<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with capitalism and China</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/capitalism+China</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'capitalism' and 'China' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 19:42:21 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 19:42:21 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>George Soros on the Way Forward</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/86885/George%2DSoros%2Don%2Dthe%2DWay%2DForward</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.ft.com/indepth/soros-lectures"&gt;Soros lectures&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt;You can &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ft.com/cms/668e074a-bf24-11de-a696-00144feab49a.html?_i_referralObject=11018787&quot;&gt;slog through the video&lt;/a&gt;, but I preferred the transcripts &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0ca06172-bfe9-11de-aed2-00144feab49a.html&quot;&gt;1&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ft.com/cms/dbc0e0c6-bfe9-11de-aed2-00144feab49a.html&quot;&gt;2&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/5714b216-bfea-11de-aed2-00144feab49a.html&quot;&gt;3&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/d55926e8-bfea-11de-aed2-00144feab49a,dwp_uuid=90bc6a02-bf0b-11de-8034-00144feab49a.html&quot;&gt;4&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/2ee0b622-bfeb-11de-aed2-00144feab49a.html&quot;&gt;5&lt;/a&gt; &lt;small&gt;+ to me, it started off rather abstract* (admittedly on his part) and slow (covered ground; note soros tag) and doesn&apos;t really get interesting until 3 -- &quot;The event that forced me to thoroughly reconsider the concept of open society was the re-election of President Bush...&quot; [altho he can get a bit arrogant (&quot;even I, who discovered&#8212;or invented&#8212;reflexivity, failed to recognize...&quot;)] -- and gets better from there... so i&apos;d skip to that if you&apos;re so inclined :P&lt;/small&gt;

kinda &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/76580/laws-of-human-stupidity&quot;&gt;previously&lt;/a&gt;...

and btw, as a bonus, also see...
- &lt;a href=&quot;http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/11/20/why-do-we-hate/&quot;&gt;Why Do We Hate?&lt;/a&gt;
- &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.esquire.com/print-this/world-poverty-map-1209&quot;&gt;What Makes a Nation Rich?&lt;/a&gt; 
- &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.skidelskyr.com/site/article/how-much-is-enough/&quot;&gt;How Much Is Enough?&lt;/a&gt;
- &lt;a href=&quot;http://delong.typepad.com/sdj/2009/11/what-the-us-long-bond-market-is-telling-us.html&quot;&gt;What the U.S. Long Bond Market Is Telling Us&lt;/a&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.reuters.com/rolfe-winkler/2009/11/20/krugman-on-the-invisible-bond-vigilantes/&quot;&gt;cf&lt;/a&gt;.) 
- &lt;a href=&quot;http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2009/11/chart-of-the-day-8.html&quot;&gt;The G20 in 2050&lt;/a&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/imagepages/2009/11/14/weekinreview/15chinagready.html&quot;&gt;viz&lt;/a&gt;.)  
- &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/newsnight/paulmason/2009/11/rare_earth_the_new_great_game.html&quot;&gt;Rare earth: The New Great Game&lt;/a&gt; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.moneycontrol.com/news/current-affairs/rare-earth-elements_426341.html&quot;&gt;1&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/75fe65ce-4c4e-11de-a6c5-00144feabdc0,dwp_uuid=e8477cc4-c820-11db-b0dc-000b5df10621.html&quot;&gt;2&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newscientist.com/articleimages/mg19426051.200/2-earths-natural-wealth-an-audit.html&quot;&gt;3&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.zerohedge.com/article/guest-post-why-all-fuss-over-rare-earths&quot;&gt;4&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/comment/ambroseevans_pritchard/6082464/World-faces-hi-tech-crunch-as-China-eyes-ban-on-rare-metal-exports.html&quot;&gt;5&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;a href=&quot;http://thomaspmbarnett.com/weblog/2009/10/latest_chinese_resource_war_se.html&quot;&gt;6&lt;/a&gt;]

---
&lt;small&gt;*in fleshing out his concept of reflexivity he goes thru (among other things and in other words) descriptive vs. prescriptive (or normative) theories, instrumental rationality and empiricism, false thinking and truthiness, the law of unintended consequences, &amp;amp;c. so if you&apos;re into that sort of stuff... have at it!&lt;/small&gt; </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.86885</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 19:42:21 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>capitalism</category>
		<category>china</category>
		<category>complexity</category>
		<category>cooperation</category>
		<category>democracy</category>
		<category>development</category>
		<category>economics</category>
		<category>finance</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>markets</category>
		<category>morals</category>
		<category>nation</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>progress</category>
		<category>socialism</category>
		<category>society</category>
		<category>soros</category>
		<category>state</category>
		<category>systems</category>
		<category>us</category>
		<dc:creator>kliuless</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Adam Smith in Beijing</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/76380/Adam%2DSmith%2Din%2DBeijing</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.archive.org/details/2640Arrighi"&gt;Adam Smith in Beijing&lt;/a&gt; &lt;small&gt;Embedded Flash film 1hr59mins&lt;/small&gt; &quot;Is US power in decline?  What are we to make of the rise of China?  Will a possible equalization of North-South relations herald a more brutal capitalism or a better world?  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.soc.jhu.edu/people/arrighi/&quot;&gt;Giovanni Arrighi&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.soc.jhu.edu/people/Andreas/index.html&quot;&gt;Joel Andreas&lt;/a&gt;, and &lt;a href=&quot;http://davidharvey.org/&quot;&gt;David Harvey&lt;/a&gt; give their perspectives in this forum, for a discussion of Arrighi&apos;s 2007 book &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.versobooks.com/books/ab/a-titles/arrighi_g_adam_smith_beijing.shtml&quot;&gt;&lt;i&gt;Adam Smith in Beijing&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.  The event, filmed in Baltimore, MD, in March of 2008, was organized by the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.redemmas.org&quot;&gt;Red Emma&apos;s collective&lt;/a&gt;.&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.76380</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 10:21:59 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>AdamSmith</category>
		<category>Arrighi</category>
		<category>capitalism</category>
		<category>China</category>
		<category>economics</category>
		<category>GiovanniArrighi</category>
		<category>globalisation</category>
		<category>globalization</category>
		<category>history</category>
		<category>neoliberalism</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<dc:creator>Abiezer</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Disaster Capitalism</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/74196/Disaster%2DCapitalism</link>
		<description> &lt;em&gt;&quot;Like the dotcom bubble, the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2007/09/10/3726/&quot;&gt;disaster bubble&lt;/a&gt; is inflating in an ad-hoc and chaotic fashion.&quot;&lt;/em&gt; Journalist Naomi Klein discusses how corporations and governments are working together more closely than ever, using the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.avclub.com/content/interview/naomi_klein&quot;&gt;mandate of catastrophe&lt;/a&gt; &#8212; whether&amp;#0160;natural or man-made &#8212; to further concentrate power in fewer hands, with less oversight: from &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.democracynow.org/2008/8/15/mccommunism_naomi_klein_and_christian_parenti&quot;&gt;illegal sales of American police technology&lt;/a&gt; to China to avert hypothetical tragedies during the Beijing Olympics, to the &lt;a href=&quot;http://international.uiowa.edu/accents/08spring/price-water.asp&quot;&gt;privatization of water supplies&lt;/a&gt; in post-tsunami Sri Lanka.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.74196</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 05:35:26 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>911</category>
		<category>accountability</category>
		<category>capitalism</category>
		<category>china</category>
		<category>congress</category>
		<category>corporatism</category>
		<category>democracy</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>katrina</category>
		<category>klein</category>
		<category>naomiklein</category>
		<category>olympics</category>
		<category>oversight</category>
		<category>power</category>
		<category>srilanka</category>
		<category>tiananmen</category>
		<category>water</category>
		<dc:creator>Blazecock Pileon</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The &apos;advantage&apos; of &apos;low human rights&apos;</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/68027/The%2Dadvantage%2Dof%2Dlow%2Dhuman%2Drights</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://business.smh.com.au/chinas-economic-power-needs-the-party/20080106-1kg4.html"&gt;Only China can destroy socialism.&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://newleftreview.org/A2441&quot;&gt;Qin Hui&lt;/a&gt;, one of the country&apos;s most important public intellectuals, argues &quot;China&apos;s rampant state-dominated, welfare-lite capitalism could so undercut competitors that it could threaten the social democratic traditions that underpin the West.&quot; &lt;small&gt;[&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.danwei.org/from_the_web/danwei_picks_20080108.php&quot;&gt;As ever, via.&lt;/a&gt;]&lt;/small&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.68027</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 23:14:18 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>capitalism</category>
		<category>China</category>
		<category>QinHui</category>
		<category>socialism</category>
		<dc:creator>Abiezer</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The Rise of China</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/67792/The%2DRise%2Dof%2DChina</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.foreignaffairs.org/20080101faessay87102/g-john-ikenberry/the-rise-of-china-and-the-future-of-the-west.html"&gt;The Rise of China and the Future of the West: Can the Liberal System Survive?&lt;/a&gt; &quot;China&apos;s rise will inevitably bring the United States&apos; unipolar moment to an end. But that does not necessarily mean a violent power struggle or the overthrow of the Western system. The U.S.-led international order can remain dominant even while integrating a more powerful China -- but only if Washington sets about strengthening that liberal order now.&quot; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.foreignaffairs.org/20080101faessay87101/john-l-thornton/long-time-coming.html&quot;&gt;Long Time Coming: The Prospects for Democracy in China.&lt;/a&gt; &quot;Is China democratizing? The country&apos;s leaders do not think of democracy as people in the West generally do, but they are increasingly backing local elections, judicial independence, and oversight of Chinese Communist Party officials. How far China&apos;s liberalization will ultimately go and what Chinese politics will look like when it stops are open questions.&quot;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.foreignpolicy.com/story/cms.php?story_id=4000&quot;&gt;The Battle of Beijing: What happens when an authoritarian government and thousands of activists go head-to-head at the Olympics? China is about to find out.&lt;/a&gt; </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.67792</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 14:01:06 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Capitalism</category>
		<category>China</category>
		<category>Communism</category>
		<category>Conflict</category>
		<category>Democracy</category>
		<category>Economics</category>
		<category>Globalization</category>
		<category>History</category>
		<category>InternationalRelations</category>
		<category>Politics</category>
		<dc:creator>homunculus</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Of course, the frames are probably made from Chinese toothpaste...</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/64861/Of%2Dcourse%2Dthe%2Dframes%2Dare%2Dprobably%2Dmade%2Dfrom%2DChinese%2Dtoothpaste</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://zennioptical.com/cart/home.php&quot;&gt;A selection of eyeglasses for $8.&lt;/a&gt;  (That&apos;s including your lens prescription.)  Or if that&apos;s not to your liking, there&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.39dollarglasses.com/&quot;&gt;$39.&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.64861</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 20:24:01 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>adamsmithsinvisiblehandjustbitchslappedme</category>
		<category>bargains</category>
		<category>capitalism</category>
		<category>cheap</category>
		<category>china</category>
		<category>eyeglasses</category>
		<category>glasses</category>
		<category>ihaveafunnyfeelingaboutthis</category>
		<category>Luxottica</category>
		<category>monopolies</category>
		<category>ridiculouslycheap</category>
		<dc:creator>Arthur &quot;Two Sheds&quot; Jackson</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Win In China!</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/59300/Win%2DIn%2DChina</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.rutledgecapital.com/Articles/200610_wsj_win_in_china.html"&gt;Win in China!&lt;/a&gt; A &quot;reality&quot; TV show in China where young would be entrepreneurs compete for a large pile of startup cash to actualize their business ideas.  Not everyone is happy about the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.coxwashington.com/reporters/content/reporters/stories/2006/06/18/BC_CHINA_APPRENTICE18_COX.html&quot;&gt;glorification of capitalism&lt;/a&gt;, of course, and one losing contestant may have &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pacificepoch.com/newsstories/71111_0_5_0_M/&quot;&gt;committed suicide&lt;/a&gt;, but overall &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/cndy/2006-12/14/content_758363.htm&quot;&gt;reaction&lt;/a&gt; in China to the show &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nextbillion.net/blogs/2006/08/02/tv-hit-proves-sustainability-will-win-in-china&quot;&gt;seems positive&lt;/a&gt;. Video clips &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200703u/chinese-reality-tv&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; &lt;small&gt;(also a full length article by the Atlantic if you have a paid subscription)&lt;/small&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.59300</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 08:32:21 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>capitalism</category>
		<category>china</category>
		<category>entrepreneur</category>
		<category>realitytv</category>
		<category>tv</category>
		<category>wininchina</category>
		<dc:creator>Burhanistan</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Neo-Maoism in China</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/56252/NeoMaoism%2Din%2DChina</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.monthlyreview.org/0606weil.htm&quot;&gt;Conditions of the Working Classes in China &lt;/a&gt;is an essay that presents a Marxist perspective on the changes taking place in China.  The author addresses the tensions between workers and employers, antagonisms between city workers and impoverished migrants from the countryside and the political fights between those who support the moves towards a market economy and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.monthlyreview.org/0105commentary.htm&quot;&gt;those convinced that Mao had it right all along.&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.56252</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Nov 2006 12:45:17 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Capitalism</category>
		<category>China</category>
		<category>Communism</category>
		<category>Instability</category>
		<category>Maoism</category>
		<category>MarketReforms</category>
		<category>PoliticalTensions</category>
		<category>Poverty</category>
		<dc:creator>jason&apos;s_planet</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>At least the Cold War made sense.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/54374/At%2Dleast%2Dthe%2DCold%2DWar%2Dmade%2Dsense</link>
		<description> Now we&apos;re faced with a supposedly &lt;a href=&quot;http://thescotsman.scotsman.com/index.cfm?id=299172004&quot;&gt;democratic&lt;/a&gt; Russia where the opposition parties are &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/08/29/AR2006082901604.html&quot;&gt;established, crushed, united, their leadership changed&lt;/a&gt;, all at the behest of the president. China, now clearly &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.commondreams.org/views06/0110-42.htm&quot;&gt;a capitalist state, albeit one without the democratic trimmings&lt;/a&gt;, still calls &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.china-embassy.org/eng/xw/t258711.htm&quot;&gt;itself communist&lt;/a&gt;. Vietnam has &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.voanews.com/english/archive/2005-04/2005-04-27-voa10.cfm&quot;&gt; gone much the same way&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Some things remain the same, though. America&apos;s still &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/venezuela/story/0,,1860867,00.html&quot;&gt;meddling&lt;/a&gt; in Latin America, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/news/20000919/&quot;&gt;just like it did during the Cold War&lt;/a&gt;. The US Army is also fighting a guerilla resistance in Iraq, its leaders apparently ignorant of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.kentlaw.edu/perritt/courses/seminar/2005-spring-papers/chris-s-consolidated.htm&quot;&gt; the lessons of history&lt;/a&gt;, yet accusing others of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2006/08/30/washington/30rumsfeld.html&quot;&gt;exactly that&lt;/a&gt;. It&apos;s just like the 60s, when it was just as obvious &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,,1858255,00.html&quot;&gt;who had learnt lessons and who hadn&apos;t&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.54374</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2006 02:00:04 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>America</category>
		<category>capitalism</category>
		<category>China</category>
		<category>coldwar</category>
		<category>coup</category>
		<category>democracy</category>
		<category>guerillawarfare</category>
		<category>Russia</category>
		<category>Vietnam</category>
		<dc:creator>imperium</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The Chinese are coming</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/43273/The%2DChinese%2Dare%2Dcoming</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.newstatesman.com/200507040007"&gt;China&apos;s non-interventionist approach to Africa.&lt;/a&gt; They recently lifted 200 million of their own people &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/shared/spl/hi/in_depth/china_modern/html/5.stm&quot;&gt;out of poverty&lt;/a&gt;. Unlike the G8, they aren&apos;t concerned about corruption, aid, debt relief, social impact, human rights, the environment, or &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/in_depth/middle_east/2002/conflict_with_iraq/default.stm&quot;&gt;spreading democratic ideology&lt;/a&gt;. They build governments, hotels and industrial plants in Sierra Leone, export 60% of oil from the &apos;genocidal&apos; &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/in_depth/africa/2004/sudan/default.stm&quot;&gt;Sudanese&lt;/a&gt;, sell weapons to both sides in war zones and deal arms to embargoed dictators like Mugabe. They&apos;ll be the third largest investor in Africa at the end of this year. The People&apos;s Republic of China: &lt;a href=&quot;http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/articleshow/1157982.cms&quot;&gt;threatening&lt;/a&gt; - or &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig3/guillory1.html&quot;&gt;Jeffersonian&lt;/a&gt;?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.43273</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2005 02:36:49 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>africa</category>
		<category>capitalism</category>
		<category>china</category>
		<category>democracy</category>
		<category>humanrights</category>
		<dc:creator>Bletch</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>China engraves capitalism onto its constitution</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/30374/China%2Dengraves%2Dcapitalism%2Donto%2Dits%2Dconstitution</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.iht.com/articles/122431.html"&gt;China engraves capitalism onto its constitution.&lt;/a&gt; This is good development indeed. Although business investment and production has been flourishing in China, doing business there remained very risky because of the fact that private property rights have never been officially legalized. That has changed. The question now is: does economic freedom beget political freedom?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.30374</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2003 20:22:25 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>capitalism</category>
		<category>china</category>
		<category>constitutions</category>
		<dc:creator>VeGiTo</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


