<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with chaitin</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/chaitin</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'chaitin' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2006 03:32:13 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2006 03:32:13 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Meta Math</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/50874/Meta%2DMath</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/CDMTCS/chaitin/&quot;&gt;Gregory Chaitin&apos;s&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/math.HO/0404335&quot;&gt;Meta Math! The Quest For Omega&lt;/a&gt; 
&lt;br /&gt;&quot;Okay, what I was able to find, or construct, is a funny area of pure mathematics where things are true for no reason, they&apos;re true by accident... It&apos;s a place where God plays dice with mathematical truth. It consists of mathematical facts which are so delicately balanced between being true or false that we&apos;re never going to know, and so you might as well toss a coin.&quot; From &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/CDMTCS/chaitin/summer.html&quot;&gt;Paradoxes of Randomness&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&quot;In my opinion, Omega suggests that even though maths and physics are different, perhaps they are not as different as most people think. To put it bluntly, if the incompleteness phenomenon discovered by G&amp;#0246;del in 1931 is really serious &#8212; and I believe that Turing&apos;s work and my own work suggest that incompleteness is much more serious than people think &#8212; then perhaps mathematics should be pursued somewhat more in the spirit of experimental science rather than always demanding proofs for everything.&quot; From &lt;a href=&quot;http://plus.maths.org/issue37/features/omega&quot;&gt;Omega and why maths has no Theory Of Everythings&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
[&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/comments.mefi/6396&quot;&gt;previously&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/43130&quot;&gt;see&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/43828&quot;&gt;also&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://reddit.com/info/4aoh/comments&quot;&gt;via&lt;/a&gt;]  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.50874</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2006 03:32:13 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>batshitinsane</category>
		<category>chaitin</category>
		<category>math</category>
		<category>maths</category>
		<category>meta</category>
		<category>meta-mathematics</category>
		<category>omega</category>
		<category>random</category>
		<dc:creator>MetaMonkey</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


