<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with children and families</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/children+families</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'children' and 'families' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 07:50:16 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 07:50:16 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>The Case Against Homework.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/80711/The%2DCase%2DAgainst%2DHomework</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.thecaseagainsthomework.com/index.php"&gt;The Case Against Homework.&lt;/a&gt; &lt;i&gt;Does assigning fifty math problems accomplish any more than assigning five? Is memorizing word lists the best way to increase vocabulary&#8212;especially when it takes away from reading time? And what is the real purpose behind those devilish dioramas?&lt;/i&gt;  Sara Bennett wants to &lt;a href=&quot;http://stophomework.com/&quot;&gt;stop homework&lt;/a&gt;. Here she &lt;a href=&quot;http://stophomework.com/interview.pdf&quot;&gt;explains why&lt;/a&gt; (pdf).  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.80711</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 07:50:16 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>children</category>
		<category>education</category>
		<category>families</category>
		<category>homework</category>
		<category>parents</category>
		<category>school</category>
		<dc:creator>lunit</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>&quot;this chattering-class version of Heat magazine&quot;</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/79974/this%2Dchatteringclass%2Dversion%2Dof%2DHeat%2Dmagazine</link>
		<description> The novlist Julie Myerson has written a book, The Lost Child, about her son&apos;s addiction to cannabis, the violent behaviour she says this caused and her tough love policy. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/books/4952671/Julie-Myerson-Telling-my-son-Jake-to-leave-makes-me-want-to-die.html&quot;&gt;Extract&lt;/a&gt;. Her son is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1160085/Mum-did-obscene-The-son-Julie-Myerson-kicked-smoking-pot-tells-story.html&quot;&gt;angry&lt;/a&gt; that she&apos;s published it, and says his parents over-reacted: &quot;I wasn&apos;t doing anything that most other teenagers do, but such was their naive terror of drugs they were acting like six-year-olds&quot;. It comes out through &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mumsnet.com/Talk/adult_fiction/713727-Julie-Myerson-why-am-I-not-surprised-that-a-book&quot;&gt;MumsNet&lt;/a&gt; that Julie Myerson was the anonymous author of a Guardian column, &quot;Living with Teenagers,&quot;  which described her children&apos;s behaviour candidly without their knowledge. &lt;a href=&quot;http://entertainment.timesonline.co.uk/tol/arts_and_entertainment/books/book_extracts/article3313443.ece&quot;&gt;Extract&lt;/a&gt;. Myerson first &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/mandrake/4962988/Julie-Myerson-and-the-extraordinary-case-of-the-copycat-column.html&quot;&gt;denied this&lt;/a&gt;. The Guardian discusses whether it was &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/lifeandstyle/2009/mar/10/family-julie-myerson&quot;&gt;right to publish the columns&lt;/a&gt;. Myerson is &lt;a href=&quot;http://entertainment.timesonline.co.uk/tol/arts_and_entertainment/books/article5864227.ece&quot;&gt;interviewed&lt;/a&gt; about whether she was right to publish The Lost Child. Her partner, and son&apos;s father, Jonathan Myerson supports her: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2009/mar/10/cannabis-drug-abuse&quot;&gt;This is an emergency&lt;/a&gt;. Her son says she&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1161332/Youre-addict-mum-Son-Julie-Myerson-says-shes-hooked-exploiting-children.html&quot;&gt;addicted to writing&lt;/a&gt;. The tag line &quot;this chattering-class version of Heat magazine&quot; is from &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/libby_purves/article5870776.ece&quot;&gt;Libby Purves&apos;s comments&lt;/a&gt;. Many commentators consider Myerson was wrong to publish: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/mar/07/julie-myerson-drugs-son&quot;&gt;Ian Jack in the Guardian&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/commentators/tim-lott-julie-has-betrayed-jake-for-her-own-ambition-1639668.html&quot;&gt;Tim Lott in the Independent&lt;/a&gt;, balanced by a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/books/reviews/the-lost-child-by-julie-myerson-1643545.html&quot;&gt;positive review&lt;/a&gt; also in the Independent. The Daily Mail has dug up some &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1160769/Myersons-war-And-time-SISTER-says-shes-bent-truth.html&quot;&gt;more dirt&lt;/a&gt; from Myerson&apos;s sister. And here&apos;s an article by Myerson from 2001 about &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.independent.co.uk/news/education/education-news/when-jacob-was-offered-a-place-i-cried-he-was-shocked-but-my-husband-wasnt-619588.html&quot;&gt;getting her son into the right school.&lt;/a&gt; </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.79974</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 00:55:33 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>addiction</category>
		<category>cannabis</category>
		<category>children</category>
		<category>dailymail</category>
		<category>drugs</category>
		<category>families</category>
		<category>guardian</category>
		<category>independent</category>
		<category>jakemyerson</category>
		<category>jonathanmyerson</category>
		<category>juliemyerson</category>
		<category>miserymemoirs</category>
		<category>myersons</category>
		<category>parenting</category>
		<category>privacy</category>
		<category>socialclass</category>
		<category>times</category>
		<category>writers</category>
		<category>writing</category>
		<dc:creator>paduasoy</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Thinking of the (obese, cavity-ridden, materialistic, insecure, grasping, nagging) Children... for fun and profit!</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/45211/Thinking%2Dof%2Dthe%2Dobese%2Dcavityridden%2Dmaterialistic%2Dinsecure%2Dgrasping%2Dnagging%2DChildren%2Dfor%2Dfun%2Dand%2Dprofit</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.commercialfreechildhood.org/factsheets/facts.htm"&gt;Won&apos;t somebody please think of the children?&lt;/a&gt; Oh, don&apos;t fool yourselves! Americans under the age of 12 now spend or influence the spending of $565 billion a year - up from $2.2 billion in 1968, and kid-spending has roughly doubled every ten years for the past three decades, tripling in the 1990s. Which means &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.iqpc.com/cgi-bin/templates/single.html?topic=445&quot;&gt;someone&lt;/a&gt; is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.packagedfacts.com/product/display.asp?ProductID=928713&quot;&gt;always&lt;/a&gt; thinking of the children. The &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.aap.org/aboutchildren/pdf/Affluenza.pdf&quot;&gt;American Association of Pediatrics&lt;/a&gt; (pdf) cites this bludgeoning of kidvertising as creating in children &quot;a fever for shopping and spending, swollen expectations about material needs, decreasing immunity to the assaults of advertisers, self-concepts defined by brands of clothing, and a rash of of debt by the time they leave college&quot;.  [more...]  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.45211</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2005 01:46:08 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>advertising</category>
		<category>children</category>
		<category>commercialism</category>
		<category>families</category>
		<category>kids</category>
		<category>marketing</category>
		<category>parents</category>
		<category>pediatrics</category>
		<category>viral</category>
		<dc:creator>taz</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>California bill to ease move aways by custodial parents pulled.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/35050/California%2Dbill%2Dto%2Dease%2Dmove%2Daways%2Dby%2Dcustodial%2Dparents%2Dpulled</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.dailynews.com/Stories/0,1413,200~20954~2341264,00.html"&gt;California bill to ease &quot;move aways&quot; by custodial parents pulled.&lt;/a&gt; Until a recent CA Supreme Court decision, it was easy for custodial parents to move themselves and their children far from their ex-spouse.  The Court reversed the old rule and held that the move could be blocked if the non-custodial parent could show that it would interfere with his/her relationship with the kids.  Legislation to reimpose the old permissive standard passed through the State Senate, but has now been pulled off the legislative calendar after an outcry by father&apos;s rights groups.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.35050</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2004 13:03:12 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>california</category>
		<category>children</category>
		<category>families</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>lawsuits</category>
		<category>legal</category>
		<category>parenting</category>
		<category>parents</category>
		<dc:creator>MattD</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Okay, so who volunteers to name their kid &quot;Mefi?&quot;</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/30419/Okay%2Dso%2Dwho%2Dvolunteers%2Dto%2Dname%2Dtheir%2Dkid%2DMefi</link>
		<description> A &lt;em&gt;real&lt;/em&gt; Gucci bag out of your reach?  Don&amp;#0180;t worry, just compensate by naming your kid Gucci!  Or Lexus, Evian, Enternity....  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ajc.com/living/content/living/1203/28babybrand.html&quot;&gt;more brand baby names here&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.30419</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2003 08:17:20 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>babynames</category>
		<category>children</category>
		<category>families</category>
		<category>gucci</category>
		<category>luxury</category>
		<category>names</category>
		<category>parenting</category>
		<dc:creator>jennak</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The Story About The Baby</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/23768/The%2DStory%2DAbout%2DThe%2DBaby</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.ironycentral.com/babymain.html"&gt;&quot;The Story About The Baby&quot; -&lt;/a&gt; this consistently funny and entertaining website is well suited to anyone who has ever thought about having kids, has kids or anyone else. An endearing yet fantastically cynical take on the first year of raising a child has just wrapped up and in its completion is a great antidote to the overbearing cutesy-wootsy baby web pages that proliferate the internet. With entry titles such as: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ironycentral.com/archives/babyvol/babyvol1.html&quot;&gt;The Unbearable Grossness of Being&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ironycentral.com/archives/babyvol/babyvol7.html&quot;&gt;Dawn of the Neglectomatic&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ironycentral.com/archives/babyvol/babyvol44.html&quot;&gt;The Use Of Skinnerian Conditioning To Mold My Child&apos;s Brain&lt;/a&gt;, well how could you go wrong?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.23768</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2003 10:46:07 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>children</category>
		<category>families</category>
		<category>parenting</category>
		<dc:creator>BrodieShadeTree</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/21549/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://phreeque.tripod.com/hensel_sisters.html"&gt;Abigail and Brittany Hensel&lt;/a&gt; are in the 6th grade and continue to defy the odds.  After the initial struggle with the personal pronoun (her? their?), one is left with both curiosity and sympathy.  The greater issue is how to assimilate the truly miraculous.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.21549</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2002 13:22:49 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>children</category>
		<category>families</category>
		<category>parenting</category>
		<category>siamesetwins</category>
		<category>twins</category>
		<dc:creator>kablam</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/18498/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.expressindia.com/fullstory.php?newsid=12791"&gt;White couple gets black twins, sue IVF clinic. &lt;/a&gt; Experts say a mistake could have occurred in one of three ways.The wrong sperm could have been used to fertilise the right egg, the right sperm could have been used to fertilise the wrong egg, or the embryo implanted in the woman may have been another couple&apos;s altogether. Although it is not clear whether another couple has laid claim to the children, legal experts say the judge will be expected to make a modern-day judgment of Solomon on who should be considered the babies&apos; legal parents. This is unploughed legal ground. Is there a fair way to sort this out?


 </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.18498</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jul 2002 09:10:13 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>children</category>
		<category>families</category>
		<category>health</category>
		<category>ivf</category>
		<category>mistakes</category>
		<category>parenting</category>
		<category>race</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<dc:creator>Mack Twain</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/17893/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nandotimes.com/nation/story/438122p-3507664c.html"&gt;Billy Jean&apos;s not my lover.&lt;/a&gt; Should non-fathers pay child support to someone else&apos;s children?  More states are saying &quot;no.&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.17893</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2002 07:47:17 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>children</category>
		<category>childsupport</category>
		<category>courts</category>
		<category>families</category>
		<category>fathers</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>legalsystem</category>
		<dc:creator>kablam</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/17097/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/uk/england/newsid_1984000/1984502.stm"&gt;Mother jailed for girls&apos; truancy&lt;/a&gt; A question for our British gang, is truancy such a problem in the UK now that this is really necessary?  When I went to school in England, lo those &lt;i&gt;mumblemumble&lt;/i&gt; years ago, I don&apos;t remember it being this bad.  For the rest of the world, do you think truancy in your country would justify locking up the primary caregiver or is this punishing the wrong person?  Can parents be held responsible for everything a child does?  And better said, should  they?  When should we grant children the priviledges and penalties of their own autonomous actions?   </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.17097</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2002 08:15:35 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>children</category>
		<category>education</category>
		<category>families</category>
		<category>greatbritain</category>
		<category>parenting</category>
		<category>school</category>
		<category>truancy</category>
		<category>uk</category>
		<dc:creator>dejah420</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/13735/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/national/AP-Attacks-Beamer-Baby.html"&gt;Widow of Sept. 11 Hero Gives Birth.&lt;/a&gt; &quot;Lisa Beamer, the widow of the man who cried, &apos;Let&apos;s roll!&apos; as passengers aboard one of the doomed Sept. 11 flights prepared to confront their hijackers, has given birth to a healthy girl.&quot;  How bittersweet; a part of him lives on, but I&apos;m sure there is sadness because the husband couldn&apos;t be there for the birth.
&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Also, the Beamers have started a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.beamerfoundation.org&quot;&gt;memorial foundation&lt;/a&gt; for children who lost parents in the 9/11 attacks.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.13735</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2002 09:14:53 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>9-11</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>children</category>
		<category>families</category>
		<category>foundations</category>
		<category>lisabeamer</category>
		<category>memorial</category>
		<category>toddbeamer</category>
		<category>tribute</category>
		<dc:creator>jennak</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/11752/</link>
		<description> I was just over at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/user.mefi/1&quot; target=&quot;NewWindow&quot; title=&quot;You know, the Big Cheese...&quot;&gt;Matt&apos;s&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://a.wholelottanothing.org/&quot; title=&quot;Excellent, as always... even with the occassional reference to Satan.&quot; target=&quot;NewWindow&quot;&gt;blog&lt;/a&gt;, and he &lt;a href=&quot;http://a.wholelottanothing.org/archived.blah/10/01/2001/#710&quot; target=&quot;NewWindow&quot;&gt;mentions&lt;/a&gt; that his favorite baby blog is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.evohr.org/&quot; title=&quot;Nice enough... but the interface doesn&apos;t really draw me in.&quot; Target=&quot;NewWindow&quot;&gt;evohr.org&lt;/a&gt;. Personally, mine is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.henrysdiary.com&quot; title=&quot;Great, witty content with a compelling interface... not to mention a very cute kid.&quot; target=&quot;NewWindow&quot;&gt;henrysdiary.com&lt;/a&gt;. What&apos;s yours? Or do you have problems with this sort of site... do you think it&apos;s exploitive or otherwise dangerous?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.11752</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2001 13:34:21 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>babies</category>
		<category>bloggers</category>
		<category>blogging</category>
		<category>children</category>
		<category>families</category>
		<category>parenting</category>
		<dc:creator>silusGROK</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/7148/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.boston.com/dailyglobe2/110/nation/Estate_freed_from_cost_of_failing_son_s_tuition+.shtml"&gt;The estate of a divorced father is freed from paying a failing son&apos;s tuition. &lt;/a&gt; Basically, the ruling establishes (at least in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts) that children have obligations to parents. OK, if you want your parents to pay for your college education, you should at least try to graduate.  But what are the other consequences of this ruling? What&apos;s the point at which a child&apos;s bad behavior releases a parent from their obligations as a parent? If your divorced dad is the &lt;a href=&quot;http://us.imdb.com/Title?0079239&quot;&gt;Great Santini&lt;/a&gt;, can he cut off your child support if you hit him back?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.7148</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2001 15:26:41 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>children</category>
		<category>divorce</category>
		<category>families</category>
		<category>family</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>massachusetts</category>
		<category>parents</category>
		<dc:creator>dchase</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/7118/</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://fyi.cnn.com/2001/fyi/teachers.ednews/04/19/daycare.aggresssion.ap/index.html&quot;&gt;More hours in daycare makes bad kids&lt;/a&gt;. 

&quot;&apos;If more time in all sorts of (child care) arrangements is predicting disconcerting outcomes, then if you want to reduce the probability of those outcomes, you reduce the time in care,&apos; said Belsky. &apos;Extend parental leave and part-time work.&apos; One of the lead scientists on the study with Belsky, [Sarah Friedman of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Developmen] said, &apos;The easy solution is to cut the number of hours but that may have implications for the family that may not be beneficial for the development of the children in terms of economics.&apos;&quot; &lt;b&gt;Or, to say that in English&lt;/b&gt;, if you want your kids to be cared for at home you have to short them on food, clothing and shelter.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.7118</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2001 09:56:23 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>children</category>
		<category>daycare</category>
		<category>families</category>
		<category>parenting</category>
		<category>psychology</category>
		<dc:creator>jfuller</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/4743/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/metro/chicago/article/0,2669,ART-48653,FF.html"&gt;6 year-old boy in foster care because his mother insists on breastfeeding him.&lt;/a&gt; &quot;It&apos;s an offense to me that my child has been in foster care for over 120 days because [the state] decided it didn&apos;t believe in my parenting philosophy,&quot; said the unidentified mother.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.4743</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2000 06:20:38 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>breastfeeding</category>
		<category>children</category>
		<category>families</category>
		<category>parenting</category>
		<dc:creator>ethmar</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


