<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with children and family</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/children+family</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'children' and 'family' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 08:38:48 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 08:38:48 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Defining passion, as a mother</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/81968/Defining%2Dpassion%2Das%2Da%2Dmother</link>
		<description> &quot;Yes, I have four children. Four children with whom I spend a good part of every day: bathing them, combing their hair, sitting with them while they do their homework, holding them while they weep their tragic tears. But I&apos;m not in love with any of them. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2005/03/27/fashion/27love.html?_r=2&amp;pagewanted=1&quot;&gt;I am in love with my husband&lt;/a&gt;.&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.81968</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 08:38:48 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>ayeletwaldman</category>
		<category>children</category>
		<category>family</category>
		<category>kids</category>
		<category>love</category>
		<category>motherhood</category>
		<category>newyorktimes</category>
		<category>relationships</category>
		<category>sex</category>
		<category>spouse</category>
		<dc:creator>Brandon Blatcher</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Hope Generator</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/74935/Hope%2DGenerator</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.generationsofhope.org/&quot;&gt;Generations of Hope&lt;/a&gt; is a non-profit set up to bring kids out of foster care and into extended families with grandparents. The community of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/16/us/16rantoul.html?em&quot;&gt;Hope Meadows&lt;/a&gt; was repurposed from housing on a &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chanute_AFB&quot;&gt;closed Air Force base&lt;/a&gt; in Illinois. (The NYT article erroneously refers to the community by the non-profit&apos;s name. No matter. The story is still inspirational.) As an adoptive dad (about to become a biological dad for the first time) with parents in town for my kids to enjoy and vice versa (not to mention plenty of friends with parents on the other side of the country or the world who don&apos;t have it so good), I&apos;m thrilled to see &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wkkf.org/default.aspx?tabid=56&amp;CID=3&amp;ProjCID=271&amp;ProjID=129&amp;NID=29&amp;LanguageID=0&quot;&gt;organized support&lt;/a&gt;, however small, for this idea. Intergenerational childrearing has countless &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nncc.org/ComDev/dc34_intergeneration.html&quot;&gt;benefits for all involved&lt;/a&gt;, and I can only hope that the efforts to replicate the success of Hope Meadows are successful. </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.74935</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 12:53:36 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>adoption</category>
		<category>BRAC</category>
		<category>children</category>
		<category>family</category>
		<category>grandparents</category>
		<category>kids</category>
		<category>nonprofit</category>
		<dc:creator>yiftach</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>For The Bible Tells Me So</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/69724/For%2DThe%2DBible%2DTells%2DMe%2DSo</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-1927551763696121394&amp;amp;q=For+The+Bible+Tells+Me+So&amp;amp;total=290&amp;amp;start=0&amp;amp;num=10&amp;amp;so=0&amp;amp;type=search&amp;amp;plindex=2"&gt;For The Bible Tells Me So.&lt;/a&gt; (documentary, Google Video. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HpJAucyX7RE&quot;&gt;Trailer&lt;/a&gt;.)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.69724</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 17:42:13 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>children</category>
		<category>christianity</category>
		<category>family</category>
		<category>hate</category>
		<category>homophobia</category>
		<category>homosexuality</category>
		<category>love</category>
		<category>parents</category>
		<category>prejudice</category>
		<dc:creator>Ira.metafilter</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The Opt-Out Myth</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/59514/The%2DOptOut%2DMyth</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.cjr.org/issues/2007/2/Graff.asp"&gt;The &quot;Revolution&quot; that isn&apos;t.&lt;/a&gt; The idea that well-educated women are leaving their careers behind and choosing to stay at home is a recurring story- notably in &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.chss.montclair.edu/~landwebj/ww/optout.htm&quot;&gt;The Opt Out Revolution&lt;/a&gt;&quot;,  Lisa Belkin&apos;s 2003 essay in the New York Times.  A &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.uchastings.edu/site_files/WLL/OptOutPushedOut.pdf&quot;&gt;closer examination&lt;/a&gt; [.pdf, long] challenges the idea that women are returning home as a matter of biological &quot;pull&quot; rather than a workplace &quot;push&quot;, and argues that  how the media portrays the personal decisions of a few obfuscates the real social needs of most American working families.  In 2007, the United States is one of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.usatoday.com/news/health/2005-07-26-maternity-leave_x.htm&quot;&gt;few countries &lt;/a&gt;in the world without paid maternity leave.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.59514</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 16:18:51 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>career</category>
		<category>children</category>
		<category>family</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>optoutrevolution</category>
		<category>women</category>
		<category>workplace</category>
		<dc:creator>ambrosia</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>&quot;All families in OECD countries today are aware that childhood is being reshaped by forces whose mainspring is not necessarily the best interests of the child.&quot;</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/58674/All%2Dfamilies%2Din%2DOECD%2Dcountries%2Dtoday%2Dare%2Daware%2Dthat%2Dchildhood%2Dis%2Dbeing%2Dreshaped%2Dby%2Dforces%2Dwhose%2Dmainspring%2Dis%2Dnot%2Dnecessarily%2Dthe%2Dbest%2Dinterests%2Dof%2Dthe%2Dchild</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://society.guardian.co.uk/children/comment/0,,2013377,00.html"&gt;How does your country measure up as a place to raise kids?&lt;/a&gt; It turns out that &lt;i&gt;growing up in the UK is a bleaker experience than in any other wealthy country.&lt;/i&gt; UNICEF studied all the wealthiest nations (full &lt;a href=&quot;http://image.guardian.co.uk/sys-files/Society/documents/2007/02/14/UNchildwellbeing.pdf&quot;&gt;report PDF here&lt;/a&gt;), and the US and UK came in at the bottom on almost all indicators (material wellbeing, health and safety, education, family and peer relationships, behaviours and risks, and the subjective feelings of kids and teens themselves ). Doing best for kids were the Netherlands, Sweden, Denmark and Finland. It turns out that GDP and material wealth alone does not ensure healthier or happier or more well-educated kids--the Czech Republic scored very well despite being one of the poorest nations surveyed.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.58674</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 19:48:43 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>children</category>
		<category>community</category>
		<category>family</category>
		<category>global</category>
		<category>health</category>
		<category>kids</category>
		<category>society</category>
		<category>teens</category>
		<category>UNICEF</category>
		<category>wellbeing</category>
		<dc:creator>amberglow</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>One Egg At A Time, Please, Just One Egg At A Time</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/41957/One%2DEgg%2DAt%2DA%2DTime%2DPlease%2DJust%2DOne%2DEgg%2DAt%2DA%2DTime</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.lrc.ky.gov/record/05rs/HB145.htm"&gt;One Egg At A Time, Please, Just One Egg At A Time!&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;Representative Lonnie Napier (R)&quot;&gt;Representative Lonnie Napier&lt;/a&gt; has a great idea! &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/search?num=100&amp;hl=en&amp;lr=lang_en&amp;safe=off&amp;oi=defmore&amp;q=define:IVF&quot;&gt;IVF&lt;/a&gt; requires eggs to be harvested from a woman, combined with a man&apos;s sperm outside of the woman&apos;s body, then putting several embryos back in hopes of getting one to implant and grow, resulting in a baby.  

Rep. Napier, being strongly pro-life and opposed to IVF, thinks the way to solve this is to fertilize &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lrc.ky.gov/record/05rs/HB145.htm&quot;&gt;only one egg at a time&lt;/a&gt;.  And to violate this new law would be a class D felony in Kentucky, punishable with 1-5 years in prison.
&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Via &lt;a href=&quot;http://zia.blogs.com/wastedbirthcontrol/2005/05/ivf_hanky_panky.html&quot;&gt;And I Wasted All That Birth Control...&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.41957</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2005 14:40:41 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>birthcontrol</category>
		<category>childbirth</category>
		<category>children</category>
		<category>conception</category>
		<category>family</category>
		<category>ivf</category>
		<category>parenting</category>
		<dc:creator>OhPuhLeez</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Womb For God</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/37352/Womb%2DFor%2DGod</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.jimbob.info/"&gt;Meet The Duggars!&lt;/a&gt; ?Michelle and Jim Bob have had 15 children in 16 years all with first names that start with the letter &#8220;J&#8221;.  Recently they had their own 1 hour reality TV show called: &lt;a href=&quot;http://forums.televisionwithoutpity.com/index.php?showtopic=3120234&quot;&gt;14 Children and Pregnant Again.&lt;/a&gt;  They belong to the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.quiverfull.com/index.php&quot;&gt;Full Quiver movement&lt;/a&gt; which states that you should receive as many children as God blesses you with.  The women dress  &lt;em&gt;Little House on the Prairie &lt;/em&gt;fashion and refer to themselves as &lt;a href=&quot;http://buriedtreasurebooks.com/PrairieMuffinManifesto.php&quot;&gt;Prairie Muffins.&lt;/a&gt;  The men get to dress normally.  This is what &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.stormfront.org/archive/t-126066The_Duggar_family.html&quot;&gt;the White Supremists&lt;/a&gt; think of them and this is what &lt;a href=&quot;http://forums.crosswalk.com/webx/Fun/Television/706/&quot;&gt;other Christians&lt;/a&gt; think of them.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.37352</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2004 15:22:42 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>children</category>
		<category>chrisitan</category>
		<category>christian</category>
		<category>duggars</category>
		<category>family</category>
		<category>fullquiver</category>
		<category>prairiemuffin</category>
		<category>whitesupremacist</category>
		<category>whitesupremist</category>
		<dc:creator>Secret Life of Gravy</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/19314/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.thescotsman.co.uk/international.cfm?id=918402002"&gt;Girls seek &quot;divorce&quot; of lesbian mother&lt;/a&gt;   The Scottish paper seems to take a fairly serious anti-gay stance, where as the report in the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.chron.com/cs/CDA/story.hts/front/1539580&quot;&gt;Houston Chronicle&lt;/a&gt; seems to be a little more factual and less hysterical.  But, in either case, do children have the right to demand that their parents &quot;stop being gay&quot;?   </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.19314</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Aug 2002 08:35:53 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>children</category>
		<category>family</category>
		<category>gayrights</category>
		<category>legal</category>
		<category>lesbians</category>
		<category>mothers</category>
		<category>parents</category>
		<category>texas</category>
		<dc:creator>dejah420</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/11478/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/health/newsid_1599000/1599831.stm"&gt;A couple from the UK&lt;/a&gt; have a beloved son who has leukemia, and who may need a marrow transplant to save his life. They are using in-vitro fertilization to select a fertilized egg which will be genetically similar enough to their son so that the resulting baby could be a marrow donor. Is it ethical to design a baby as a transplant donor, even to save the life of another child?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.11478</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2001 06:20:11 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>children</category>
		<category>family</category>
		<category>leukemia</category>
		<category>parenting</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<category>uk</category>
		<dc:creator>Steven Den Beste</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/7148/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.boston.com/dailyglobe2/110/nation/Estate_freed_from_cost_of_failing_son_s_tuition+.shtml"&gt;The estate of a divorced father is freed from paying a failing son&apos;s tuition. &lt;/a&gt; Basically, the ruling establishes (at least in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts) that children have obligations to parents. OK, if you want your parents to pay for your college education, you should at least try to graduate.  But what are the other consequences of this ruling? What&apos;s the point at which a child&apos;s bad behavior releases a parent from their obligations as a parent? If your divorced dad is the &lt;a href=&quot;http://us.imdb.com/Title?0079239&quot;&gt;Great Santini&lt;/a&gt;, can he cut off your child support if you hit him back?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.7148</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2001 15:26:41 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>children</category>
		<category>divorce</category>
		<category>families</category>
		<category>family</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>massachusetts</category>
		<category>parents</category>
		<dc:creator>dchase</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


