<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with censorship and freedomofspeech</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/censorship+freedomofspeech</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'censorship' and 'freedomofspeech' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 03:27:47 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 03:27:47 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>You can say what we want you to say</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/79052/You%2Dcan%2Dsay%2Dwhat%2Dwe%2Dwant%2Dyou%2Dto%2Dsay</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://allthegoodnameshadgone.blogspot.com/2009/02/kidnapping-of-philip-rizk.html"&gt;The kidnapping of Philip Rizk;&lt;/a&gt; later they tried to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/10/world/middleeast/10egypt.html?_r=2&amp;ref=middleeast&quot;&gt;get&lt;/a&gt; his father as well.  Philip has now been &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.freephiliprizk.org/&quot;&gt;freed&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br&gt; The detention of protesters highlights Middle East governments&apos; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/feb/10/egypt-humanrights&quot;&gt;ambivalent attitudes&lt;/a&gt; towards support for the Palestinians. &lt;br&gt; Here it is worth noting of course that Philip is not &lt;a href=&quot;http://a-mother-from-gaza.blogspot.com/2009/02/egypt-arrests-blogger-philip-rizk.html&quot;&gt;alone&lt;/a&gt; in his arrest. Another blogger  &lt;a href=&quot;http://advocacy.globalvoicesonline.org/2009/02/10/egyptian-second-blogger-arrested-in-less-than-a-week/&quot;&gt;Diaa Eddin Gad&lt;/a&gt; has also been arrested as have &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/29057523/&quot;&gt;several people&lt;/a&gt; attending a Muslim Brotherhood demonstration. A strong, collective message was sent last February when Egypt and Saudi Arabia introduced a &lt;a href=&quot;http://cpj.org/2009/02/satellite-tv-middle-east.php&quot;&gt;pan-Arab regulatory framework&lt;/a&gt; for satellite television stations. The document, titled &quot;Principles for Organizing Satellite Radio and TV Broadcasting in the Arab Region,&quot; clearly targets independent and privately owned stations that have been airing criticism of Arab governments. &lt;br&gt; This has helped trigger  a&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/25/magazine/25bloggers-t.html?partner=rss&quot;&gt; Revolution, Facebook-Style&lt;/a&gt;. &quot;In most countries in the Arab world Facebook is now one of the 10 most-visited Web sites, and in Egypt it ranks third, after Google and Yahoo. About one in nine Egyptians has Internet access, and around 9 percent of that group are on Facebook &#8212; a total of almost 800,000 members. An estimated 18,000 Egyptians are imprisoned under the law, which allows the police to arrest people without charges, allows the government to ban political organizations and makes it illegal for more than five people to gather without a license from the government&quot;. </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.79052</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 03:27:47 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>blogger</category>
		<category>censorship</category>
		<category>Egypt</category>
		<category>facebook</category>
		<category>freedomofspeech</category>
		<category>Gad</category>
		<category>humanrights</category>
		<category>Rizk</category>
		<dc:creator>adamvasco</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Stuck in a child&#8217;s playground</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/67077/Stuck%2Din%2Da%2Dchild%3Fs%2Dplayground</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://rconversation.blogs.com/rconversation/2007/12/is-web20-a-wash.html"&gt;Is Web2.0 a wash for free speech in China?&lt;/a&gt; &quot;Lately I&apos;ve given a few talks around town titled &apos;Will the Chinese Communist Party Survive the Internet?&apos;  My answer - for the short and medium term at least - is  &apos;yes.&apos;&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.67077</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 23:12:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>censorship</category>
		<category>China</category>
		<category>freedomofspeech</category>
		<category>Internet</category>
		<category>Web2.0</category>
		<dc:creator>Abiezer</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Seemed a Harmless Little F*ck...</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/63706/Seemed%2Da%2DHarmless%2DLittle%2DFck</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20070809-pearl-jam-censored-by-att-calls-for-a-neutral-net.html"&gt;Why Does AT&amp;T Hate Pearl Jam&#8217;s Freedom?&lt;/a&gt; Well, of course, &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/6939853.stm&quot;&gt;they&#8217;re all apologies now&lt;/a&gt;&#8230; But this latest corporate misadventure seems to touch on all the hot buttons: Media consolidation, &lt;a href=&quot;http://futureofmusic.org/rockthenet/index.cfm?CFID=16481705&amp;CFTOKEN=61242585&quot;&gt;net neutrality&lt;/a&gt; and the future of political speech in America. (Newsfilter)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.63706</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 10:28:38 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bush</category>
		<category>censorship</category>
		<category>corporatecorruption</category>
		<category>freedomofspeech</category>
		<category>music</category>
		<category>netneutrality</category>
		<category>pearljam</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>telecomindustry</category>
		<dc:creator>saulgoodman</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Malaysia, Politics, and Bloggers</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/60072/Malaysia%2DPolitics%2Dand%2DBloggers</link>
		<description> An Indonesian TV crew was invited to Malaysia for their Visit Malaysia Year 2007 campaign but encountered many problems. &lt;a href=&quot;http://maverickid.blogspot.com/2007/01/malaysia-tourism-board-disappointing.html&quot;&gt;They write up about it&lt;/a&gt; - and start a flurry of comments and controversy across the Malaysian government about blogging.  [more inside]  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.60072</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2007 15:31:19 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>blogging</category>
		<category>censorship</category>
		<category>controversy</category>
		<category>currentissues</category>
		<category>debate</category>
		<category>discussion</category>
		<category>ethics</category>
		<category>freedomofspeech</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>laws</category>
		<category>malaysia</category>
		<category>parliament</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>regulations</category>
		<category>rules</category>
		<dc:creator>divabat</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Manuscripts Don&apos;t Burn</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/56104/Manuscripts%2DDont%2DBurn</link>
		<description> Malaysian bookstore Silverfish Books recently &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.silverfishbooks.com/RestrictedBooks1.htm&quot;&gt;pubhlished a list of books restricted by the Malaysian Home Ministry&lt;/a&gt; (confiscated at the border by Customs) - a list that includes &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/9812320822/metafilter-20/ref=nosim/&quot;&gt;Chinese teapots&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0785378103/metafilter-20/ref=nosim/&quot;&gt;children&apos;s prayers&lt;/a&gt;, and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1412731755/metafilter-20/ref=nosim/&quot;&gt;Dora the Explorer&lt;/a&gt;. Banned books &amp;amp; magazines &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.domini.org/openbook/malay20030414.htm&quot;&gt;aren&apos;t&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.aliran.com/oldsite/monthly/2003/4j.html&quot;&gt;exactly&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://thebookaholic.blogspot.com/2005/05/banning-books.html&quot;&gt;news&lt;/a&gt; in Malaysia; indeed, possession of said books can lead to &lt;a href=&quot;http://freethebooks.blogspot.com/2006/11/possession-penalty.html&quot;&gt;severe penalties, even jail time&lt;/a&gt;.The Opposition &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dapmalaysia.org/english/bul/apr05/bul2679.htm&quot;&gt;has made a statement&lt;/a&gt; before, but that hasn&apos;t led anywhere. However, since Silverfish&apos;s list, Malaysian bloggers have had enough with the arbitrary and Kafka-esque bans and restrictions, and have come together to form &lt;a href=&quot;http://freethebooks.blogspot.com/&quot;&gt;Manuscripts Don&apos;t Burn&lt;/a&gt;, to protest and talk about banned books and the larger issue of freedom of speech in Malaysia.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.56104</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2006 02:32:01 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>banned</category>
		<category>bloggers</category>
		<category>books</category>
		<category>censorship</category>
		<category>currentissues</category>
		<category>debate</category>
		<category>discussion</category>
		<category>freedomofspeech</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>malaysia</category>
		<category>restrictions</category>
		<dc:creator>divabat</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Blogs under scrutiny in Malaysia</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/53550/Blogs%2Dunder%2Dscrutiny%2Din%2DMalaysia</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2006/8/2/nation/15022918&amp;amp;sec=nation&amp;amp;focus=1"&gt;PM of Malaysia: Those who spread untruths on the Net will be detained&lt;/a&gt; Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi, Prime Minister of Malaysia, warned all bloggers that &quot;if information in blogs, websites and online portals were incorrect, bordered on slander, caused disturbance or compelled the public to lose faith in the nation&#8217;s economic policies, their authors would be detained for investigation&quot;. The Malaysian government is even &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2006/7/27/nation/14961817&amp;sec=nation&quot;&gt;considering adjusting the Printing Presses and Publications Act&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printing_and_Presses_Act&quot;&gt;^&lt;/a&gt; to include blogs and online media.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
This comes hot on the heels of a government-ordered &lt;a href=&quot;http://cijmalaysia.org/display_story.asp?ID=394&quot;&gt;media blackout&lt;/a&gt; on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.article11.org/&quot;&gt;Article 11&lt;/a&gt;, a coalition of NGOs dedicated to upholding the principles of Article 11 of the Malaysian constitution, about freedom of religion, after &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wwrn.org/article.php?idd=22226&amp;sec=33&amp;cont=all&quot;&gt;several protests&lt;/a&gt; claiming Article 11 to be anti-Muslim and confusing it with the now-defunct &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.aliran.com/oldsite/monthly/2005a/6g.html&quot;&gt;Interfaith Comission Initiative&lt;/a&gt;, which aimed to be a body of people of different faiths raising awareness about diversity of religion and working together on religious issues.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Minister of Energy, Water, and Communications Dr Lim Keng Yaik said that they will &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sun2surf.com/article.cfm?id=14960&quot;&gt;not censor the Internet&lt;/a&gt; (as promised when the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.msc.com.my/&quot;&gt;Multimedia Super Corridor&lt;/a&gt; was launched), but after events such as prominent Malaysian political blogger &lt;a href=&quot;http://jeffooi.com&quot;&gt;Jeff Ooi&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.globalvoicesonline.org/2005/02/28/global-voices-blogger-jeff-ooi-questioned-in-malaysia-regarding-weblog-post/&quot;&gt;being investigated over a supposedly offensive comment&lt;/a&gt; on his blog entry about Islam in 2005, and alternative news source &lt;a href=&quot;http://malaysiakini.com&quot;&gt;MalaysiaKini&lt;/a&gt;&apos;s office &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-pacific/2676297.stm&quot;&gt;raided after carrying a letter critical of the ruling party&apos;s policies&lt;/a&gt; in 2003, no one is really quite sure.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.53550</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2006 14:46:21 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>blackout</category>
		<category>bloggers</category>
		<category>blogs</category>
		<category>censorship</category>
		<category>freedomofreligion</category>
		<category>freedomofspeech</category>
		<category>independent</category>
		<category>malaysia</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>threat</category>
		<dc:creator>divabat</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Roadmap for the Prosecution</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/35907/Roadmap%2Dfor%2Dthe%2DProsecution</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.lewrockwell.com/kwiatkowski/kwiatkowski94.html"&gt;Terrorising free speech.&lt;/a&gt; Al Lorentz is a reserve Non-Commissioned Officer currently serving in Iraq. His blazingly clear, succinct article on Iraq, titled &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig5/lorentz1.html&quot;&gt;&quot;Why we cannot win&quot;&lt;/a&gt;, has raged over the wires (also at MeFi) since it was published on LewRockwell.com. Now, the military chain of command is considering charging Al with violation of Article 134 for making a statement with the intent to promote disloyalty or disaffection toward the U.S. by any member of the Armed forces. The military is also considering charging Al with violation of 1344.10, the conduct of partisan political activity, and violation of Standards of Conduct for unauthorized use of Government assets to create and email stories.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.35907</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2004 05:29:50 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>AlLorentz</category>
		<category>censorship</category>
		<category>freedomofspeech</category>
		<category>iraqwar</category>
		<category>LewRockwell</category>
		<category>military</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>soldiers</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<dc:creator>acrobat</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>User may incur custodial sentence for use of non-court approved words.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/27617/User%2Dmay%2Dincur%2Dcustodial%2Dsentence%2Dfor%2Duse%2Dof%2Dnoncourt%2Dapproved%2Dwords</link>
		<description> In a new twist to a theme discussed &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/26434&quot;&gt;earlier on MeFi&lt;/a&gt;, on language censorship (but in an entirely different case) the UK might be the first country  to jail a man for using &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/manchester/3145081.stm&quot;&gt;a single court-prohibited word&lt;/a&gt; in public.
&lt;br&gt;As repellent as the defendant&apos;s behaviour was, can such a case of censorship and prohibition of freedom of speech ever be justified?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.27617</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2003 09:21:25 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>censorship</category>
		<category>FreedomOfSpeech</category>
		<category>jail</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>Paki</category>
		<category>UK</category>
		<dc:creator>Blue Stone</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


