<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with bugs and software</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/bugs+software</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'bugs' and 'software' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2003 06:03:47 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2003 06:03:47 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>WaSP Calls for MS to Fix Standards Bugs in Discontinued IE</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/26663/WaSP%2DCalls%2Dfor%2DMS%2Dto%2DFix%2DStandards%2DBugs%2Din%2DDiscontinued%2DIE</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://webstandards.org/opinion/archive/2003/06/27/"&gt;IE in bug fix mode? Then fix the bugs!&lt;/a&gt; As was &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/26386&quot;&gt;mentioned here&lt;/a&gt; before, MS is &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.com.com/2100-1045_3-1017126.html&quot;&gt;discontinuing&lt;/a&gt; the free version of IE for Mac, and offering it only as part of the MSN service instead. They also &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.com.com/2100-1032_3-1012943.html&quot;&gt;appear&lt;/a&gt; to be doing the same with IE for Windows. The &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.webstandards.org&quot;&gt;Web Standards Project&lt;/a&gt; is demanding that they include standards bugs in the list they are going to fix, because MS has always advertised IE as standards-compliant.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.26663</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2003 06:03:47 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Browser</category>
		<category>Bugs</category>
		<category>Fix</category>
		<category>Internet</category>
		<category>InternetExplorer</category>
		<category>Mac</category>
		<category>Microsoft</category>
		<category>Software</category>
		<category>WebStandards</category>
		<dc:creator>setmajer</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/12303/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://db.tidbits.com/getbits.acgi?tbart=06628"&gt;iTunes installer d&amp;#233;b&amp;#226;cle&lt;/a&gt; Backups are insufficiently sexy: &amp;#8220;This time Apple deserves the lion&amp;#8217;s share of the blame for creating an operating system that can&amp;#8217;t be backed up and restored reliably many months after the initial release. For this reason alone, Mac OS X cannot be considered acceptable for serious use in many situations&amp;#8221;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.12303</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2001 05:42:03 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>backups</category>
		<category>bugs</category>
		<category>installers</category>
		<category>itunes</category>
		<category>mac</category>
		<category>osx</category>
		<category>software</category>
		<dc:creator>joeclark</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/10800/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/cn/20010925/tc/gartner_companies_should_drop_iis_1.html"&gt;Gartner&apos;s opinion proliferates&lt;/a&gt;  into the mainstream Internet news sources. any further thoughts?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.10800</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2001 08:24:43 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bugs</category>
		<category>gartner</category>
		<category>iis</category>
		<category>mainstream</category>
		<category>microsoft</category>
		<category>opinion</category>
		<category>rewrite</category>
		<category>security</category>
		<category>software</category>
		<dc:creator>tatochip</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/9716/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.macromedia.com/"&gt;Rude Software Installation&lt;/a&gt; I clicked on a link that needed Shockwave 8.5 installed. Silly me, I said okay. After the download, the installation program nicely closed all of my open IE windows without first asking, creating a splendid loss of work for me!! Thanks Macromedia!! I&apos;m now going to be on the lookout... What other software programs act rudely, creating defaults, shutting down your browser windows, or assigning themselves to extensions without first asking?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.9716</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2001 07:59:49 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bugs</category>
		<category>installers</category>
		<category>macromedia</category>
		<category>shockwave</category>
		<category>software</category>
		<dc:creator>yarf</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/5816/</link>
		<description> The W3C opens a can of whoopass on the browser manufacturers with &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/NOTE-cuap-20010206&quot;&gt;this detailed list of bugs they&apos;d like to see remedied&lt;/a&gt;. Will this result in any changes whatsoever, or will Microsoft and Netscape continue to ignore what they &lt;i&gt;should&lt;/i&gt; be doing?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.5816</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2001 18:36:01 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>browser</category>
		<category>bugs</category>
		<category>microsoft</category>
		<category>netscape</category>
		<category>software</category>
		<category>w3c</category>
		<dc:creator>mathowie</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


