<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with colinpowell and USA</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/colinpowell+USA</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'colinpowell' and 'USA' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 12:08:37 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 12:08:37 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Ret. Gen. Colin Powell endorses Senator Obama</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/75776/Ret%2DGen%2DColin%2DPowell%2Dendorses%2DSenator%2DObama</link>
		<description> Former US Secretary of State and retired General &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colin_Powell&quot;&gt;Colin Powell&lt;/a&gt;, a controversial, if &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/26098/Im-not-reading-this-This-is-bullshit&quot;&gt;reluctant&lt;/a&gt; supporter of the war on Iraq, offers his &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/27266223/page/2/print/1/displaymode/1098/&quot;&gt;endorsement&lt;/a&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21134540/vp/27265490#27265490&quot;&gt;Flash video&lt;/a&gt;) of Senator Barack Obama for the office of President of the United States. Excerpts from the transcript:

&lt;small&gt;``And I was also concerned at the selection of Governor Palin.  She&apos;s a very distinguished woman, and she&apos;s to be admired; but at the same time, now that we have had a chance to watch her for some seven weeks, I don&apos;t believe she&apos;s ready to be president of the United States, which is the job of the vice president.  And so that raised some question in my mind as to the judgment that Senator McCain made...

``I&apos;m also troubled by, not what Senator McCain says, but what members of the party say. And it is permitted to be said such things as, &quot;Well, you know that Mr. Obama is a Muslim.&quot; Well, the correct answer is, he is not a Muslim, he&apos;s a Christian.  He&apos;s always been a Christian.  But the really right answer is, what if he is?  Is there something wrong with being a Muslim in this country? The answer&apos;s no, that&apos;s not America.  Is there something wrong with some seven-year-old Muslim-American kid believing that he or she could be president?  Yet, I have heard senior members of my own party drop the suggestion, &quot;He&apos;s a Muslim and he might be associated terrorists.&quot; This is not the way we should be doing it in America...

``I have no truck for William Ayers.  I think what he did was despicable, and to continue to talk about it in 2001 is also despicable.  But to suggest that because Mr. Barack Obama had some contacts of a very casual nature &#8212;&amp;#0160;they sat on a educational board &#8212; over time is somehow connected to his thinking or his actions, I think, is a, a terrible stretch.  It&apos;s demagoguery...

``It isn&apos;t easy for me to disappoint Senator McCain in the way that I have this morning, and I regret that.  But I strongly believe that at this point in America&apos;s history, we need a president that will not just continue, even with a new face and with some changes and with some maverick aspects, who will not just continue, basically, the policies that we have been following in recent years.  I think we need a transformational figure.  I need &#8212; think we need a president who is a generational change.  And that&apos;s why I&apos;m supporting Barack Obama.  Not out of any lack of respect or admiration for Senator John McCain.&lt;/small&gt; </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.75776</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 12:08:37 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>colinpowell</category>
		<category>endorsement</category>
		<category>obama</category>
		<category>powell</category>
		<category>president</category>
		<category>republican</category>
		<category>us</category>
		<category>usa</category>
		<category>usian</category>
		<dc:creator>Blazecock Pileon</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>In policy reversal, US signals possible acceptance of theocracy in Iraq</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/33128/In%2Dpolicy%2Dreversal%2DUS%2Dsignals%2Dpossible%2Dacceptance%2Dof%2Dtheocracy%2Din%2DIraq</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.channelnewsasia.com/stories/afp_world/view/85209/1/.html"&gt;In policy reversal, US signals possible acceptance of theocracy in Iraq&lt;/a&gt; Bringing democracy to the area...Ladies: do we have some surprises in store for you. Is Iran to be the model? &quot;The United States signaled its readiness to put up with an Islamic theocracy in future sovereign Iraq, with Secretary of State Colin Powell saying the US administration &quot;will have to accept&quot; any government created as a result of free and fair elections there. ...&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.33128</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 May 2004 08:29:36 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>ColinPowell</category>
		<category>ForeignPolicy</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>iraqwar</category>
		<category>theocracy</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<dc:creator>Postroad</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Kashmir</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/32093/Kashmir</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.expressindia.com/print.php?newsid=29829"&gt;Has the US promised Kashmir to Pakistan?&lt;/a&gt; During his recent visit, Colin Powell named Pakistan a US ally.  This move has people in India concerned about what the US is willing to give Pakistan to fight Al-Qaeda.  [The site has pop-ups.  Sorry.]  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.32093</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2004 06:42:37 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>AlQaeda</category>
		<category>AmericanPolitics</category>
		<category>ColinPowell</category>
		<category>India</category>
		<category>Kashmir</category>
		<category>Pakistan</category>
		<category>proxies</category>
		<category>SouthAsia</category>
		<category>US</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<dc:creator>SandeepKrishnamurthy</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/5446/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.iht.com/articles/8389.html"&gt;Powell wants to scrap most US sanctions&lt;/a&gt; (IHT via &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.robotwisdom.com&quot;&gt;Robot Wisdom&lt;/a&gt;) Is this a good idea? We&apos;ve talked before on here about the damage sanctions can do. But is it a good idea to dismantle them in such a wholesale way? The primary motivation seems to be economic.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.5446</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2001 08:49:45 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>ColinPowell</category>
		<category>ForeignPolicy</category>
		<category>IHT</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>sanctions</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<dc:creator>Sean Meade</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


