<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with catholicism and Catholic</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/catholicism+Catholic</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'catholicism' and 'Catholic' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 11:35:12 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 11:35:12 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Two popes, two</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/68673/Two%2Dpopes%2Dtwo</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.truecatholic.org/heresiesb16.htm&quot;&gt;&quot;Ratzinger is an Evolutionist, which by definition makes one an athiest&quot;&lt;/a&gt;, is one of the reasons that &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.truecatholic.org/&quot;&gt;this website&lt;/a&gt;, in which the &quot;true&quot; catholic faith (different [?] from the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.vatican.va/&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;other &lt;/em&gt; catholic faith&lt;/a&gt;) is promoted, gives as to claiming Benedict XVI isn&apos;t the true pope. And to make their point they have elected a &quot;real&quot; pope themselves: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.truecatholic.org/pope/&quot;&gt;Pope Pius XIII&lt;/a&gt; His real name? &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/True_Catholic_Church&quot;&gt;Lucian Pulvermacher&lt;/a&gt; (wikipedia)
(&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/5463/&quot;&gt;previously&lt;/a&gt;) But, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.truecatholic.org/pope/faq.htm#jp2&quot;&gt;How can they elect a pope when they have one in the Vatican?&lt;/a&gt; you ask? Well, according to the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.truecatholic.org/pope/faq.htm&quot;&gt;FAQ&lt;/a&gt;, which is a tad outdated: &quot;John Paul II is NOT the Pope and never was.  Neither were the 3 other imposters, John XXIII, Paul VI or John Paul I.&quot;

Of course, having two popes isn&apos;t news at all for the catholic church. There have been &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antipope&quot;&gt;antipopes &lt;/a&gt; (wikipedia), a second pope unrecognized by the Vatican, intermitently for almost 1900 years now.
Once there were even &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/13539a.htm&quot;&gt;three popes at the same time&lt;/a&gt;, couresy of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Western_Schism&quot;&gt;Western Schism&lt;/a&gt; (wikipedia).
(&lt;a href=&quot;http://j-walkblog.com/&quot;&gt;via&lt;/a&gt;) </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.68673</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 11:35:12 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>antipope</category>
		<category>atheist</category>
		<category>catholic</category>
		<category>catholicism</category>
		<category>evolutionist</category>
		<category>pope</category>
		<category>popes</category>
		<category>ratzinger</category>
		<category>religion</category>
		<category>schism</category>
		<category>vatican</category>
		<dc:creator>omegar</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Future Patron Saint of Abu Ghraib</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/65624/Future%2DPatron%2DSaint%2Dof%2DAbu%2DGhraib</link>
		<description> On October 28, the Pope will &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beatification&quot;&gt;beatify&lt;/a&gt; (certify as Blessed) several &lt;a href=&quot;http://newsaints.faithweb.com/martyrs/MSPC04.htm&quot;&gt;martyrs of the Spanish Civil War&lt;/a&gt;, among them &lt;b&gt;Gabino Olaso Zabala&lt;/b&gt;. Only thing is, Zabala is known to have &lt;a href=&quot;http://ncrcafe.org/node/1373&quot;&gt;participated&lt;/a&gt; in the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.commonwealmagazine.org/blog/post/index/1336/Beatifying-a-torturer&quot;&gt;torture&lt;/a&gt; of a fellow priest. Disturbingly, some Catholics are &lt;a href=&quot;http://amywelborn.wordpress.com/2007/10/12/timely-questions/#comments&quot;&gt;rallying behind&lt;/a&gt; a man who never publicly regretted his abusive past.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.65624</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 06:21:55 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>catholic</category>
		<category>catholicism</category>
		<category>civil</category>
		<category>philippines</category>
		<category>priest</category>
		<category>spanish</category>
		<category>torture</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<dc:creator>micketymoc</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Jesus Christ!</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/61115/Jesus%2DChrist</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/18618066/site/newsweek/print/0/displaymode/1098/"&gt;Jesus of Nazareth&lt;/a&gt; - a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/18629187/site/newsweek/print/0/displaymode/1098/&quot;&gt;theological biography&lt;/a&gt; by &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/18629516/site/newsweek/print/0/displaymode/1098/&quot;&gt;Pope Benedict&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.61115</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2007 00:28:25 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>benedict</category>
		<category>biography</category>
		<category>catholic</category>
		<category>catholicism</category>
		<category>christianity</category>
		<category>church</category>
		<category>God</category>
		<category>Jesus</category>
		<category>pope</category>
		<category>popebenedictxvi</category>
		<category>ratzinger</category>
		<category>theology</category>
		<dc:creator>kyleg</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>it&apos;s been agreed that results of the debate are to be binding on all religious and nonreligious people.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/58080/its%2Dbeen%2Dagreed%2Dthat%2Dresults%2Dof%2Dthe%2Ddebate%2Dare%2Dto%2Dbe%2Dbinding%2Don%2Dall%2Dreligious%2Dand%2Dnonreligious%2Dpeople</link>
		<description> Sam Harris, an atheist, and Andrew Sullivan, a Catholic, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.beliefnet.com/story/209/story_20904_1.html&quot;&gt;debate whether moderate religion makes any sense&lt;/a&gt;.  Harris: &quot;Religious moderation is the result of not taking scripture all that seriously.&quot;  Sullivan: &quot;Blogger, please.&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.58080</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 22:19:44 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>andrewsullivan</category>
		<category>atheism</category>
		<category>bible</category>
		<category>catholic</category>
		<category>catholicism</category>
		<category>christianity</category>
		<category>religion</category>
		<category>samharris</category>
		<dc:creator>ibmcginty</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Dona eis requiem. Latin mass to return?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/55755/Dona%2Deis%2Drequiem%2DLatin%2Dmass%2Dto%2Dreturn</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://ncregister.com/site/article/376/"&gt;Pope Benedict XVI wants to bring back the latin mass.&lt;/a&gt; This could be the start of a return to the old Catholic traditionalism and the undoing of &lt;a href=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vatican_II&quot; &quot;&gt;Vatican II&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.55755</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2006 12:31:20 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>benedict</category>
		<category>catholic</category>
		<category>catholicism</category>
		<category>language</category>
		<category>latin</category>
		<category>mass</category>
		<category>pope</category>
		<category>vaticanii</category>
		<dc:creator>SansPoint</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Catholicism</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/42946/Catholicism</link>
		<description> Some MeFites have expressed an interest in learning more about the Catholic Church&apos;s positions on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/01046b.htm&quot;&gt;abortion,&lt;/a&gt; the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.catholicculture.org/docs/doc_view.cfm?recnum=877&quot;&gt;death penalty,&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.oncecatholic.org/reading.asp#anchor_f &quot;&gt;other issues&lt;/a&gt;.  I hope you will all find these links interesting and enlightening.  The &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.livingcatholicism.com/&quot;&gt;peo&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.americancatholic.org/UpdateYourFaith/default.asp&quot;&gt;ple&lt;/a&gt; and the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.catholic.com/default.asp&quot;&gt;Chu&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.geocities.com/Heartland/2964/ &quot;&gt;rch&lt;/a&gt;.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.religioustolerance.org/chr_capr.htm &quot;&gt;But&lt;/a&gt;, what about how &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pre-evangelism.com/learn/theology_articles/eschatology/churches/pergamos.htm&quot;&gt;other Christians&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.carm.org/catholic.htm&quot;&gt;see Catholics&lt;/a&gt;?   Can Catholics respond &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.catholic.com/library/Catholic_Inventions.asp&quot;&gt;to these&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.geocities.com/Heartland/2964/shea.html &quot;&gt;claims&lt;/a&gt;?  Of course, some claims have to be taken with a very large &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.chick.com/reading/tracts/0071/0071_01.asp&quot;&gt;chunk of salt&lt;/a&gt;.  Some Christians are even &lt;a href=&quot;http://affirmingcatholicism.org/&quot;&gt;changing their minds&lt;/a&gt;.  Though there is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ocf.org/OrthodoxPage/reading/ortho_cath.html&quot;&gt;no single kind&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://mb-soft.com/believe/text/libcatho.htm&quot;&gt;of Catholicism&lt;/a&gt;.  Finally, here is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.religioustolerance.org/rcc.htm &quot;&gt;a source&lt;/a&gt; for further research.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.42946</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2005 14:16:25 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>catholic</category>
		<category>catholicism</category>
		<category>christianity</category>
		<category>religion</category>
		<dc:creator>oddman</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Papal conclave</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/41023/Papal%2Dconclave</link>
		<description> The conclave of cardinals will soon start the process of choosing a new pope. Have you filled in &lt;a href=http://www.drewmarlowe.com/pictures/brackets.jpg&gt;your brackets&lt;/a&gt; yet?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.41023</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2005 11:14:48 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>cardinals</category>
		<category>Catholic</category>
		<category>Catholicism</category>
		<category>conclave</category>
		<category>humor</category>
		<category>Pope</category>
		<category>religion</category>
		<dc:creator>Davenhill</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Christianity and a piece of rubber.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/29856/Christianity%2Dand%2Da%2Dpiece%2Dof%2Drubber</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://nytimes.com/2003/11/26/opinion/26KRIS.html"&gt;The value of disobedience.&lt;/a&gt; &lt;small&gt;[note: nytimes]&lt;/small&gt; &quot;Ignoring the reactionary policies of the Vatican, some local priests and nuns quietly do what they can to save parishioners from AIDS.&quot; So: when and why do people choose to quietly disobey, rather than leave and promote change from outside their social institutions...or vice versa? Should dissenters just leave, or stay and fight? Anecdotes from Republicans and NRA members are especially welcome ;-)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.29856</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2003 17:52:40 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>AIDS</category>
		<category>Catholic</category>
		<category>Catholicism</category>
		<category>condoms</category>
		<category>health</category>
		<category>HIV</category>
		<category>NYTimes</category>
		<category>sex</category>
		<category>Vatican</category>
		<dc:creator>stonerose</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The Seven Capital Sins - Revised!</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/24242/The%2DSeven%2DCapital%2DSins%2DRevised</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2003/03/06/arts/06GLUT.html"&gt;Hey, It&apos;s Not Enough We Die Of Obesity&lt;/a&gt; without having to go to Hell too?  Some enlightened Frenchmen are bending the Pope&apos;s ear, trying to spring Gluttony from the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rushman.org/seven/&quot;&gt;Deadly Sins&lt;/a&gt; blacklist. Well, even clever old &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newadvent.org/summa/208404.htm&quot;&gt;Thomas Aquinas&lt;/a&gt; did his damnedest to narrow the seven buggers down. So: which sins would &lt;b&gt;you&lt;/b&gt; excuse today&apos;s poor sufferers from and which ones would you &lt;b&gt;insist&lt;/b&gt; on keeping, if any? [&lt;small&gt;Something tells me MetaFilter is ideally suited to put in a good word for &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.digsmagazine.com/laze/laze_InPraiseofSloth.htm&quot;&gt;Sloth&lt;/a&gt;. I wonder why? Speaking of which, NYT reg. is required but you can read about it &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.decanter.com/news/newsdefault.asp?newsstoryid=1025&amp;ListStart=11&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; instead.  Via &lt;b&gt;Arts and Letters Daily&lt;/b&gt;.&lt;/small&gt;]  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.24242</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2003 23:31:36 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Catholic</category>
		<category>Catholicism</category>
		<category>France</category>
		<category>gluttony</category>
		<category>NYTimes</category>
		<category>petition</category>
		<category>Pope</category>
		<category>religion</category>
		<category>SevenDeadlySins</category>
		<category>sins</category>
		<dc:creator>MiguelCardoso</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/20817/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.time.com/time/asia/magazine/article/0,13673,501021021-364433,00.html"&gt;Mother Teresa fingered&lt;/a&gt; This is actually a rather shocking story because the criteria for a miracle at Lourdes, for example, are very strict. That&apos;s why there are so few of them.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.20817</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Oct 2002 07:54:08 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>catholic</category>
		<category>catholicism</category>
		<category>lourdes</category>
		<category>miracles</category>
		<category>motherteresa</category>
		<category>saints</category>
		<dc:creator>alloneword</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/17807/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/08677a.htm"&gt;Know-Nothings, Bible Riots and the Catholic Church&lt;/a&gt; Take a break from priest abuse news with this detailed history of anti-Catholic bias in the United States. In 1834, an angry Boston mob &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fireandroses.com/fire_roses.html&quot;&gt;burned down a convent&lt;/a&gt; after Harriet Beecher Stowe&apos;s father preached that Catholic immigrants were a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.artsci.wustl.edu/~acsp/courses/hist366/beecher.html&quot;&gt;threat to democracy&lt;/a&gt;. In Philadelphia, the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.irish-society.org/Hedgemaster%20Archives/philadelphia.htm&quot;&gt;1844 Bible Riots&lt;/a&gt; lasted for days, destroying Irish-Catholic churches and neighborhoods. In 1855, Louisville &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.atheists.org/schoolhouse/street.html#know&quot;&gt;Know-Nothings&lt;/a&gt; went on a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ulib.iupui.edu/kade/springer/Ch3/figure_30.html&quot;&gt;&quot;Bloody Monday&quot;&lt;/a&gt; rampage that left dozens of Catholics dead. Even telegraph inventor &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.xxicentury.org/HCA/poisonpens.html&quot;&gt;Samuel Morse&lt;/a&gt; got into the act with a series of anonymous anti-Catholic letters. Fascinating stuff, but oops, break&apos;s over. We now return to our &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dallasnews.com/cgi-bin/2002/priests.cgi&quot;&gt;regularly scheduled program&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.17807</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2002 21:38:55 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>america</category>
		<category>anti-catholic</category>
		<category>catholic</category>
		<category>catholicism</category>
		<category>christianity</category>
		<category>history</category>
		<category>religion</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>ushistory</category>
		<dc:creator>mediareport</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/16628/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,51028,00.html"&gt;No zero tolerance for ass hunting priests !!&lt;/a&gt; &quot;...the group of cardinals and top bishops stopped short of developing a zero-tolerance plan to punish abusive priests&quot;

Attention all catholics !  Be sure to ask your priest if he has already used his one free, get out of jail for sexually assaulting an unsuspecting child card, before you send your kid to Sunday school.

It baffles me how they cannot have zero tolerance for this.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.16628</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2002 04:22:28 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>abuse</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>Catholic</category>
		<category>Catholicism</category>
		<category>child</category>
		<category>priests</category>
		<category>sex</category>
		<dc:creator>a3matrix</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/15721/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.townhall.com/columnists/anncoulter/"&gt;Why Would Celibacy Cause Pedophilia?&lt;/a&gt; I been puzzled by the folks who are blaming the celibacy rule in the Catholic church for the pedophilic priests. Maybe I&apos;m missing something, but the argument sounds counter intuitive to me.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.15721</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2002 22:52:28 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>AnnCoulter</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>Catholic</category>
		<category>Catholicism</category>
		<category>celibacy</category>
		<category>Coulter</category>
		<category>pedophilia</category>
		<category>priests</category>
		<dc:creator>nobody_knose</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/8348/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nationalreview.com/comment/comment-hoopes061501.shtml"&gt;Catholic Church offered solution to AIDS crisis?&lt;/a&gt; Though I certainly lean more left than right, I have The National Review in print an online for many years to get some balance in my media intake.  I must say, they have run numerous articles online of late that I felt were well-reasoned, fair and insighful.

This, however, is crap.

&quot;Many have tut-tutted the Church for opposing condoms even as an AIDS prevention tool. Some have even called the Church complicit in AIDS deaths. But, as it has turned out, &lt;i&gt;condoms aren&apos;t a very good AIDS-prevention tool after all.&lt;/i&gt; [emphasis mine] &quot;

So now condoms are not useful for preventing AIDS.  Did we miss something?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.8348</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2001 12:37:10 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>AIDS</category>
		<category>Catholic</category>
		<category>Catholicism</category>
		<category>condoms</category>
		<category>health</category>
		<category>HIV</category>
		<category>NationalReview</category>
		<category>NRO</category>
		<category>sex</category>
		<dc:creator>4midori</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/7473/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://abcnews.go.com/wire/World/ap20010504_1202.html"&gt;Pope John Paul II apologizes&lt;/a&gt; for the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/source/choniates1.html&quot;&gt;Sack of&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://ic.net/~erasmus/RAZ291.HTM&quot;&gt;Constantinople&lt;/a&gt; and other atrocities committed by the Crusaders against the Greek Orthodox as he goes on with his &lt;a href=&quot;http://athensnews.dolnet.gr/athweb/nathens.prnt_article?e=C&amp;f=12908&amp;t=01&amp;m=A04&amp;aa=1&quot;&gt;controversial&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://athensnews.dolnet.gr/athweb/nathens.prnt_article?e=C&amp;f=12908&amp;t=01&amp;m=A05&amp;aa=1&quot;&gt;trip to Greece&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://athensnews.dolnet.gr/athweb/nathens.prnt_article?e=C&amp;f=12908&amp;t=01&amp;m=A24&amp;aa=1&quot;&gt;retracing the steps of his namesake&lt;/a&gt;.
&lt;br&gt;&lt;font size=&quot;1&quot;&gt;[I am gonna miss the guy when and if he passes away.]&lt;/font&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.7473</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2001 00:11:47 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>apology</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>Catholic</category>
		<category>Catholicism</category>
		<category>Constantinople</category>
		<category>Crusades</category>
		<category>Greece</category>
		<category>history</category>
		<category>JohnPaulII</category>
		<category>Pope</category>
		<dc:creator>tamim</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/7038/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.tnr.com/042301/lizza042301.html"&gt;Bush&apos;s strategy: court the Catholics.&lt;/a&gt; Bush won as high a percentage of church-going Catholics as did Reagan in 1984, as Reagan was winning 25% more votes than did Bush.  There&apos;s a strong Catholic vote in many states Bush narrowly lost, suggesting that consolidating his Catholic edge could assure victory in 2004.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.7038</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2001 17:14:50 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>Catholic</category>
		<category>Catholicism</category>
		<category>Election2004</category>
		<category>GeorgeWBush</category>
		<category>NewRepublic</category>
		<category>USPolitics</category>
		<category>USPresident</category>
		<category>voting</category>
		<dc:creator>MattD</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/6458/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/nm/20010320/ts/vatican_abuse_dc_1.html"&gt;Priests and missionaries sexually abusing nuns.&lt;/a&gt; I&apos;m thinking it&apos;s long past time the Catholic church re-thought the whole &quot;celibacy&quot; thing.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.6458</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2001 08:52:51 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>abuse</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>Catholic</category>
		<category>Catholicism</category>
		<category>celibacy</category>
		<category>missionaries</category>
		<category>nuns</category>
		<category>priests</category>
		<category>sexualabuse</category>
		<dc:creator>dnash</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/5704/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.cnn.com/2001/TECH/internet/02/06/pope.internet.reut/index.html"&gt;Vatican might name Saint Isidore of Seville the patron saint of Internet users and computer programmers.&lt;/a&gt; The world keeps getting weirder, doesn&apos;t it?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.5704</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2001 09:25:21 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>Catholic</category>
		<category>Catholicism</category>
		<category>computers</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>PatronSaint</category>
		<category>programmers</category>
		<category>religion</category>
		<category>SaintIsidore</category>
		<category>saints</category>
		<category>Vatican</category>
		<dc:creator>christian</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/3133/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.msnbc.com/news/455604.asp"&gt;Our religion is better then yours, Naa, Naa!&lt;/a&gt;         &#8220;The truth of faith does not lessen the sincere respect which the Church has for the religions of the world, but at the same time, it rules out...a religious relativism which leads to the belief that &#8216;one religion is as good as another&#8217;,&#8221; it said.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.3133</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2000 22:35:29 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>Catholic</category>
		<category>Catholicism</category>
		<category>Pope</category>
		<category>religion</category>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


