<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with christian and Debate</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/christian+Debate</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'christian' and 'Debate' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 10:58:24 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 10:58:24 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Don&apos;t fuck with the crocoduck</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/61075/Dont%2Dfuck%2Dwith%2Dthe%2Dcrocoduck</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://i.abcnews.com/Nightline/story?id=3148940&amp;page=1&quot;&gt;Does God Exist? The Nightline Face-Off&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Former child star &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kirk_Cameron&quot;&gt;Kirk Cameron&lt;/a&gt; and his evangelist colleague &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wayofthemaster.com/&quot;&gt;Ray Comfort&lt;/a&gt; (infamous for their &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Of90cKxSeuw&quot;&gt;banana &lt;/a&gt; argument) take on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rationalresponders.com/&quot;&gt;atheists&lt;/a&gt; in a debate over the existence of God.  Per usual, you can expect calm, cool, collected temperaments and absolute respect for a difference of opinion.  Especially since both parties have been previously featured on Nightline, the former &lt;a href=&quot;http://abcnews.go.com/Nightline/story?id=1735434&amp;page=1&quot;&gt;taking to the streets to challenge atheists&lt;/a&gt; and the latter &lt;a href=&quot;http://abcnews.go.com/Nightline/story?id=2833103&amp;page=1&quot;&gt;proposing a God-rejecting blasphemy challenge&lt;/a&gt;.  You know you&apos;re rubbing your hands in anticipation of the fireworks, but you better let &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oQHCVaYNr9c&quot;&gt;Bill O&apos;Reilly&lt;/a&gt; weigh in first.  For more youtube goodness, parts &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WRmYA4LiALA&quot;&gt;1&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XKUwfVWFvDM&quot;&gt;2 &lt;/a&gt; of the Nightline piece (the full debate is available in the first link).  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.61075</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 10:58:24 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>atheism</category>
		<category>atheist</category>
		<category>bullfrog</category>
		<category>christian</category>
		<category>christianity</category>
		<category>crocoduck</category>
		<category>debate</category>
		<category>god</category>
		<category>kirkcameron</category>
		<category>nightline</category>
		<category>raycomfort</category>
		<category>sheepdog</category>
		<dc:creator>Mach3avelli</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>A Third Way for the Anglicans?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/52853/A%2DThird%2DWay%2Dfor%2Dthe%2DAnglicans</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.religioustolerance.org/chr_caan.htm"&gt;Is Catholic-Anglican Reconciliation the only way forward?&lt;/a&gt; The &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.anglicancommunion.org/&quot;&gt;Anglicans&lt;/a&gt; aren&apos;t &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/01498a.htm&quot;&gt;Protestant&lt;/a&gt;, they&apos;re &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.anglicancatholic.org/main/brochure/index.php?page=3&quot;&gt;Catholics&lt;/a&gt;!

In 1920 the Church of England - Anglicans - called for its reconciliation with the Catholic Church, and in 1925 the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bostontheological.org/academic/the_ecumenical_imperative.htm&quot;&gt;Catholic Ecumenical movement&lt;/a&gt; sought to make the Anglicans an autonomous Catholic church with the Archbishop of Canterbury as its patriarch. It would have been similar to the Coptic and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.catholic-hierarchy.org/diocese/dccsm.html&quot;&gt;Syro-Malabarese&lt;/a&gt; churches. The move was quashed by &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/pius_xi/index.htm&quot;&gt;Pope Pius XI&lt;/a&gt;, who ended the ecumenical movement there and then.

If conservative Anglicans chose this third way, instead of infighting over sexuality and gender issues or establishing a new model for membership, it could keep its married priests, its land, its churches, it&apos;s membership, and the Archbishop of Canterbury would still have a job.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.52853</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jul 2006 21:28:14 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Anglican</category>
		<category>Catholic</category>
		<category>Christian</category>
		<category>Debate</category>
		<category>Episcopal</category>
		<category>Pants</category>
		<dc:creator>parmanparman</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Spreading the Grace of God, 400 words a minute</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/50203/Spreading%2Dthe%2DGrace%2Dof%2DGod%2D400%2Dwords%2Da%2Dminute</link>
		<description> Team debate (or &apos;policy debate&apos;) &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/49011&quot;&gt;has been discussed here recently&lt;/a&gt;, and the various eschatological rudderings of the American evangelical Christian right wing are discussed here basically every day -- this week, the New York Times Magazine finds the nexus between the two. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2006/03/19/magazine/319debate.html?pagewanted=1&amp;_r=1&quot;&gt;Meet the Liberty University debate team&lt;/a&gt; [NYT link], a pet project of Jerry Falwell&apos;s, one of the top debate squads in the nation, coached by Brett O&apos;Donnell, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.timesdispatch.com/servlet/Satellite?pagename=LNA/MGArticle/LNA_BasicArticle&amp;c=MGArticle&amp;cid=1031780311687&quot;&gt;who also coached George W Bush&lt;/a&gt; in the 2004 Presidential debates.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.50203</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Mar 2006 19:50:27 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>christian</category>
		<category>debate</category>
		<category>falwell</category>
		<dc:creator>greggish</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>...resources that could prove pivotal to understanding and better contending the central struggles of our time are underutilized ...</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/47039/resources%2Dthat%2Dcould%2Dprove%2Dpivotal%2Dto%2Dunderstanding%2Dand%2Dbetter%2Dcontending%2Dthe%2Dcentral%2Dstruggles%2Dof%2Dour%2Dtime%2Dare%2Dunderutilized</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.talk2action.org/story/2005/11/22/115617/98"&gt;Talk To Action and Mother Jones mag team up for e-conference tomorrow:&lt;/a&gt; &lt;i&gt;...a day of thoughtful reflections on, and vigorous discussion of the role of religion and government -- as intended by the framers of the constitution, and the situation we face today. &lt;/i&gt; (MoJo&apos;s December issue is all about the role of religion and government, including this on Reconstructionists: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.motherjones.com/news/feature/2005/12/a_nation_under_god.html&quot;&gt;A Nation Under God.&lt;/a&gt;) New and old media officially collaborating to highlight specific issues and futher debate--a first?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.47039</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2005 08:03:02 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brainstorming</category>
		<category>Christian</category>
		<category>churchstate</category>
		<category>collaboration</category>
		<category>conference</category>
		<category>debate</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>religion</category>
		<dc:creator>amberglow</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


