<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with clothing and women</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/clothing+women</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'clothing' and 'women' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2006 08:38:50 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2006 08:38:50 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Intimate reading - corset books</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/48805/Intimate%2Dreading%2Dcorset%2Dbooks</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.fiberarts.com/back_issues/01_06/stone_gallery.asp"&gt;Corset books&lt;/a&gt; - recycle your underwear as art? To explore issues related to women&apos;s body image, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.artsci.wustl.edu/~artarch/womenartists/special_collections/stone/stone_1_desc.html &quot;&gt;Tamar Stone&lt;/a&gt; creates books from &quot;corrective&quot; women&apos;s undergarments. &lt;small&gt;(via &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.housewife.splinder.com/&quot;&gt;art for housewives&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/small&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.48805</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2006 08:38:50 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>art</category>
		<category>books</category>
		<category>clothing</category>
		<category>fiberarts</category>
		<category>underwear</category>
		<category>women</category>
		<dc:creator>madamjujujive</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>U.S. Army Female Attire</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/40946/US%2DArmy%2DFemale%2DAttire</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.army.mil/cmh/books/wac/appendix-d.htm"&gt;U.S. Army Uniforms for Females.&lt;/a&gt; While searching for late 50&apos;s and early 60&apos;s formal wear I came across this gem.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.40946</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Apr 2005 20:01:53 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>clothing</category>
		<category>military</category>
		<category>uniforms</category>
		<category>women</category>
		<dc:creator>snsranch</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/17944/</link>
		<description> &quot;For the last 8 years, young women at the Shah Makdhum factory in Bangladesh have been forced to work over 15 hours a day, 7 days a week, denied maternity benefits, beaten and paid just 15 cents for every $17.99 Disney shirts they sewed.&quot; 




&quot;Michael Eisner, CEO of Disney, pays himself $133 million a year, or about $63,000 and hour. It would take a worker in Bangladesh sewing Disney garments for 12 cents an hour 210 years to earn what Eisner does in an hour.&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.17944</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2002 06:54:16 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bangladesh</category>
		<category>clothing</category>
		<category>disney</category>
		<category>factories</category>
		<category>sweatshops</category>
		<category>women</category>
		<dc:creator>headlemur</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/13031/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.newyorker.com/THE_CRITICS/THE_ART_WORLD/"&gt;Women&apos;s Bodies or Women&apos;s Fashions: What Should Come First?&lt;/a&gt; &lt;b&gt;Comfort &lt;/b&gt; in Western dress is a relatively modern and liberal concept.  In the last few years, though, it seems to have been forgotten by increasingly unforgiving - even sadistic -  designers. Or is it just &lt;b&gt;Art&lt;/b&gt;?  Last Wednesday,  the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metmuseum.org/collections/department.asp?dep=8&quot;&gt;Costume Institute of the Metropolitan Museum of Art &lt;/a&gt; opened a new exhibition called &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metmuseum.org/special/se_event.asp?OccurrenceId={D5F42180-565E-11D5-93F7-00902786BF44}&quot;&gt;Extreme Beauty: The Body Transformed&lt;/a&gt;.  &lt;b&gt;Judith Thurman&lt;/b&gt;, in the current &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newyorker.com&quot;&gt;New Yorker&lt;/a&gt;, suggests things have gone too far. The &lt;b&gt;question&lt;/b&gt; is:  should leading designers be free to be absolutely creative - as they seem to be at the moment -  or should they adapt their creations to the actual shape of women&apos;s bodies? Has &quot;haute couture&quot; finally become an art in itself, with &lt;b&gt;no pretence &lt;/b&gt;of actually clothing real women? Is, in fact, a certain &lt;b&gt;hatred &lt;/b&gt; of women involved?
 </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.13031</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2001 16:35:39 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>clothing</category>
		<category>costumes</category>
		<category>fashion</category>
		<category>newyorker</category>
		<category>women</category>
		<dc:creator>MiguelCardoso</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


