<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with campaignfinancereform</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/campaignfinancereform</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'campaignfinancereform' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 10:15:51 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 10:15:51 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>New Supreme Court Opinions</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/62369/New%2DSupreme%2DCourt%2DOpinions</link>
		<description> A very big day for the Supreme Court.  In &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.scotusblog.com/movabletype/archives/06-278_All.pdf&quot;&gt;Morse v. Fredrick&lt;/a&gt;, the Court ruled that a school could suspend a child for holding up a &quot;Bong HiTs for Jesus&quot; banner. (Previous post &lt;a title=&quot;See astute and prophetic comments therein from monju_bosatsu and... another user that were unfairly chastised.&quot; href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/54305/The-Limits-of-Free-Speech-in-Schools&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;).  In &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.scotusblog.com/movabletype/archives/06-157_All.pdf&quot;&gt;Hein v. Freedom from Religion&lt;/a&gt;, the Court held that taxpayers lacked standing to challenged Faith Based Initiatives  (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/54102/Separation-of-church-and-state&quot;&gt;previous&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/comments.mefi/50288&quot;&gt;discussions&lt;/a&gt;).  In &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.scotusblog.com/movabletype/archives/06-219_All.pdf&quot;&gt;Wilke v. Robbins&lt;/a&gt;, the Court held that land owners do not have Bivens claims if the federal government harasses landowners for easements.  In &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.scotusblog.com/movabletype/archives/06-969_All.pdf&quot;&gt;FEC v. Wisconsin Right to Life&lt;/a&gt;, the Court held that the portion of the campaign finance law which had blackout periods before elections on issue advocacy advertising was an unconstitutional restriction of speech (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/comments.mefi/52560&quot;&gt;other&lt;/a&gt;).  This Thursday, the Justices will deliver their last opinions of the term, including &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.oyez.org/cases/2000-2009/2006/2006_06_6407/&quot;&gt;a death penalty case&lt;/a&gt; and the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.oyez.org/cases/2000-2009/2006/2006_05_908/&quot;&gt;school &lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.oyez.org/cases/2000-2009/2006/2006_05_915/&quot;&gt;assignment cases&lt;/a&gt;. (Opinions are .pdfs)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.62369</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 10:15:51 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bethel</category>
		<category>bethelvfraser</category>
		<category>bivens</category>
		<category>bivensclaims</category>
		<category>BuckleyvValeo</category>
		<category>campaign</category>
		<category>campaignfinance</category>
		<category>campaignfinancereform</category>
		<category>constitution</category>
		<category>constitutional</category>
		<category>court</category>
		<category>deathpenalty</category>
		<category>drugadvocacy</category>
		<category>easements</category>
		<category>establishmentclause</category>
		<category>faithbasedinitiative</category>
		<category>federalgovernment</category>
		<category>finance</category>
		<category>firstamendment</category>
		<category>FlastvCohen</category>
		<category>fraser</category>
		<category>free</category>
		<category>freedomofreligion</category>
		<category>freespeech</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>legal</category>
		<category>McCain-Feingold</category>
		<category>McConnellvFEC</category>
		<category>opinions</category>
		<category>Panetti</category>
		<category>politicalspeech</category>
		<category>schoolassignmentcases</category>
		<category>schooldiscipline</category>
		<category>somanytags</category>
		<category>speech</category>
		<category>standing</category>
		<category>supreme</category>
		<category>supremecourt</category>
		<category>tinker</category>
		<category>tinkervdesmoines</category>
		<dc:creator>dios</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Then I&apos;ll get on my knees and pray ... we don&apos;t get fooled again. No, no...</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/53279/Then%2DIll%2Dget%2Don%2Dmy%2Dknees%2Dand%2Dpray%2Dwe%2Ddont%2Dget%2Dfooled%2Dagain%2DNo%2Dno</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.reason.com/hod/mh072006.shtml"&gt;Straight Talk Is Cheap: How John McCain became the capo of the new, reformed campaign finance syndicate.&lt;/a&gt; &quot;McCain isn&apos;t breaking any campaign finance laws. He wrote them so he wouldn&apos;t have to. But he&apos;s guilty of campaigning in exactly the manner he asserts is harming our nation. Senator McCain isn&apos;t reforming Washington. He is Washington.&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.53279</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2006 14:12:18 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>campaignfinancereform</category>
		<category>hopelessness</category>
		<category>johnmccain</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>washington</category>
		<dc:creator>ZenMasterThis</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Send me someplace sunny...</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/36254/Send%2Dme%2Dsomeplace%2Dsunny</link>
		<description> &lt;strong&gt;Campaign Contributions and U.S. Ambassadors &lt;/strong&gt; &lt;br&gt;&lt;strong&gt;In 1972&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;em&gt;President Nixon appointed thirteen noncareer ambassadors to Western European countries; eight of them had contributed at least $50,000 to his reelection campaign...&lt;/em&gt;&lt;small&gt;(&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.socialstudieshelp.com/APGOV_Campaigns_Elections.htm&quot;&gt;-Source&lt;/a&gt;, scroll to item 2.)&lt;/small&gt; &lt;br&gt;&lt;strong&gt;In 1980&lt;/strong&gt; a federal law was created to combat this, stating that ambassadors must &lt;em&gt;&quot;possess clearly demonstrated competence, including, to the maximum extent practicable, a useful knowledge of the principal language or dialect of the country in which the individual is to serve, and knowledge and understanding of the history, the culture, the economic and political institutions and the interest of that country and its people. &#8230; Contributions to political campaigns should not be a factor in the appointment.&quot;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Currently&lt;/strong&gt; 1/4 to 1/3 of U.S. Ambassadors are noncareer appointees, not experienced diplomats, causing criticism &lt;em&gt;since the attacks on the Pentagon and the World Trade Center. Critics point out that neither the Pentagon, the CIA nor any other U.S. government agency must shoulder the burden of a significant cadre of &quot;nonprofessionals&quot; encumbering senior field positions.&lt;/em&gt; &lt;small&gt;(&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.insightmag.com/main.cfm?include=detail&amp;storyid=258773&quot;&gt;-Source.&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/small&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.opensecrets.org/bush/ambassadors/index.asp#table&quot;&gt;HERE &lt;/a&gt;&lt;strong&gt;is the current tally of Embassy Row and their campaign contributions&lt;/strong&gt;, including &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.opensecrets.org/bush/ambassadors/randt.asp&quot;&gt;Clark Randt, Jr&lt;/a&gt;, former Geo W Yale fraternity brother who defended Bush against drug allegations during Bush&apos;s last campaign. &quot;Rangers&quot; and &quot;Pioneers&quot; abound. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mauritius.net/&quot;&gt;Mauritius &lt;/a&gt;is sunny, tropical, and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.opensecrets.org/bush/ambassadors/price.asp&quot;&gt;expensive&lt;/a&gt;.
 &lt;small&gt;(Inspired by &lt;a href=&quot;http://ask.metafilter.com/mefi/10887&quot;&gt;this &lt;/a&gt;AskMe question.) &lt;/small&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.36254</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2004 10:07:06 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>ambassadors</category>
		<category>campaignfinancereform</category>
		<category>clarkrandt</category>
		<category>diplomacy</category>
		<category>foreignservice</category>
		<category>georgewbush</category>
		<category>money</category>
		<category>nixon</category>
		<category>politicalappointments</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>richardnixon</category>
		<dc:creator>Shane</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Trickle Down Political Fundraising</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/34188/Trickle%2DDown%2DPolitical%2DFundraising</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://signup.cj.com/member/brandedPublisherSignUp.do?air_refmerchantid=1422274"&gt;By the way, you&apos;ll earn 30% of each donation you bring in for the RNC.&lt;/a&gt; The people who brought you &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/32746&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;fun customized campaign posters&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; return for an encore with an affiliate program for fundraising. Rather than relying upon &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.oliverwillis.com/entries/0704/paying_for_donations.html&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;real grassroots fundraising&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, why not just &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.revenews.com/brianclark/archives/000087.html&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;offer commissions to anyone&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; who&apos;d like to promote your candidate? Just how many ways can the Internet come up with to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fec.gov/finance_law.html&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;violate campaign finance law&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;? Ready ... set ... link!  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.34188</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2004 06:05:42 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>campaignfinancereform</category>
		<category>campaigns</category>
		<category>donations</category>
		<category>fundraising</category>
		<category>grassroots</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>reform</category>
		<category>rnc</category>
		<dc:creator>bclark</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/15958/</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/opinion/columns/willgeorge/&quot;&gt;George F. Will&lt;/a&gt;, a professed conservative, has criticized President Bush, not &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A51906-2002Mar6.html&quot;&gt;once&lt;/a&gt; (on steel tarrifs), not &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A17177-2002Mar25.html&quot;&gt;twice&lt;/a&gt; (on policy towards Israel), but &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A38392-2002Mar29.html&quot;&gt;thrice&lt;/a&gt; (on campaign finance reform) this month.  Am I missing something, or is Bush not adequately protecting his right flank?  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Granted, Will is a conservative of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dictionary.com/cgi-bin/dict.pl?term=tory&amp;r=67&quot;&gt;tory&lt;/a&gt; variety, but it&apos;s still a noticeable change in tenor since &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A7013-2001Aug13.html&quot;&gt;fawning over Bush&apos;s decision on stem-cell research&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.15958</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Mar 2002 03:49:39 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>campaignfinancereform</category>
		<category>conservatives</category>
		<category>foreignpolicy</category>
		<category>georgefwill</category>
		<category>georgewbush</category>
		<category>steeltariffs</category>
		<category>stemcellresearch</category>
		<category>tories</category>
		<dc:creator>sillygwailo</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/14703/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&amp;amp;u=/ap/20020212/ap_on_go_co/campaign_finance_61"&gt;House set to vote on campaign finance reform&lt;/a&gt; It would be the biggest overhaul of the nation&apos;s campaign finance laws since Watergate. &quot;We should win it,&quot; Shays, R-Conn., said Monday. &quot;We&apos;ve had the votes in the past and, frankly, I think our cause is just.&quot; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.businessweek.com/bwdaily/dnflash/feb2002/nf20020212_7571.htm&quot;&gt;Some&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2002/02/12/politics/12DONA.html&quot;&gt;people&lt;/a&gt; are against it.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.14703</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2002 07:53:46 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>campaignfinancereform</category>
		<category>campaigns</category>
		<category>elections</category>
		<category>finances</category>
		<category>funding</category>
		<category>reform</category>
		<dc:creator>kliuless</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/14148/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2002/01/24/politics/24CND-CAMP.html"&gt;Is this a real chance at campaign finance reform&lt;/a&gt; or are we just in for more partisan back and forth that in the end won&apos;t change much of anything? (NY Times link) And how long will the &quot;Enron effect&quot; last?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.14148</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2002 03:47:21 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>campaign</category>
		<category>CampaignFinance</category>
		<category>CampaignFinanceReform</category>
		<category>campaigns</category>
		<category>Congress</category>
		<category>funding</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>NYTimes</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<dc:creator>willrich</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/13657/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/ucrr/20020104/cm/campaign_finance_reform_joke_of_the_nation_1.html"&gt;Richard Reeve calls campaign finance reform &quot;Joke of a Nation&quot;.&lt;/a&gt; Sadly enough, he backs it up with some good points.  Is a city, state, or national office going to become the new status symbol of conspicuous consumers?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.13657</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2002 10:57:01 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>campaignfinance</category>
		<category>campaignfinancereform</category>
		<category>elections</category>
		<category>money</category>
		<category>moneytalks</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<dc:creator>Ufez Jones</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/6429/</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.msnbc.com/news/544229.asp&quot;&gt;Campaign finance reform gets 2 weeks of debate in the Senate starting today.&lt;/a&gt;  It has become a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.msnbc.com/news/521161.asp&quot;&gt;battle between the McCain-Feingold bill and the Dubya-D-40 backed Hagel-Landrieu bill&lt;/a&gt;. Will anything meaningful get passed? Will it matter if it does?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.6429</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2001 06:24:36 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>campaignfinance</category>
		<category>campaignfinancereform</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>Senate</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<dc:creator>quirked</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


