<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with computers and security</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/computers+security</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'computers' and 'security' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 14:40:29 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 14:40:29 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>The dry, technical language of Microsoft&apos;s October update did not indicate anything particularly untoward.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/82489/The%2Ddry%2Dtechnical%2Dlanguage%2Dof%2DMicrosofts%2DOctober%2Dupdate%2Ddid%2Dnot%2Dindicate%2Danything%2Dparticularly%2Duntoward</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20227121.500-the-inside-story-of-the-conficker-worm.html"&gt;Its reach is impossible to measure precisely, but more than 3 million vulnerable machines may ultimately have been infected.&lt;/a&gt; : The inside story on the Conficker Worm at  New Scientist.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.82489</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 14:40:29 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>computers</category>
		<category>encryption</category>
		<category>ICANN</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>Kaspersky</category>
		<category>malicious</category>
		<category>Malware</category>
		<category>Microsoft</category>
		<category>Security</category>
		<category>spam</category>
		<category>TrendMicro</category>
		<category>Windows</category>
		<category>worm</category>
		<category>Zombiebotarmy</category>
		<dc:creator>The Whelk</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>IOKIYO</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/80652/IOKIYO</link>
		<description> &lt;em&gt;Beyond even the outrageously broad &quot;state secrets&quot; privilege invented by the Bush administration and now embraced fully by the Obama administration, the Obama DOJ has now invented a brand new claim of government immunity, one which literally asserts that the U.S. Government is free to intercept all of your communications (calls, emails and the like) and -- even if what they&apos;re doing is blatantly illegal and they know it&apos;s illegal -- you are barred from suing them unless they &quot;willfully disclose&quot; to the public what they have learned. &lt;/em&gt;- &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2009/04/06/obama/index.html&quot;&gt;Glenn Greenwald&lt;/a&gt;. In other news...

&lt;em&gt;The &lt;a href=&quot;http://cdt.org/security/CYBERSEC4.pdf&quot;&gt;Cybersecurity Act of 2009&lt;/a&gt; would, for example, give the President unfettered power to shut down Internet traffic in emergencies or disconnect any critical infrastructure system or network on national security grounds.&lt;/em&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://cdt.org/&quot;&gt;Center for Democracy and Technology&lt;/a&gt; </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.80652</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 12:18:20 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>computers</category>
		<category>doj</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>obama</category>
		<category>privilege</category>
		<category>secrets</category>
		<category>security</category>
		<dc:creator>Joe Beese</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>&quot;Leaving no trace [of our daily lives] is nearly impossible.&quot;</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/69129/Leaving%2Dno%2Dtrace%2Dof%2Dour%2Ddaily%2Dlives%2Dis%2Dnearly%2Dimpossible</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.popsci.com/scitech/article/2008-02/anonymity-experiment#&quot;&gt;The Anonymity Experiment&lt;/a&gt;. Is it possible to hide in plain sight? &lt;i&gt;Privacy-minded people have long warned of a world in which an individual&#8217;s every action leaves a trace, in which corporations and governments can peer at will into your life with a few keystrokes on a computer. Now one of the people in charge of information-gathering for the U.S. government says, essentially, that such a world has arrived.&lt;/i&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.69129</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 00:14:48 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>anonymity</category>
		<category>bigbrother</category>
		<category>computers</category>
		<category>culture</category>
		<category>informationage</category>
		<category>privacy</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<category>security</category>
		<dc:creator>amyms</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Geek Squad Steals Porn?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/62716/Geek%2DSquad%2DSteals%2DPorn</link>
		<description> Using a computer set to auto-screencast, &lt;em&gt;The Consumerist&lt;/em&gt; catches a Geek Squad technician copying porn from a client&apos;s computer to a thumbdrive, and they&apos;ve got &lt;a href=&quot;http://consumerist.com/consumer/investigations/video-consumerist-catches-geek-squad-stealing-porn-from-customers-computer-271963.php&quot;&gt;video&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://consumerist.com/assets/resources/geeksquadlogs.csv&quot;&gt;logfiles (CSV)&lt;/a&gt; to prove it. Also, the Geek Squad CEO &lt;a href=&quot;http://consumerist.com/consumer/investigations/why-were-not-telling-geek-squad-ceo-who-was-the-porn-stealing-agent-275398.php&quot;&gt;responds&lt;/a&gt;, and an anonymous Geek Squad tech &lt;a href=&quot;http://consumerist.com/consumer/the-rollercoaster-ride-of-pride%2C-shame%2C-and-morality/the-10-page-geek-squad-confession-+-stealing-customers-nudie-pics-was-an-easter-egg-hunt-257108.php&quot;&gt;confesses&lt;/a&gt; that this is not an uncommon practice: &quot;&lt;em&gt;stealing customers&apos; nudie pics was an easter egg hunt.&lt;/em&gt;&quot; Consumerist users suggest that &lt;a href=&quot;http://consumerist.com/consumer/geek-squad/were-always-looking-for-porn-on-customers-computers-techies-confirm-257309.php&quot;&gt;this practice might not be limited to Geek Squad&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;http://lifehacker.com/software/in-your-.puter%2C-stealin.-your-p0rn/-275854.php &quot;&gt;Via&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.62716</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 18:48:04 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>computers</category>
		<category>consumerist</category>
		<category>geeksquad</category>
		<category>porn</category>
		<category>privacy</category>
		<category>repair</category>
		<category>security</category>
		<dc:creator>charmston</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Herding Zombies</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/45713/Herding%2DZombies</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/articles/051010fa_fact"&gt;Interesting &quot;New Yorker&quot; article&lt;/a&gt; about online extortion via DDoS attacks. Call me naive and underinformed, but I had little understanding of how this works.
&lt;em&gt;&quot;In the most common scenario, the bots surreptitiously connect hundreds, or thousands, of zombies to a channel in a chat room. The process is called &#8220;herding,&#8221; and a herd of zombies is called a botnet.&quot;&lt;/em&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.45713</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2005 11:03:09 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>computers</category>
		<category>DDos</category>
		<category>extortion</category>
		<category>hackers</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>security</category>
		<dc:creator>dersins</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Happy PFD!...?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/30760/Happy%2DPFD</link>
		<description> Anyone in the mood for a celebration!?  &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.google.com/news?q=%22personal+firewall+day%22&amp;sa=N&quot;&gt;Today&lt;/a&gt; is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.personalfirewallday.org&quot;&gt;Personal Firewall Day&lt;/a&gt;!  Who&apos;s bringing drinks?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.30760</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2004 14:27:57 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>awareness</category>
		<category>computers</category>
		<category>firewall</category>
		<category>personal</category>
		<category>security</category>
		<dc:creator>bhayes82</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Nasty new IE hole</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/30123/Nasty%2Dnew%2DIE%2Dhole</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.zapthedingbat.com/security/ex01/vun1.htm"&gt;A new MS Internet Explorer vulnerability is discovered.&lt;/a&gt; Most digerati already know about the spammer and lamer trick to publish URLs that look like legitimate hostnames to fool people in to trusting a malicious site.  This trick is frequently used by spammers to steal people&apos;s PayPal accounts, by tricking them in to &quot;resetting&quot; their password at a site owned by the spammer but disguised as PayPal.com.

Today&apos;s new IE vulnerability is significantly worse. By including an 0x01 character after the @ symbol in the fake URL, IE can be tricked in to not displaying the rest of the URL at all. Don&apos;t expect a patch right way, the guy who found the hole &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/346948&quot;&gt;released it to BugTraq on the same day&lt;/a&gt; he notified Microsoft. &lt;small&gt; (via &lt;a href=&quot;http://simon.incutio.com/&quot;&gt;Simon Willison&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/small&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.30123</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2003 14:28:08 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>browsers</category>
		<category>computers</category>
		<category>IE</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>internetexplorer</category>
		<category>security</category>
		<category>software</category>
		<dc:creator>dejah420</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>What do you know about CALEA?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/27019/What%2Ddo%2Dyou%2Dknow%2Dabout%2DCALEA</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.pbs.org/cringely/pulpit/pulpit20030710.html"&gt;Bob Cringely thinks the government&apos;s information gathering capability is a disaster waiting to happen.&lt;/a&gt; Does our government have too much faith in computers as a solution to our problems?  Just as &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/21377&quot;&gt;electronic voting&lt;/a&gt; is looked at skeptically by the computer-savvy among us, so should the use of computers to gather information.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.27019</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2003 10:27:49 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>BobCringely</category>
		<category>computers</category>
		<category>Cringely</category>
		<category>eavesdropping</category>
		<category>espionage</category>
		<category>intelligence</category>
		<category>RobertCringely</category>
		<category>security</category>
		<category>technology</category>
		<dc:creator>TedW</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/20872/</link>
		<description> The US government recently released a draft of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.whitehouse.gov/pcipb/cyberstrategy-draft.html&quot;&gt;National Strategy to Secure Cyberspace&lt;/a&gt;, essentially it advocates ensuring security through consensus, with vendors, government agencies and consumers taking responsibility for the tools they use. That&apos;s not enough for Marcus Ranman who in the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tisc2002.com/&quot;&gt;TISC&lt;/a&gt; newsletter advocates passing legislation &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tisc2002.com/newsletters/414.html&quot;&gt;mandating consumers and ISPs&lt;/a&gt; to install firewalls and anti-viral software. At what point does an individuals (corporate or consumer) chosen level of computer security become a concern for the federal government?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.20872</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Oct 2002 06:20:11 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>computers</category>
		<category>Internet</category>
		<category>networks</category>
		<category>security</category>
		<dc:creator>cedar</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/18393/</link>
		<description> Using Internet Explorer, Outlook, or Outlook Express on a PC? &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pivx.com/larholm/adv/TL003/&quot;&gt;There&apos;s a new hack in town&lt;/a&gt;, ready to exploit cross site scripts like nobody&apos;s business. Do yourself a favor and disarm ActiveX on your settings.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.18393</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jul 2002 01:16:45 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>ActiveX</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>computers</category>
		<category>hack</category>
		<category>IE</category>
		<category>InternetExplorer</category>
		<category>Outlook</category>
		<category>OutlookExpress</category>
		<category>PC</category>
		<category>security</category>
		<dc:creator>mathowie</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/17822/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.internetnews.com/dev-news/article.php/10792_1365871"&gt;First JPEG virus discovered...&lt;/a&gt; &quot;The W32/Perrun virus, as it is now being called, extracts data from JPEG files and then injects picture files with infected digital images. A fair warning to those individuals who are fond of sending multimedia files to friends and families.&quot; Is everyone&apos;s porn stash threatened now?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.17822</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2002 10:08:56 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>computers</category>
		<category>first</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>JPEG</category>
		<category>multimedia</category>
		<category>security</category>
		<category>virus</category>
		<category>W32-Perrun</category>
		<dc:creator>darian</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/16894/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99992250"&gt;Competition to &quot;reverse engineer&quot; mystery program.&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt;Another cool thingy from the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.honeynet.org/&quot;&gt;HoneyNet Project&lt;/a&gt;; they&apos;re inviting people to convert a binary file into its original source. So, who&apos;s participating?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.16894</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2002 23:01:15 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>code</category>
		<category>competition</category>
		<category>computers</category>
		<category>crackers</category>
		<category>cracking</category>
		<category>hackers</category>
		<category>hacking</category>
		<category>HoneyNet</category>
		<category>NewScientists</category>
		<category>programmers</category>
		<category>programming</category>
		<category>ReverseEngineering</category>
		<category>security</category>
		<dc:creator>arnab</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/16708/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.salon.com/tech/feature/2002/04/26/hollings_spyware/index.html?x"&gt;Hollings privacy bill really a trojan horse for spyware and data miners?&lt;/a&gt; But Hollings&apos; bill should outrage Internet users just as much as Brilliant Digital&apos;s spyware. For while it talks a good game about protecting &quot;sensitive&quot; information, the truth is that it would place a congressional stamp of approval on precisely the kinds of practices that purveyors of spyware are eager to engage in. 
 </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.16708</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Apr 2002 16:21:32 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>computers</category>
		<category>dataminers</category>
		<category>Hollings</category>
		<category>legislation</category>
		<category>provacy</category>
		<category>Salon</category>
		<category>security</category>
		<category>spyware</category>
		<dc:creator>skallas</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/15810/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://online.securityfocus.com/news/338"&gt;Stick with WinAmp, not RealOne or WMP...&lt;/a&gt; Security vulnerability with &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.real.com&quot;&gt;RealOne&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.windowsmedia.com/mg/home.asp&quot;&gt;Windows Media Player&lt;/a&gt;, but not with &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.winamp.com/&quot;&gt;WinAmp&lt;/a&gt;.  Files with embedded URLs or JavaScript can be mislabeled as MP3 and RealOne and WMP will play them and the attachments.  WinAmp will just complain...  A demonstration can be found &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pc-radio.com/camouflage.html&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;...  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.15810</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2002 21:13:04 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>computers</category>
		<category>mp3</category>
		<category>music</category>
		<category>RealOne</category>
		<category>security</category>
		<category>WinAmp</category>
		<category>WindowsMediaPlayer</category>
		<category>WMP</category>
		<dc:creator>Samizdata</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/14270/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.trillian.cc/index.html"&gt;Trillian Users blocked from AIM service?&lt;/a&gt; The bit about this that scares me is the solution to the problem involves &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ceruleanstudios.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&amp;threadid=7624&quot;&gt;disabling the Secure IM functions&lt;/a&gt;.  Is this a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.geek.com/news/geeknews/2002jan/gee20020129009990.htm&quot;&gt;technical glitch &lt;/a&gt;or a conspiracy by AOL to reserve the ability to spy on our IM chats? Or build intentional &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.com.com/2100-1023-800754.html?legacy=cnet&quot;&gt;security loopholes&lt;/a&gt;?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.14270</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2002 09:42:14 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>AIM</category>
		<category>computers</category>
		<category>conspiracy</category>
		<category>instantmessaging</category>
		<category>security</category>
		<category>software</category>
		<category>Trillian</category>
		<dc:creator>Jeffy</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/13745/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://icliverpool.icnetwork.co.uk/0100news/0100regionalnews/page.cfm?objectid=11529559&amp;amp;method=full"&gt;&quot;Err...hello...is that Alex Braganza?  Sorry to disturb you ...&lt;/a&gt;  my name is Kenny Patterson.  No you don&apos;t know me.  But I took my computer into PC World for repair and when I got it back they&apos;d replaced my faulty hard disk with a reconditioned one which used to be your old machine.  Thing is, they hadn&apos;t actually bothered to format the thing so now I&apos;ve got all your personal details.  Yes that right -- that&apos;s were I got your phone number.&quot;  I imagine that&apos;s how the conversation would have started ...  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.13745</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2002 12:50:39 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>computers</category>
		<category>datawiping</category>
		<category>formatting</category>
		<category>harddrives</category>
		<category>reformatting</category>
		<category>security</category>
		<dc:creator>feelinglistless</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/13686/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://tlc.discovery.com/schedule/episode.jsp?episode=553260000"&gt;Hackers: Computer Outlaws&lt;/a&gt; A TLC show(that I&apos;m 3/4 through) that seems to actually use &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0141000511/metafilter-20/ref=nosim/&quot;&gt;reliable sources&lt;/a&gt; to discuss not just cracker behavior, but also the creative side of hackers, pointing out the developments attributed to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.woz.org/&quot;&gt;some hackers&lt;/a&gt;.

Now Markoff and Mitnick. Not a bad little show....
 </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.13686</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2002 22:53:51 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>computers</category>
		<category>crackers</category>
		<category>cracking</category>
		<category>documentary</category>
		<category>hackers</category>
		<category>hacking</category>
		<category>security</category>
		<category>television</category>
		<category>TLC</category>
		<category>TV</category>
		<dc:creator>dglynn</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/13033/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/nm/20011210/tc/attack_tech_dc_1.html"&gt;Antivirus Firms Say They Won&apos;t Create FBI Loophole.&lt;/a&gt; A free knuckle sandwich to the first person to say, &quot;looks like magic lantern has been extinguised!&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.13033</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2001 20:38:06 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>antivirus</category>
		<category>backdoor</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>computers</category>
		<category>FBI</category>
		<category>security</category>
		<dc:creator>mcsweetie</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/12725/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.wired.com/news/wireless/0,1382,46187,00.html"&gt;AirSnort.&lt;/a&gt; The dangerous app with the unlikely name allows users to snatch data being passed over wireless networks, eventually capturing passwords to the network.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.12725</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2001 09:27:24 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>AirSnort</category>
		<category>application</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>computers</category>
		<category>hackers</category>
		<category>networks</category>
		<category>security</category>
		<category>software</category>
		<category>Wired</category>
		<category>wireless</category>
		<dc:creator>o2b</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/12704/</link>
		<description> In lieu of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/comments.mefi/12590&quot;&gt;Magic Lantern&lt;/a&gt; thread, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.politechbot.com/p-02851.html&quot;&gt;Symantec will be ignoring the FBI trojan&lt;/a&gt;.  [taken from &lt;a href=&quot;http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/11/28/173201&amp;mode=nested&amp;threshold=1&quot;&gt;./&lt;/a&gt;]  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.12704</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2001 18:35:04 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>backdoor</category>
		<category>computers</category>
		<category>FBI</category>
		<category>Nortons</category>
		<category>security</category>
		<category>Symantec</category>
		<category>trojan</category>
		<dc:creator>hobbes</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/10518/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://slashdot.org/articles/01/09/18/151203.shtml"&gt;New worm doing the rounds.&lt;/a&gt; Great.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.10518</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2001 09:01:35 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>computers</category>
		<category>Microsoft</category>
		<category>Nimda</category>
		<category>security</category>
		<category>servers</category>
		<category>slashdot</category>
		<category>virus</category>
		<category>worm</category>
		<dc:creator>nico</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/9144/</link>
		<description> Seeing weird things in your website logs today? &lt;A HREF=&quot;http://www.cert.org/incident_notes/IN-2001-08.html&quot;&gt;This
will explain it...&lt;/A&gt; 

Running IIS and haven&apos;t patched it in over a month? &lt;A HREF=&quot;http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/technet/security/bulletin/MS01-033.asp&quot;&gt;Go
here.&lt;/A&gt;  13,000 servers have already been affected.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.9144</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2001 15:57:25 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>CodeRed</category>
		<category>computers</category>
		<category>IIS</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>Microsoft</category>
		<category>security</category>
		<category>servers</category>
		<category>worm</category>
		<dc:creator>machaus</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/9075/</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/4/20433.html&quot;&gt;Win XP&apos;s Product Activation as a breeze to hack.&lt;/a&gt;  Provided that RC1 still ships as is and you keep your RAM locked at a fixed number of sticks, it&apos;s simply a matter of keeping a backup of a DBL file.  For all the ballyhoo, it&apos;s amazing that something this obvious slipped under the cracks.  With WPA this sloppy, is this the only half-hearted facet of Windows XP?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.9075</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2001 12:04:28 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>activation</category>
		<category>computers</category>
		<category>hacked</category>
		<category>Microsoft</category>
		<category>security</category>
		<category>technology</category>
		<category>Windows</category>
		<category>XP</category>
		<dc:creator>ed</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/7222/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/sci/tech/newsid_1294000/1294473.stm"&gt;Those British boys at it again.&lt;/a&gt;   It was like this during the war, y&apos;know.  I remember my old mate Alan Turing beating the system in much the same way.  Saved the world he did.  Tally-ho.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.7222</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2001 15:19:29 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>antivirus</category>
		<category>computers</category>
		<category>email</category>
		<category>security</category>
		<category>UK</category>
		<category>virus</category>
		<dc:creator>feelinglistless</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/6295/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.arstechnica.com/wankerdesk/01q1/greathack-1.html"&gt;One million credit card numbers stolen! News at 11!&lt;/a&gt; The &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fbi.gov/pressrm/pressrel/pressrel01/nipc030801.htm&quot;&gt;FBI&lt;/a&gt; has gone public with a rather dry account of a huge organized attack on ecommerce sites, exploiting security flaws in NT which Microsoft fixed and offered patches for nearly two years ago.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.6295</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2001 10:20:11 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>business</category>
		<category>computers</category>
		<category>creditcards</category>
		<category>ecommerce</category>
		<category>FBI</category>
		<category>finance</category>
		<category>hackers</category>
		<category>hacking</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>Microsoft</category>
		<category>NT</category>
		<category>security</category>
		<category>theft</category>
		<category>Windows</category>
		<dc:creator>Steven Den Beste</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


