<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with campaignfinancereform and CampaignFinance</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/campaignfinancereform+CampaignFinance</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'campaignfinancereform' and 'CampaignFinance' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 10:15:51 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 10:15:51 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>New Supreme Court Opinions</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/62369/New%2DSupreme%2DCourt%2DOpinions</link>
		<description> A very big day for the Supreme Court.  In &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.scotusblog.com/movabletype/archives/06-278_All.pdf&quot;&gt;Morse v. Fredrick&lt;/a&gt;, the Court ruled that a school could suspend a child for holding up a &quot;Bong HiTs for Jesus&quot; banner. (Previous post &lt;a title=&quot;See astute and prophetic comments therein from monju_bosatsu and... another user that were unfairly chastised.&quot; href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/54305/The-Limits-of-Free-Speech-in-Schools&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;).  In &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.scotusblog.com/movabletype/archives/06-157_All.pdf&quot;&gt;Hein v. Freedom from Religion&lt;/a&gt;, the Court held that taxpayers lacked standing to challenged Faith Based Initiatives  (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/54102/Separation-of-church-and-state&quot;&gt;previous&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/comments.mefi/50288&quot;&gt;discussions&lt;/a&gt;).  In &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.scotusblog.com/movabletype/archives/06-219_All.pdf&quot;&gt;Wilke v. Robbins&lt;/a&gt;, the Court held that land owners do not have Bivens claims if the federal government harasses landowners for easements.  In &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.scotusblog.com/movabletype/archives/06-969_All.pdf&quot;&gt;FEC v. Wisconsin Right to Life&lt;/a&gt;, the Court held that the portion of the campaign finance law which had blackout periods before elections on issue advocacy advertising was an unconstitutional restriction of speech (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/comments.mefi/52560&quot;&gt;other&lt;/a&gt;).  This Thursday, the Justices will deliver their last opinions of the term, including &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.oyez.org/cases/2000-2009/2006/2006_06_6407/&quot;&gt;a death penalty case&lt;/a&gt; and the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.oyez.org/cases/2000-2009/2006/2006_05_908/&quot;&gt;school &lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.oyez.org/cases/2000-2009/2006/2006_05_915/&quot;&gt;assignment cases&lt;/a&gt;. (Opinions are .pdfs)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.62369</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 10:15:51 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bethel</category>
		<category>bethelvfraser</category>
		<category>bivens</category>
		<category>bivensclaims</category>
		<category>BuckleyvValeo</category>
		<category>campaign</category>
		<category>campaignfinance</category>
		<category>campaignfinancereform</category>
		<category>constitution</category>
		<category>constitutional</category>
		<category>court</category>
		<category>deathpenalty</category>
		<category>drugadvocacy</category>
		<category>easements</category>
		<category>establishmentclause</category>
		<category>faithbasedinitiative</category>
		<category>federalgovernment</category>
		<category>finance</category>
		<category>firstamendment</category>
		<category>FlastvCohen</category>
		<category>fraser</category>
		<category>free</category>
		<category>freedomofreligion</category>
		<category>freespeech</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>legal</category>
		<category>McCain-Feingold</category>
		<category>McConnellvFEC</category>
		<category>opinions</category>
		<category>Panetti</category>
		<category>politicalspeech</category>
		<category>schoolassignmentcases</category>
		<category>schooldiscipline</category>
		<category>somanytags</category>
		<category>speech</category>
		<category>standing</category>
		<category>supreme</category>
		<category>supremecourt</category>
		<category>tinker</category>
		<category>tinkervdesmoines</category>
		<dc:creator>dios</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/14148/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2002/01/24/politics/24CND-CAMP.html"&gt;Is this a real chance at campaign finance reform&lt;/a&gt; or are we just in for more partisan back and forth that in the end won&apos;t change much of anything? (NY Times link) And how long will the &quot;Enron effect&quot; last?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.14148</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2002 03:47:21 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>campaign</category>
		<category>CampaignFinance</category>
		<category>CampaignFinanceReform</category>
		<category>campaigns</category>
		<category>Congress</category>
		<category>funding</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>NYTimes</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<dc:creator>willrich</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/13657/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/ucrr/20020104/cm/campaign_finance_reform_joke_of_the_nation_1.html"&gt;Richard Reeve calls campaign finance reform &quot;Joke of a Nation&quot;.&lt;/a&gt; Sadly enough, he backs it up with some good points.  Is a city, state, or national office going to become the new status symbol of conspicuous consumers?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.13657</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2002 10:57:01 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>campaignfinance</category>
		<category>campaignfinancereform</category>
		<category>elections</category>
		<category>money</category>
		<category>moneytalks</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<dc:creator>Ufez Jones</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/6429/</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.msnbc.com/news/544229.asp&quot;&gt;Campaign finance reform gets 2 weeks of debate in the Senate starting today.&lt;/a&gt;  It has become a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.msnbc.com/news/521161.asp&quot;&gt;battle between the McCain-Feingold bill and the Dubya-D-40 backed Hagel-Landrieu bill&lt;/a&gt;. Will anything meaningful get passed? Will it matter if it does?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.6429</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2001 06:24:36 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>campaignfinance</category>
		<category>campaignfinancereform</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>Senate</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<dc:creator>quirked</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


