<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with charity and charities</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/charity+charities</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'charity' and 'charities' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2004 18:44:35 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2004 18:44:35 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>You know. For kids.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/36350/You%2Dknow%2DFor%2Dkids</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.childsplaycharity.org/"&gt;Child&apos;s Play Returns:&lt;/a&gt; Last year,  Penny Arcade&apos;s Mike Krahulik and Jerry Holkins got sick of gamers being portrayed as violence-drenched dweebs and asked their readers to pitch in for a toy drive for Seattle&apos;s childrens&apos; hospital. They ended up raising over a quarter of a million dollars in toys and cash in the space of just a few weeks. This year, they&apos;ve added four more childrens&apos; hospitals to their list for their readers to support during the holiday season. 

Mike and Jerry originally did this as a way to rebut the perception of gamers, but it also shows the power of personal credibility with regards to Web sites -- the people who contributed didn&apos;t just do it to redeem the image of gamers, they did it because Mike and Jerry asked them to. This political season we&apos;ve seen how bloggers can add to the coffers of candidates by endorsing them to their readers, but I think this is an even stronger case of online personal credibility translating into action (a similar case, on a slightly smaller scale: Pamie Ribon of Pamie.com and her readers &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pamie.com/blog/bookdrive/&quot;&gt;contributing nearly 500 new books to San Diego County Libraries&lt;/a&gt;). Would that more of the &quot;big&quot; bloggers and popular sites did more of this sort of thing.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.36350</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2004 18:44:35 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>charities</category>
		<category>charity</category>
		<category>children</category>
		<category>childsplay</category>
		<category>giving</category>
		<dc:creator>jscalzi</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Gift Hub</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/32453/Gift%2DHub</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.gifthub.org/"&gt;Gift hub - Connecting Funders, Active Citizens, and Advisors.&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://giving.typepad.com/about.html&quot; title=&quot;My personal interest is in bringing together the two sides of my life - the humanistic and the financial - and helping others to do the same. I have been active in the charitable world as a past President of the Dallas Chapter of National Committee on Planned Giving, as former head of New York Life Charitable Giving Network, and as a volunteer for Dallas Social Venture Partners. I have spoken on donor centered philanthropy at the annual convention of the National Committee on Planned Giving (2002), and on possible futures of philanthropy on a panel at The Council on Foundation&apos;s annual convention (2003). Chaired a conference on Emerging Trends in Philanthropy for The Institute for International Research (2001). &quot;&gt;Phil Cubeta&lt;/a&gt;, who is known to many as the weblog world&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wealthbondage.com/&quot; title=&quot;A Satire of Wealth and Power in the Tradition of Roman Comedy - Stupid, Obscene and Cruel&quot;&gt;Happy Tutor&lt;/a&gt; (et al.), wants to stop just &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wealthbondage.com/2004/03/09.html&quot; title=&quot;Many of the ills of small foundations can be traced to the donor&apos;s and advisor&apos;s cluelessness about civics. By opening up the closed networks of elite philanthropy, a side benefit would be raising the general level of practice among newer givers. Snobbery and comfortable old boy/girl networks militate against that result, but ideals don&apos;t.&quot;&gt;talking about philanthropy&lt;/a&gt; and actually do something. Now this a Corporate Guy that I actually respect. He&apos;s recently decided to &apos;go from satire to sermon, from noting problems to working for solutions,&apos; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gifthub.org/&quot; title=&quot;How do we bring those who care about an open society together to protect what is ours, our political freedom, our human dignity, our environment and here and there vestiges of spirituality and (non-commercial) culture? I know many who are also feverish thinking about these things. Alone, we all count our cards and see we hold a losing hand. I count mine over and over, and so might you. But as a matter of public goods and collective action, together we hold the most votes, the most dollars, the most talent and the open-hearted concern with the welfare of others.&quot;&gt;brought together&lt;/a&gt; some other &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gifthub.org/phils_rolodex/index.html&quot; title=&quot;Heavy hitters of many stripes.&quot;&gt;smart and influential people&lt;/a&gt; to talk about &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wealthbondage.com/2004/03/09.html&quot; title=&quot;Because so many of us feel that we have been played for stupid, that we have been lied to, had our patriotism abused, and watched our rights curtailed by those who were sworn to protect them. We do not want lines drawn between red and blue states, or wedge issues driven among us. We want to come together around the better angels of America&apos;s great democratic traditions and to be once again a beacon to the world, not only for free flows of capital, and the off-shoring of jobs, burgeoning profit margins, and bullying military might, not only for brands and Hollywood hooha, but for political liberty. We want a voice; we want a life lived with ideals, in brotherhood with others, even if we disagree with them. We are what NGOwatch cynically dismisses as &apos;the unelected few&apos; who are messing up plutocracy, by asking that we the people be heard.&quot;&gt;philanthropy, activism, volunteerism, charity, social movements, civil society, and emerging democracy&lt;/a&gt;, and is one of the people organizing an &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wealthbondage.com/2004/03/30.html&quot;&gt;Open Space&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gifthub.org/attending_conference/index.html&quot;&gt;for Giving Conference &lt;/a&gt;in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gifthub.org/2004/04/conference_plac.html&quot;&gt;Chicago&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gifthub.org/faq/index.html&quot; title=&quot;Q: What is your purpose? A: To create an open space where advisors, givers, and activists for grassroots organizations can meet to discuss ways and means, as well as ends in view. &quot;&gt;Can a webby philanthropic bridge&lt;/a&gt; be built between the chaotic, emergent ferment in the wired world and the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tpi.org/promoting/education/tuesdaysattpi/tuesdays_at_tpi.htm&quot; title=&quot;How does philanthropy enable powerful visions to become practical strategies for leadership? How can philanthropy become a true moral leader in the affairs of the world in which we live? Why has philanthropy failed, too often, to take on needed leadership to move an issue forward? What are the real world implications of these questions for donors and trustees as well as foundation CEOs and professional staff? &quot;&gt;world of corporate wealth&lt;/a&gt;? I don&apos;t know, but I wish him luck.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.32453</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2004 23:01:16 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>activism</category>
		<category>charities</category>
		<category>charity</category>
		<category>democracy</category>
		<category>giving</category>
		<category>philanthropy</category>
		<category>society</category>
		<category>volunteerism</category>
		<dc:creator>stavrosthewonderchicken</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>&apos;Tis the season to donate!</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/30116/Tis%2Dthe%2Dseason%2Dto%2Ddonate</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.give.org/reports/index.asp"&gt;&apos;Tis the season to donate!&lt;/a&gt; How does your favorite charity stack up?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.30116</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2003 12:57:09 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>charities</category>
		<category>charity</category>
		<category>donations</category>
		<category>giving</category>
		<dc:creator>ZenMasterThis</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/11328/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.newyork.bbb.org/alerts/9_11_01_disaster_relief.html"&gt;GIVER BEWARE! If you&apos;re gonna give, don&apos;t get taken. &lt;/a&gt; The New York branch of the Better Business Bureau has some useful material on how to spot scams over legitimate charities. &lt;I&gt;&quot;As awful as it sounds, there may be those that seek to profit from this misery.&quot;&lt;/I&gt; Useful tips and information are also available at &lt;A HREF=&quot;http://www.give.org/news/Sept2001.asp&quot;&gt;Give.Org&lt;/A&gt;, the &lt;A HREF=&quot;http://www.ulrc.com.au/html/report.asp?CaseFile=ULRR0087&amp;Page=1&amp;View=Request&amp;Collection=Attack%20on%20America&quot;&gt;Urban Legends Resource Center&lt;/A&gt; and the &lt;A HREF=&quot;http://www1.ifccfbi.gov/strategy/pressroom.asp&quot;&gt;Internet Fraud Complaint Center&lt;/A&gt;. Maybe I&apos;m just too cynical, but even the legitimate charities sound like scams to me. Why are there so many &quot;disaster relief funds&quot; forming? Wouldn&apos;t it be easier if there was just one place to give? Why all these middlemen? 
 </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.11328</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2001 16:47:05 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>BBB</category>
		<category>BetterBusinessBureau</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>charities</category>
		<category>charity</category>
		<category>fraud</category>
		<category>giving</category>
		<category>philanthropy</category>
		<dc:creator>ZachsMind</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/11081/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.raceforthecure.com/"&gt;Race For the Cure&lt;/a&gt; In the midst of our mass grief and generosity are we forgetting the daily victims of this disease that also robs children of a parent?  Are normal charities being short changed?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.11081</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2001 20:21:32 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>9-11</category>
		<category>BreastCancer</category>
		<category>cancer</category>
		<category>charities</category>
		<category>charity</category>
		<dc:creator>sierray</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


