<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with bushfilter</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/bushfilter</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'bushfilter' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 12:35:14 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 12:35:14 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Remember Total Information Awareness?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/69773/Remember%2DTotal%2DInformation%2DAwareness</link>
		<description> Two years ago, then NSA-chief Gen. Michael Hayden said its domestic surveillance program was &quot;not a driftnet over Lackawanna or Fremont or Dearborn, grabbing all communications and then sifting them out.&quot;

Today, &lt;a href=&quot;http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120511973377523845.html?mod=hps_us_whats_news&quot;&gt;a story in the Wall Street Journal&lt;/a&gt; alleges this is precisely what is happening. &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Information_Awareness_Office&quot;&gt;Total Information Awareness&lt;/a&gt; seems to not have died, but to have just been quietly absorbed into the NSA&apos;s already extensive surveillance apparatus, all without the hassle of any kind of transparency or oversight.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.69773</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 12:35:14 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bushfilter</category>
		<category>newsfilter</category>
		<category>NSA</category>
		<category>outragefilter</category>
		<category>security</category>
		<category>spookfilter</category>
		<category>surveillance</category>
		<category>warrantlesswiretapping</category>
		<dc:creator>[expletive deleted]</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>OB/GYN Love</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/35441/OBGYN%2DLove</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/N06540712.htm"&gt;Does your OB/GYN practice his love on you?&lt;/a&gt; Apparently Mr. Bush thinks they&apos;re unable to do so because of trial lawyers like Mr. Edwards.  This is pretty amazing.  This is our president.  Wow.  Dude.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.35441</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2004 08:45:08 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>bushfilter</category>
		<category>GeorgeBush</category>
		<category>gwb</category>
		<category>gynecologists</category>
		<category>gynecology</category>
		<category>medical</category>
		<category>obgyn</category>
		<dc:creator>Shike</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/17206/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/business/newsid_1984000/1984459.stm"&gt;Unocal will get it&apos;s pipeline after all!&lt;/a&gt; I guess with all the grief Bush is getting about the warnings in August he can look forward to some happy phone calls from his oil buddies!  Oh by the way, Karzi used to work for Unocal.  Did the Pres. mention that when he appointed Karzi.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.17206</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2002 20:04:24 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Afghanistan2002</category>
		<category>Bushfilter</category>
		<category>gaspipeline</category>
		<category>Unocal</category>
		<dc:creator>bas67</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/13796/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/ap/20020113/ts/bush_health_3.html"&gt;President Bush fainted briefly in the White House residence Sunday after choking on a pretzel while watching the Baltimore-Miami playoff game on tv.&lt;/a&gt; Let the one liners begin...  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.13796</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2002 18:03:49 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bushfilter</category>
		<dc:creator>brian</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/5475/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=dumb+motherfucker"&gt;Google Editorializing?&lt;/a&gt; Someone forwarded me this search on google. Look at the first link. Is this pure editorializing or just dumb (pardon the pun) luck?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.5475</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2001 13:36:23 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bushfilter</category>
		<category>dumbmotherfucker</category>
		<category>googlefu</category>
		<dc:creator>TNLNYC</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


