<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with columbiajournalismreview</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/columbiajournalismreview</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'columbiajournalismreview' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 25 Apr 2004 19:27:19 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 Apr 2004 19:27:19 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Yankies And Southerners</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/32704/Yankies%2DAnd%2DSoutherners</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.cjr.org/issues/2004/2/levenson-dixie.asp"&gt;Not Just Whistling Dixie: Is The South, Like The Past, A Different Country?&lt;/a&gt; An article by &lt;b&gt;Jacob Levenson&lt;/b&gt; in the &lt;u&gt;Columbia Journalism Review&lt;/u&gt; retraces the  obligatory, almost stereotypical steps of the innocent, enlightened Yank lost and confused in the South.  Is it the usual &lt;i&gt;shtick&lt;/i&gt; or is there something genuinely befuddled and even &quot;foreign&quot; to it?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.32704</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Apr 2004 19:27:19 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>columbiajournalismreview</category>
		<category>society</category>
		<category>south</category>
		<category>southerners</category>
		<category>stereotypes</category>
		<category>thesouth</category>
		<category>yankees</category>
		<dc:creator>MiguelCardoso</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The Campaign Desk</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/31073/The%2DCampaign%2DDesk</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.campaigndesk.org/"&gt;The Campaign Desk&lt;/a&gt; If you are a political news junkie, try this: Critique and analysis of 2004 campaign coverage from Columbia Journalism Review

It is good. It is solid.It is intelligent.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.31073</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2004 12:55:07 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>2004</category>
		<category>campaign</category>
		<category>columbiajournalismreview</category>
		<category>newsfilter</category>
		<category>political</category>
		<dc:creator>Postroad</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


