<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with censorship and fcc</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/censorship+fcc</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'censorship' and 'fcc' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 17:28:20 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 17:28:20 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>FCC, I have a complaint!</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/68681/FCC%2DI%2Dhave%2Da%2Dcomplaint</link>
		<description> &lt;em&gt;The talk show host, Miss Oprah Winfrey is illegally invading my privacy to promote show ideas on the Oprah Winfrey Show. Further, each time I gather evidence of proof, she pays people with her talk show earnings money to bribe them to destroy evidence. &lt;/em&gt;Many more complaints to the FCC about selected tv shows &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cynical-c.com/?p=9582&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.68681</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 17:28:20 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>censorship</category>
		<category>complains</category>
		<category>desperatehousewives</category>
		<category>familyguy</category>
		<category>fcc</category>
		<category>fundies</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>pennteller</category>
		<category>simpsons</category>
		<category>tv</category>
		<dc:creator>oxford blue</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>FCC lets one go by.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/39199/FCC%2Dlets%2Done%2Dgo%2Dby</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.salon.com/ent/2005/01/27/ptc_fcc/index.html"&gt;FCC Denies PTC&apos;s complaints.&lt;/a&gt; (Salon article, get daypass or bugmenot) The &lt;a href=&quot;http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-256182A1.pdf&quot;&gt;FCC &lt;/a&gt; succinctly denied (pdf) the&lt;a href=http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/tv/aptv_story.asp?category=1401&amp;slug=FCC+Indecency&amp;dpfrom=4&quot; &quot;&gt; 36 count complaint&lt;/a&gt; from &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.parentstv.org/PTC/publications/release/2005/0124.asp&quot;&gt;dismayed&lt;/a&gt; Parents Television Council. We&apos;ve talked about previous decisions &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/36991&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/37569&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; - could this be a light at the end of the tunnel?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.39199</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2005 10:44:53 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>censorship</category>
		<category>FCC</category>
		<category>television</category>
		<dc:creator>beezy</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>PTC won&apos;t let the FCC be?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/37569/PTC%2Dwont%2Dlet%2Dthe%2DFCC%2Dbe</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.mediaweek.com/mediaweek/headlines/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1000731656"&gt;The mice that roar.&lt;/a&gt; &quot;According to a new FCC estimate obtained by Mediaweek, nearly all indecency complaints in 2003&#8212;99.8 percent&#8212;were filed by the Parents Television Council, an activist group.&quot;  We &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/36991&quot;&gt;already know&lt;/a&gt; what a few people can do to your television viewing... is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.disinfopedia.org/wiki.phtml?title=Brent_Bozell&quot;&gt;this man&lt;/a&gt; effectively in charge of the FCC&apos;s indecency monitoring?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.37569</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Dec 2004 07:54:02 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Censorship</category>
		<category>FCC</category>
		<category>Indecency</category>
		<category>Powell</category>
		<category>PTC</category>
		<dc:creator>XQUZYPHYR</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Chilling Private Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/36907/Chilling%2DPrivate%2DRyan</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://money.cnn.com/2004/11/11/news/fortune500/savingpvt_ryan/index.htm?cnn=yes"&gt;The Chilling Effect.&lt;/a&gt; Some ABC affiliates have opted not to broadcast a scheduled airing of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0120815/&quot;&gt;Saving Private Ryan&lt;/a&gt;, due to concerns over new FCC indecency regulations. They don&apos;t want to get fined. The FCC won&apos;t say in advance whether the film is indecent (&quot;that would be censorship&quot;). But don&apos;t worry, the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.parentstv.org/&quot;&gt;Parents Televsion Council&lt;/a&gt; says the &quot;context&quot; makes it OK. Which is fine, but who utlimately gets to judge the context?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.36907</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Nov 2004 11:46:32 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>censorship</category>
		<category>fcc</category>
		<category>indecency</category>
		<category>specialinterestgroups</category>
		<category>television</category>
		<dc:creator>jpoulos</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>More on Howard Stern</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/31995/More%2Don%2DHoward%2DStern</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.buzzflash.com/farrell/04/03/far04009.html"&gt;There is no room for a left-wing Rush Limbaugh on the radio.&lt;/a&gt; &quot;Do you think Karl Rove might have made a phone call to little General Powell, little Michael and said, &apos;Let&apos;s get this over with. Let&apos;s give him the fine and get this done with before Stern gets us all voted out of office,&apos;&quot; the National Enquirer&#8217;s Mike Walker asked Stern.

&quot;First of all, I know that for a fact,&quot; Stern answered. &quot;I can&apos;t even tell you how, just like you can&apos;t reveal your sources. I have two sources inside the FCC. They know exactly what is going on. They had a meeting two weeks ago, freaking out. I seem to be making enough noise that people are realizing we could hurt George W. Bush in the elections. So they are trying to figure out at what point do they fine me. So, you are absolutely right.&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.31995</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2004 10:46:42 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>censorship</category>
		<category>ClearChannel</category>
		<category>conservatives</category>
		<category>FCC</category>
		<category>HowardStern</category>
		<category>MichaelPowell</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>radio</category>
		<dc:creator>skallas</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Pink Floyd and Indecency</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/31758/Pink%2DFloyd%2Dand%2DIndecency</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.wncx.com/"&gt;Crap - now they FCC Thought Police are going after Pink Floyd. Is &lt;b&gt;nothing&lt;/b&gt; sacred?!&lt;/a&gt; WNCX, a local Cleveland &quot;Classic rock&quot; station (who just happens to be the same station that airs The Howard Stern Show in the area) is unable to play Pink Floyd&apos;s &quot;Money&quot; because of the use of the word &quot;bullshit&quot; within the song.  To be honest, until this was brought to my attention, I had completely overlooked that lyric in the song.  But thanks to the FCC War Against Indency, I&apos;m now fully aware of it!  What other cases of &apos;indecency&apos; would you have overlooked had the authorities not brought it to your attention?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.31758</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2004 07:01:43 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bullshit</category>
		<category>censorship</category>
		<category>cleveland</category>
		<category>fcc</category>
		<category>indecency</category>
		<category>money</category>
		<category>pinkfloyd</category>
		<category>radio</category>
		<category>wncx</category>
		<dc:creator>tgrundke</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The Howard Stern Show</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/31732/The%2DHoward%2DStern%2DShow</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.howardstern.com"&gt;The Howard Stern Show&lt;/a&gt; was Howard-free the first hour and a half this morning while they played soundbites &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.korn.bhlabs.com/downloads/&quot;&gt;and&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bobmarley.com/songs/songs.cgi?getup&quot;&gt;songs&lt;/a&gt; about their &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.signonsandiego.com/tvradio/040301_pt.html&quot;&gt;current&lt;/a&gt; battle with the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fcc.gov&quot;&gt;FCC&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.clearchannel.com&quot;&gt;CC&lt;/a&gt;, and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.georgewbush.com&quot;&gt;GWB&lt;/a&gt;.  Howard threatens a revolutionizing move to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.xmradio.com&quot;&gt;satellite&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.siriusradio.com&quot;&gt;radio&lt;/a&gt;.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.stopfcc.com&quot;&gt;Petitions&lt;/a&gt; circulate, &lt;a href=&quot;http://einsiders.com/features/columns/enoughisenough.php&quot;&gt;some&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://msnbc.msn.com/id/4489463/&quot;&gt;articles&lt;/a&gt; written but surprisingly minimal public outcry thus far.&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.31732</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2004 07:25:13 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>censorship</category>
		<category>fcc</category>
		<category>howardstern</category>
		<category>radio</category>
		<category>satelliteradio</category>
		<dc:creator>Miyagi</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>FCC trying to ban the word fuck</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/30724/FCC%2Dtrying%2Dto%2Dban%2Dthe%2Dword%2Dfuck</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.reuters.co.uk/newsPackageArticle.jhtml?type=topNews&amp;amp;storyID=438405&amp;amp;section=news"&gt;Your tax dollars at work.&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.globeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20040113.wubadwords13/BNStory/Front/&quot;&gt;The Republican congress&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&amp;cid=638&amp;e=1&amp;u=/nm/media_indecency_fcc_dc&quot;&gt;the FCC&lt;/a&gt;, who evidently have &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.iwantmedia.com/consolidation.html&quot;&gt;nothing&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.alternet.org/story.html?StoryID=12451&quot;&gt;better&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.clearchannelsucks.org/&quot;&gt;to&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.janda.org/b20/News%20articles/vastwastland.htm&quot;&gt;do&lt;/a&gt;, want to waste time banning the word &lt;a href=&quot;http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=fuck&amp;r=67&quot;&gt;fuck&lt;/a&gt; from all radio and broadcast television.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.30724</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2004 05:06:46 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>censorship</category>
		<category>fcc</category>
		<category>federalcommunicationscommission</category>
		<category>fuck</category>
		<dc:creator>johnnydark</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


