<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with candidates and politics</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/candidates+politics</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'candidates' and 'politics' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 20:28:04 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 20:28:04 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Will They Make The World An Offer It Can&apos;t Refuse?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/71235/Will%2DThey%2DMake%2DThe%2DWorld%2DAn%2DOffer%2DIt%2DCant%2DRefuse</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nationalinterest.org/Article.aspx?id=17008&quot;&gt;Pax Corleone Americana?&lt;/a&gt; &quot;Can any of the candidates vying to become the next president of the United States match Michael&#8217;s cool, dispassionate courage in the face of epochal change? Will they avoid living in the comforting embrace of the past, from which both Tom and Sonny ultimately could not escape? Or will they emulate Michael&#8217;s flexibility&#8212;to preserve America&#8217;s position in a dangerous world?&quot; &lt;i&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0068646/&quot;&gt;The Godfather&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/i&gt; as metaphor.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.71235</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 20:28:04 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>candidates</category>
		<category>metaphor</category>
		<category>peace</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>presidentialelection</category>
		<category>thegodfather</category>
		<category>US</category>
		<category>worldaffairs</category>
		<dc:creator>amyms</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Who should I vote for?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/68786/Who%2Dshould%2DI%2Dvote%2Dfor</link>
		<description> A little lost coming up to the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thegreenpapers.com/P08/events.phtml?s=c&quot;&gt;Presidential Primary&lt;/a&gt;? &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.electoralcompass.com/&quot;&gt;The Electoral Compass&lt;/a&gt; is a brief set of questions that matches your choices with the candidate whose positions are the closest to yours. &lt;em&gt;Discover your position in the political landscape for the US presidential election 2008&lt;/em&gt;. Also: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.politicalcompass.org/&quot;&gt;Political Compass&lt;/a&gt; </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.68786</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 11:38:06 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>2008</category>
		<category>candidates</category>
		<category>election</category>
		<category>elections</category>
		<category>electoralcompass</category>
		<category>politicalcompass</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>presidency</category>
		<dc:creator>nickyskye</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>(affair, divorce, affair, divorce)</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/52438/affair%2Ddivorce%2Daffair%2Ddivorce</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/features/2006/0607.benen.html"&gt;the most maritally challenged crop of presidential hopefuls in American political history&lt;/a&gt; --meet 3 leading GOP candidates for 08. We&apos;ve already read about &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2006/05/23/nyregion/23clintons.html?ex=1306036800&amp;en=9147b84160d6cfb4&amp;ei=5088&amp;partner=rssnyt&amp;emc=rss&quot;&gt;Hillary&apos;s sexlife&lt;/a&gt; (or lack thereof), but will the double standard hold? &lt;i&gt;...if the top three Democratic presidential hopefuls each had extra-marital affairs in their backgrounds, it stands to reason that Republicans would have something to say about it--and if the past is any guide, those concerns would find their way into the papers.&lt;/i&gt; Will the same happen when it&apos;s about the &quot;party of family values and morality&quot;?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.52438</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2006 20:57:48 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>affairs</category>
		<category>candidates</category>
		<category>divorce</category>
		<category>GOP</category>
		<category>hypocrisy</category>
		<category>lies</category>
		<category>morals</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>Republican</category>
		<category>sex</category>
		<category>sleaze</category>
		<category>values</category>
		<category>voters</category>
		<dc:creator>amberglow</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Get your Political Ad On</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/35400/Get%2Dyour%2DPolitical%2DAd%2DOn</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.uiowa.edu/~commstud/resources/pol_ads.html"&gt;A fantastic clearinghouse for thinking about political advertising&lt;/a&gt; can be found courtesy of the University of Iowa&apos;s Department of Communication Studies.  Links include the previously &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/33696&quot;&gt;discussed&lt;/a&gt; wonder &quot;The Living Room Candidate&quot; and even advertising consulting firms.  Pretty good reading, with enough links to keep you busy for a while.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.35400</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2004 10:37:23 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>ads</category>
		<category>advertising</category>
		<category>candidates</category>
		<category>communications</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<dc:creator>hank_14</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>DontvoteRalph.net</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/33910/DontvoteRalphnet</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.dontvoteralph.net/start.htm#"&gt;DontvoteRalph.net&lt;/a&gt; &quot;Look at just a few of those who supported Nader in 2000, but see that this year is crucially different: Noam Chomsky, Ben Cohen, Peter Coyote, Phil Donahue, Ronnie Dugger, Jim Hightower, Robert McChesney, Michael Moore, and Bonnie Raitt. In fact, can you think of a prominent supporter from 2000 who supports him in 2004? Are we all members of Nader&#8217;s &#8220;liberal inteligentsia&#8221;? Or is the Bush presidency simply such a disaster that we realize there is only one responsible action for real progressives? Despite Mr. Nader&#8217;s inevitable disagreement, we don&#8217;t think everyone is out of step but Ralph.&quot; | So who is supporting Nader? &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dailykos.com/story/2004/6/23/191738/167&quot;&gt;Some think its the GOP.&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.33910</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2004 23:17:57 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>candidates</category>
		<category>disagreement</category>
		<category>gop</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>presidentialelection</category>
		<category>progressives</category>
		<category>ralphnader</category>
		<category>supporters</category>
		<dc:creator>skallas</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Candidate Blogs</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/27649/Candidate%2DBlogs</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2003/08/13/opinion/13DOWD.html"&gt;Dem Blogs&lt;/a&gt; This community is filled with bloggers and I wondered if anyone had seen Maureen O&apos;Dowd&apos;s take on how the Presidential Candidates are starting to use, for better or worse, &quot;blogging&quot; as a method to get their &quot;message&quot; across. ( Registration required )  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.27649</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2003 20:22:18 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>blogging</category>
		<category>blogs</category>
		<category>candidates</category>
		<category>Democrats</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>NYTimes</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>presidential</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<dc:creator>RubberHen</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/9692/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.bernieformayor.com/"&gt;Bernie for mayor!&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.kramerformayor.com/&quot;&gt;Kramer For Mayor! &lt;/a&gt; NY has a lot of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2001/08/28/nyregion/28MAYO.html&quot;&gt;choices&lt;/a&gt; for mayor.
 </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.9692</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2001 09:43:06 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>BernieGoetz</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>candidates</category>
		<category>election</category>
		<category>KennyKramer</category>
		<category>Kramer</category>
		<category>mayor</category>
		<category>municipal</category>
		<category>NewYorkCity</category>
		<category>NYC</category>
		<category>NYTimes</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<dc:creator>chainring</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/3902/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.kcstar.com/item/pages/opinion.pat,opinion/3774dde2.a26,.html"&gt;A better way to select party candidates.&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt;Instead of holding silly primaries that end up picking the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.algore.com&quot;&gt;worst&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.georgebush.com&quot;&gt;possible&lt;/a&gt; candidates from each party, why not have party leaders pick the best 3-4 candidates and then have registered party members vote (by mail or at the convention) and announce the winner in August? [more inside]  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.3902</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2000 06:40:17 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>candidates</category>
		<category>elections</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>primaries</category>
		<category>voterreform</category>
		<category>voters</category>
		<category>voting</category>
		<dc:creator>daveadams</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/420/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.selectsmart.com/PRESIDENT/"&gt;After answering a few questions here,&lt;/a&gt; a presidential candidate with the traits closest to what you specified will appear as your best choice. My choice came up as Bill Bradley, which seemed funny to me. Thanks to Ronald Reagan, I ignore former actors, musicians, and sports stars in political races. I had no idea Bradley stood for the things I support. Looks like I&apos;ll have to break the rules and watch this guy.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,1999:site.420</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 1999 01:08:49 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>candidates</category>
		<category>elections</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>quizzes</category>
		<category>surveys</category>
		<category>tests</category>
		<dc:creator>mathowie</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


