<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with buddylee</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/buddylee</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'buddylee' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2000 08:13:49 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2000 08:13:49 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/2697/</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rubberburner.com&quot;&gt;Rubberburner.com&lt;/a&gt; has been making the rounds via email and weblog, as has &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.supergreg.com&quot;&gt;supergreg.com&lt;/a&gt;. They both look a little too &quot;perfect&quot; to be true, don&apos;t they? Turns out they&apos;re both carefully crafted ad sites, designed to sell us &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.buddylee.com&quot;&gt;Lee jeans&lt;/a&gt;. Will we be seeing more of the Mahir ad model? I wonder how they went about spreading it initially....  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.2697</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2000 08:13:49 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>advertising</category>
		<category>brokenlinks</category>
		<category>buddylee</category>
		<category>denim</category>
		<category>leejeans</category>
		<dc:creator>jkottke</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


