04/science/04climate.html&quot;&gt;add the word &quot;theory&quot; at every mention of the Big Bang&lt;/a&gt;, resigned yesterday, agency officials said. &lt;/i&gt;&lt;small&gt;&lt;small&gt;(previously discussed &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/48906&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; on MeFi)&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/small&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;

&lt;i&gt;Mr. Deutsch&apos;s resignation came on the same day that officials at &lt;a href=&quot;http://scientificactivist.blogspot.com/2006/02/breaking-news-george-deutsch-did-not.html&quot;&gt;Texas A&amp;amp;M University confirmed that he did not graduate from there&lt;/a&gt;, as his r&amp;#0233;sum&amp;#0233; on file at the agency asserted. [...]&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;

Mr. Deutsch, 24, was offered a job as a writer and editor in NASA&apos;s public affairs office in Washington last year after working on President Bush&apos;s re-election campaign and inaugural committee, according to his r&amp;#0233;sum&amp;#0233;. No one has disputed those parts of the document.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.48977</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2006 22:28:09 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bigbang</category>
		<category>georgedeutsch</category>
		<category>nasa</category>
		<dc:creator>edverb</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Intelligent Design promoted over Big Bang theory by 24 year old NASA appointee</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/48906/Intelligent%2DDesign%2Dpromoted%2Dover%2DBig%2DBang%2Dtheory%2Dby%2D24%2Dyear%2Dold%2DNASA%2Dappointee</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://cosmicvariance.com/2006/02/04/administration-official-big-bang-is-just-a-theory/"&gt;Religious Nuttery Wins Out over Scientific Fact&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.salon.com/0002874/2006/02/04.html&quot;&gt;George Deutsch&lt;/a&gt;, a presidential appointee in NASA headquarters, told a Web designer working for the agency to add the word &#8220;theory&#8221; after every mention of the Big Bang, according to an e-mail message from Mr. Deutsch that another NASA employee forwarded to The Times.

The Big Bang memo came from Mr. Deutsch, a 24-year-old presidential appointee in the press office at NASA headquarters whose r&amp;#0233;sum&amp;#0233; says he was an intern in the &#8220;war room&#8221; of the 2004 Bush-Cheney re-election campaign. &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.salon.com/0002874/2006/02/04.html&quot;&gt;A 2003 journalism graduate of Texas A&amp;amp;M&lt;/a&gt;, he was also the public-affairs officer who sought more control over Dr. Hansen&#8217;s public statements.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.48906</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2006 11:58:07 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bigbang</category>
		<category>georgedeutsch</category>
		<category>nasa</category>
		<dc:creator>mk1gti</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The oldest light in the cosmos</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/23492/The%2Doldest%2Dlight%2Din%2Dthe%2Dcosmos</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/m_or/PresseRelease2_03.html&quot;&gt;BAM!&lt;/a&gt; The &lt;a href=&quot;http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov&quot;&gt;Microwave Anisotropy Probe&lt;/a&gt;&apos;s long-awaited &lt;a href=&quot;http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/m_mm.html&quot;&gt;map&lt;/a&gt; of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://background.uchicago.edu/~whu/beginners/introduction.html&quot;&gt;afterglow of the big bang&lt;/a&gt; was released today, and all of a sudden, most of the uncertainty in the concordance model of cosmology has disappeared. We now know, to within 1%, that the universe is 13.7 billion years old. We now know that Hubble constant is 71, plus or minus 4. And though the results agreed stunningly well with the &lt;a href=&quot;http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/m_mm/mr_content.html&quot;&gt;weird picture&lt;/a&gt; that cosmologists have about the nature of the cosmos, there was one surprise -- the first stars were born way before expected. Great day for science, and a likely future Nobel.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.23492</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2003 16:30:55 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>astronomy</category>
		<category>bam</category>
		<category>bigbang</category>
		<category>nasa</category>
		<category>universe</category>
		<dc:creator>ptermit</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/8725/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.cnn.com/POLL/popup/last10.frameset.exclude.html"&gt;$145 million&lt;/a&gt; in a search for evidence of Big Bangs! So far the popular vote indicates most are in favor of the spending--whatever the cnn data is worth. Am I the only one who&apos;d prefer it spent on my undergrad work, or even biosciences research?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.8725</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jul 2001 10:21:47 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>astronomy</category>
		<category>BigBang</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>evidence</category>
		<category>funding</category>
		<category>NASA</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<dc:creator>greyscale</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


