<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with business and online</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/business+online</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'business' and 'online' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 05:30:34 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 05:30:34 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>A decade of digital music</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87962/A%2Ddecade%2Dof%2Ddigital%2Dmusic</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://musically.com/blog/2009/12/31/digital-music-timeline-2000-2009-the-decade-at-a-glance/"&gt;A decade of digital music&lt;/a&gt; Vaguely styled as a timeline, this end-of-the-decade blog post (from UK digital music news source &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.musically.com&quot;&gt;Music Ally&lt;/a&gt;) could prove valuable to anyone studying the music business or the intersection between entertainment and technology. The piece links to ten years of stories on digital music - from Napster through to Spotify - allowing us to look back on the issues without the 20/20 vision of hindsight. Gems include the &lt;a href=&quot;http://musically.com/blog/2009/12/21/the-digital-decade-2000/&quot;&gt;Bluematter scheme from Universal Records in 2000&lt;/a&gt;, which comprised 60 non-transferrable, non-burnable tracks for $1.99 each.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2010:site.87962</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 05:30:34 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>business</category>
		<category>decade</category>
		<category>digital</category>
		<category>history</category>
		<category>music</category>
		<category>online</category>
		<dc:creator>skylar</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The business of online loyalty programs</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/86776/The%2Dbusiness%2Dof%2Donline%2Dloyalty%2Dprograms</link>
		<description> A US Senate Committee just released its
&lt;a href=&quot;http://commerce.senate.gov/public/_files/111609STAFFREPORT.pdf&quot;&gt;report&lt;/a&gt; on &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.cnet.com/8301-1023_3-10399880-93.html&quot;&gt;online loyalty programs&lt;/a&gt;. Combined, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.webloyalty.com/about-customer-loyalty/&quot;&gt;Webloyalty&lt;/a&gt;,
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.affiniongroup.com/about-us/&quot;&gt;Affinion&lt;/a&gt;, and 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.vertrue.com/about.asp&quot;&gt;Vertrue&lt;/a&gt; have made $1.4 billion in the past ten years charging customers $10-$20/month for marketing program memberships. Unfortunately, many of their customers (4 million this year) have no memory of authorizing the charges. A key enabler for signups is merchants passing credit card numbers directly to the loyalty program; the customer never has to enter billing data. Such &quot;card on file&quot; transactions have a conversion rate of roughly 4% (compared to 1% without). &lt;a href=&quot;http://consumerist.com/5407374/88-big-sites-earning-millions-from-webloyalty-scam&quot;&gt;Many well-known Internet brands&lt;/a&gt; such as 1-800-Flowers, Classmates.com, Priceline, Expedia, Orbitz, Travelocity, Fandango, Buy.com, eHarmony, and Yahoo are paid $10 to $30 per signup to entice their customers to join the marketing programs.

There&apos;s been a &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affinion_Group#Complaints&quot;&gt;litany&lt;/a&gt; of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.consumeraffairs.com/news04/2006/05/ia_vertrue.html/&quot;&gt;lawsuits&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.xconomy.com/boston/2009/08/27/webloyalty-customers-eligible-for-payments-under-class-action-settlement/&quot;&gt;settlements&lt;/a&gt; for years about these programs. In response the marketing companies have promised to change their practices, in some cases &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.xconomy.com/boston/2009/08/27/webloyalty-customers-eligible-for-payments-under-class-action-settlement/attachment/webloyalty_offer_changes/&quot;&gt;meticulously documenting&lt;/a&gt; page layout changes. </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.86776</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 10:10:01 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>advertising</category>
		<category>business</category>
		<category>consumer</category>
		<category>creditcard</category>
		<category>marketing</category>
		<category>online</category>
		<dc:creator>Nelson</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>free online courses and education</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/67875/free%2Donline%2Dcourses%2Dand%2Deducation</link>
		<description> 10 Places to Get a&lt;a href=&quot;http://education-portal.com/articles/10_Places_to_Get_a_Free_Business_Education_Online.html&quot;&gt; Free Business Education Online&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.67875</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 19:25:48 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>business</category>
		<category>education</category>
		<category>free</category>
		<category>learning</category>
		<category>online</category>
		<dc:creator>nickyskye</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Is Vivid going to go out of business?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/67015/Is%2DVivid%2Dgoing%2Dto%2Dgo%2Dout%2Dof%2Dbusiness</link>
		<description> &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.portfolio.com/culture-lifestyle/culture-inc/arts/2007/10/15/YouPorn-Vivid-Entertainment-Profile/?print=true&quot;&gt;DVD sales are in free fall&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metro.co.uk/metrosexual/article.html?in_article_id=74638&amp;in_page_id=8&quot;&gt;Audiences &lt;/a&gt;are flocking to &lt;a href=&quot;http://redtube.com/&quot;&gt;pornographic knockoffs of YouTube &lt;/a&gt;[NSFW], especially a secretive site called &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youporn.com/?user_choice=Enter&quot;&gt;YouPorn&lt;/a&gt; [NSFW]. And&lt;/a&gt; the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.yuvutu.com/modules.php?name=Video&amp;op=view&amp;video_id=129221&quot;&gt;amateurs&lt;/a&gt; [NSFW]are taking over. What&#8217;s happening to the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.freetimes.com/stories/15/27/heporn-sheporn-iporn-youporn&quot;&gt;adult-entertainment industry is exactly what&#8217;s happening to its Hollywood counterpart&lt;/a&gt;&#8212;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=15631011&quot;&gt;only worse.&lt;/a&gt;&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.67015</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 00:12:12 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>business</category>
		<category>convergence</category>
		<category>online</category>
		<category>porn</category>
		<category>UserGeneratedContent</category>
		<category>video</category>
		<dc:creator>bigmusic</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>trendwatching</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/45233/trendwatching</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.trendwatching.com/homepage.htm&quot;&gt;Trendwatching&lt;/a&gt;    reports on &quot;emerging consumer trends and related new business ideas.&quot; It is packed with ideas and links for new online business concepts that are currently emerging. The language is marketingpersonbuzzspeak, but the ideas (with supporting website examples) are fascinating.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.45233</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2005 20:19:03 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>business</category>
		<category>buzz</category>
		<category>marketing</category>
		<category>online</category>
		<category>trend</category>
		<dc:creator>stbalbach</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/13231/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://americanpressinstitute.org/news.cfm?id=523"&gt;What is the future of online news. &lt;/a&gt; Will subscription eventually win through? Is there a viable business model that will allow independent publishers (such as Salon) to survive, or will we see further media consolidation? Where does blogging fit into this spectrum?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.13231</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2001 00:24:25 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>blogging</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>business</category>
		<category>impact</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>news</category>
		<category>online</category>
		<category>speculation</category>
		<dc:creator>RobertLoch</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/12997/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://pub54.ezboard.com/fkalidiscussionfrm1.showMessage?topicID=12.topic"&gt;Kali.net&lt;/a&gt; (once one of the world&apos;s largest Internet gaming networks) is created. Makes money. BeTech buys Kali to impress investors. BeTech stops paying for upkeep. ISPs get peeved. No more Kali. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.kali.net&quot;&gt;Or is there?&lt;/a&gt; Is this a funeral or a phoenix? And is there anything else on the &apos;Net about this? I&apos;m coming up with bupkus.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.12997</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2001 09:49:54 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>business</category>
		<category>entertainment</category>
		<category>gaming</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>Kali</category>
		<category>online</category>
		<dc:creator>ZachsMind</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/1797/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.tnl.net/newsletter/2000/boobust.asp"&gt;A former Boo.com employee describes some of the challenges they faced&lt;/a&gt; . Multiple currencies, multiple languages, on-the-fly tax calculation, integration with multiple fullfillment partners, no development plan, and ignorance of technology issues on the front end. Blech.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.1797</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 May 2000 21:16:37 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Boo</category>
		<category>Boo.com</category>
		<category>business</category>
		<category>eCommerce</category>
		<category>Europe</category>
		<category>failure</category>
		<category>online</category>
		<category>shopping</category>
		<dc:creator>Calebos</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


