<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with congress and surveillance</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/congress+surveillance</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'congress' and 'surveillance' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2012 06:05:14 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2012 06:05:14 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>In the Public Interest....</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/117908/In%2Dthe%2DPublic%2DInterest</link>
		<description> Earlier this year, six scientists and doctors filed a lawsuit against the US Food and Drug Administration alleging that the FDA had &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/national/documents/fda-whistleblowers-set.html&quot;&gt;secretly monitored their personal e-mail accounts&lt;/a&gt; after they (legally) warned Congress that the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/fda-staffers-sue-agency-over-surveillance-of-personal-e-mail/2012/01/23/gIQAj34DbQ_story.html&quot;&gt;&quot;agency was approving medical devices that they believed posed unacceptable risks to patients.&quot;&lt;/a&gt; The agency said it had done so to &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/fda-says-it-monitored-e-mails-to-investigate-leak/2012/02/09/gIQARaIy2Q_story.html&quot;&gt;investigate allegations that the employees had leaked confidential information to the public.&lt;/a&gt;&quot;  At the time, the FDA indicated their computer monitoring was limited to five scientists. But now, the New York Times is reporting that &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/15/us/fda-surveillance-of-scientists-spread-to-outside-critics.html?pagewanted=all&quot;&gt;&quot;what began as a narrow investigation&quot; &quot;quickly grew in mid-2010 into a much broader campaign to counter outside critics of the agency&#8217;s medical review process.&quot;&lt;/a&gt;. NYT &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2012/07/15/us/15fda-document.html?ref=us&quot;&gt;Document Archive&lt;/a&gt; </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2012:site.117908</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2012 06:05:14 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>approval</category>
		<category>congress</category>
		<category>fda</category>
		<category>federal</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>medical</category>
		<category>medicine</category>
		<category>privacy</category>
		<category>surveillance</category>
		<category>technology</category>
		<category>us</category>
		<category>whistleblowers</category>
		<dc:creator>zarq</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Who said what now?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/78549/Who%2Dsaid%2Dwhat%2Dnow</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2009/01/obama-sides-wit.html"&gt;Wired: Obama Sides With Bush in Spy Case.&lt;/a&gt; &lt;em&gt;&quot;The Obama administration fell in line with the Bush administration Thursday when it urged a federal judge to set aside a ruling in a closely watched spy case weighing whether a U.S. president may bypass Congress and establish a program of eavesdropping on Americans without warrants.&quot;&lt;/em&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.78549</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 12:08:12 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bush</category>
		<category>CanYouHearMeNow</category>
		<category>change</category>
		<category>congress</category>
		<category>davidkravets</category>
		<category>FOIA</category>
		<category>kravets</category>
		<category>obama</category>
		<category>president</category>
		<category>ruling</category>
		<category>spies</category>
		<category>spy</category>
		<category>Surveillance</category>
		<category>warrant</category>
		<category>warrantless</category>
		<category>what</category>
		<category>wired</category>
		<category>wiretapping</category>
		<dc:creator>blue_beetle</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>On Policy Discussions in a Never-Ending War</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/47744/On%2DPolicy%2DDiscussions%2Din%2Da%2DNeverEnding%2DWar</link>
		<description> &quot;&lt;a href=http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10536559/site/newsweek/&gt;I learned this week&lt;/a&gt; that on December 6, Bush summoned Times publisher Arthur Sulzberger and executive editor Bill Keller to the Oval Office in a futile attempt to talk them out of running &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2005/12/16/politics/16program.html?hp&amp;ex=1134795600&amp;en=c7596fe0d4798785&amp;ei=5094&amp;partner=homepage&quot;&gt;the story&lt;/a&gt;...&quot; President Bush &lt;i&gt;really&lt;/i&gt; did not want journalists to reveal his NSA spying program against Americans [discussed &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/47642&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.]  And in yesterday&apos;s rare &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.iht.com/bin/print_ipub.php?file=/articles/2005/12/20/america/web.2012.conferencetext.php&quot;&gt;press conference&lt;/a&gt;, the President said: &quot;An open debate about law would say to the enemy, &apos;Here&apos;s what we&apos;re going to do.&apos; And this is an enemy which adjusts... Any public hearings on programs will say to the enemy, &apos;Here&apos;s what they do. Adjust.&apos; This is a war.&quot; Neocon guru William Kristol &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/12/19/AR2005121901027.html&quot;&gt;argues&lt;/a&gt; that talk of Bush being an &quot;imperial&quot; president&quot; is &quot;demagogic&quot; and &quot;irresponsible&quot; since &quot;Congress has the right and the ability to judge whether President Bush has in fact used his executive discretion soundly.&quot;  What is the role of &quot;open debate&quot; in a war against terror that may last for decades?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.47744</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2005 07:26:40 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>AlQaeda</category>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>civilliberties</category>
		<category>Congress</category>
		<category>democracy</category>
		<category>FISA</category>
		<category>GOP</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>Kristol</category>
		<category>NewYorkTimes</category>
		<category>NSA</category>
		<category>spying</category>
		<category>surveillance</category>
		<category>Times</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<dc:creator>digaman</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The register</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/10769/The%2Dregister</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/57/21836.html"&gt;The register&lt;/a&gt; chimes in on new anti-terrorist bills that attack due process, the fourth amendment, and encryption.  Sample letters and information on how to contact your reps are available at the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eff.org/alerts/20010921_eff_wiretap_alert.html&quot;&gt;Electronic Frontier Foundation.&lt;/a&gt; Act quickly, because congress sure will.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.10769</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2001 08:33:13 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>CivilLiberties</category>
		<category>Congress</category>
		<category>EFF</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>MATA</category>
		<category>surveillance</category>
		<category>terrorism</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>wiretapping</category>
		<dc:creator>skallas</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


