<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with bostoni90</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/bostoni90</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'bostoni90' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jan 2003 06:28:08 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Jan 2003 06:28:08 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Boston I-90 opens</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/22746/Boston%2DI90%2Dopens</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.boston.com/dailyglobe2/009/metro/_6_5b_Mass_Turnpike_extension_to_open+.shtml"&gt;Boston thanks the rest of the USA for their $14 billion roadway system of about 8 miles.&lt;/a&gt; The new extension of I-90 opens at the end of the month making the longest Interstate highway a few miles longer.  The I-90 section alone cost $6.5 Billion.  The entire USA is paying for this project because it is federally funded.  Are projects like these necessary urban construction of the future?  or is it just a black hole of $?  Traffic in Boston will improve, but many think the cost was too high.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.22746</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jan 2003 06:28:08 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>boston</category>
		<category>bostoni90</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>deadlink</category>
		<category>freeway</category>
		<category>highway</category>
		<category>i90</category>
		<category>interstate</category>
		<dc:creator>LinemanBear</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


