<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with consent</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/consent/rss</link>
	<description>tag posts with consent</description>
		  <pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 13:05:38 -0800</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 13:05:38 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Taking &quot;please,won&apos;t someone think of the children&quot; to a whole new level</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/73831/Taking-pleasewont-someone-think-of-the-children-to-a-whole-new-level</link>
		<description>
		&lt;a href=&quot;http://tribes.tribe.net/cuckoldpregnancy&quot;&gt;Cuckhold&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://tribes.tribe.net/cuckoldpregnancy/thread/94c836b0-6b26-4081-8c05-4050f4bd1c20&quot;&gt;Pregnancy&lt;/a&gt;: the ultimate expression of a lifestyle. Being deceived into raising another man&apos;s child would be a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/60673/Be-my-be-my-baby-Or-you-know-his&quot;&gt;nightmare for most men&lt;/a&gt;. For other&apos;s, it&apos;s the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/search?client=safari&amp;rls=en&amp;q=cuckold+pregnancy&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;oe=UTF-8&quot;&gt;ultimate hot fantasy&lt;/a&gt;. Taking it to the extreme of &lt;a href=&quot;http://punishedcuckoldhusbands.blogspot.com/2006/01/site-members-reply-to-poll.html&quot;&gt;having your wife bear another man&apos;s child&lt;/a&gt; is a suprising (to me) twist on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thestranger.com/seattle/SavageLove?oid=541805 - cuckold fantasy&quot;&gt;the&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cuckold#Cuckoldry_as_a_fetish - wiki&quot;&gt;Cuckhold&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://ask.metafilter.com/75642/Fantasy-turned-obsession&quot;&gt;fantasy&lt;/a&gt;. Interestingly, it seems to dovetail with &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.literotica.com/stories/showstory.php?id=319570&quot;&gt;another sexual fetish&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/59903/Mandingo-Party&quot;&gt;previously discussed&lt;/a&gt; on Metafilter. Oh yeah, NSFW !!!!  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.73831</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 13:05:38 -0800</pubDate>

<category>cuckhold</category>

<category>fetish</category>

<category>alternativelifestyle</category>

<category>whosyourdaddy</category>

<category>consent</category>

<dc:creator>echolalia67</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The Mind-Booty problem</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/65100/The-MindBooty-problem</link>
		<description>
		&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.slate.com/id/2174841/&quot;&gt;Having sex at 12 is a bad idea. But if you&apos;re pubescent, it might be, in part, your bad idea.&lt;/a&gt; Slate rethinks the age of consent.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.65100</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 16:08:51 -0800</pubDate>

<category>sex</category>

<category>sexuality</category>

<category>age</category>

<category>puberty</category>

<category>ageofconsent</category>

<category>consent</category>

<category>child</category>

<category>children</category>

<category>pedophile</category>

<category>paedophile</category>

<category>pedophilia</category>

<category>paedophilia</category>

<category>rape</category>

<category>minor</category>

<category>minors</category>

<category>menarche</category>

<category>purity</category>

<dc:creator>goodnewsfortheinsane</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Sexual Consent</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/56658/Sexual-Consent</link>
		<description>
		In the future there will be no sex without &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.glumbert.com/media/consent&quot;&gt;Sexual Consent.&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.56658</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 23:59:26 -0800</pubDate>

<category>sex</category>

<category>consent</category>

<dc:creator>Occams Hammer</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Coverage with Evidence Development</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/54510/Coverage-with-Evidence-Development</link>
		<description>
		&lt;a href="http://www.cms.hhs.gov/apps/media/press/release.asp?Counter=1423"&gt;Coverage with Evidence Development.&lt;/a&gt; Never heard of it?  Me neither, until today.  It&apos;s what they call this idea: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cms.hhs.gov/mcd/ncpc_view_document.asp?id=8&quot;&gt;if you want to be covered by Medicare, you&apos;re forced to participate in medical research.&lt;/a&gt;  The AMA &lt;a href=&quot;http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/extract/296/8/988&quot;&gt;approves&lt;/a&gt; (article abstract only).  So much for informed consent.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.54510</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2006 13:04:06 -0800</pubDate>

<category>medicine</category>

<category>medicare</category>

<category>healthcare</category>

<category>insurance</category>

<category>research</category>

<category>consent</category>

<category>doctors</category>

<category>dystopia</category>

<dc:creator>ikkyu2</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Men must seek consent</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/50815/Men-must-seek-consent</link>
		<description>
		&lt;a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/4803878.stm"&gt;An advertising campaign in the UK&lt;/a&gt; warns men that they &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/4780992.stm&quot;&gt;must seek a woman&apos;s consent before engaging in sex&lt;/a&gt;. The initiative is designed to combat the &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/4296433.stm&quot;&gt;low conviction rate for rape&lt;/a&gt; but will it criminalise a generation of young men?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.50815</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2006 06:33:57 -0800</pubDate>

<category>rape</category>

<category>consent</category>

<category>criminal</category>

<category>men</category>

<category>law</category>

<dc:creator>bobbyelliott</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Please dont let the cops in the house while Im at the store.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/50304/Please-dont-let-the-cops-in-the-house-while-Im-at-the-store</link>
		<description>
		&lt;a href="http://www.scotusblog.com/movabletype/archives/2006/03/court_limits_se.html "&gt;Yesterday the U.S. Supreme Court held&lt;/a&gt; in a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/05pdf/04-1067.pdf&quot;&gt;5-3 decision&lt;/a&gt; (.pdf) that police may not search a home if any inhabitant of the home is present and objects to the search, even if another inhabitant consents.  The Court drew what it acknowledged is a &#8220;fine line&#8221; &#8211; if a co-inhabitant is at the door and objects, the police can&#8217;t enter; but if the co-inhabitant is somewhere else &#8211; even in a nearby police car &#8211; and has no opportunity to object, then police don&#8217;t need his or her consent.  Chief Justice Roberts issued his first written dissent, blasting the majority&#8217;s &#8220;random&#8221; and &#8220;arbitrary&#8221; rule and suggesting that the ability of police to respond to domestic violence threats could be compromised.  The &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2006/03/23/politics/23scotus.html?ex=1300770000&amp;en=f76908d9d13520ca&amp;ei=5090&amp;partner=rssuserland&amp;emc=rss&quot;&gt;zingers in the footnotes &lt;/a&gt; may reveal &#8220;strains behind the surface placidity and collegiality of the young Roberts court.&#8221;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.50304</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2006 10:00:15 -0800</pubDate>

<category>georgia</category>

<category>randolph</category>

<category>search</category>

<category>seizure</category>

<category>consent</category>

<category>constitution</category>

<category>searchandseizure</category>

<category>4thamendment</category>

<category>fourthamendment</category>

<category>conlaw</category>

<category>law</category>

<category>courts</category>

<category>supremecourt</category>

<dc:creator>brain_drain</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Ignorance in the First Degree</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/31096/Ignorance-in-the-First-Degree</link>
		<description>
		In 2000, 18-year-old Matthew Limon was tried for having sex with a 14-year old.  Under Kansas state law, the consensual, though illegal, act merited a maximum 15-month sentence.  Except the 14-year old was also male.  Last week, the Kansas appeals court ruled that because of this, Limon posed a &quot;greater danger to the sexual mores of society,&quot; and ruled as such it was fair to &lt;a href=&quot;http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2004/01/30/national1326EST0579.DTL&amp;nl=fix&quot;&gt;sentence Limon to 17 years in prison&lt;/a&gt;.  State prosecutors applaud the decision as a victory against &quot;the potential attack on Kansas&apos; ban on gay marriage.&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.31096</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2004 10:26:44 -0800</pubDate>

<category>matthewlimon</category>

<category>limon</category>

<category>underagesex</category>

<category>consent</category>

<category>homosexuality</category>

<category>kansas</category>

<category>discrimination</category>

<category>gaymarriage</category>

<dc:creator>XQUZYPHYR</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Guilty Until Proven Innocent at Colby-Sawyer College</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/27322/Guilty-Until-Proven-Innocent-at-ColbySawyer-College</link>
		<description>
		&lt;a href="http://www.colby-sawyer.edu/assets/pdf/studenthandbook2003-2004.pdf"&gt;I hope you have your consent forms.&lt;/a&gt; According to page 23 of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.colby-sawyer.edu/assets/pdf/studenthandbook2003-2004.pdf&quot;&gt;The 2003-2004 Colby Sawyer Student Handbook&lt;/a&gt;, students accused of date rape are expected to provide &quot;evidence of unequivocal consent&quot; to defend themselves from the charge.  The handbook does not state what constitutes &quot;evidence of unequivocal consent&quot;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.27322</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2003 11:16:00 -0800</pubDate>

<category>brokenlinks</category>

<category>colby-sawyer</category>

<category>daterape</category>

<category>college</category>

<category>consent</category>

<category>rape</category>

<category>studenthandbook</category>

<dc:creator>DWRoelands</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>And you thought you only had to worry about pervy dentists</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/24235/And-you-thought-you-only-had-to-worry-about-pervy-dentists</link>
		<description>
		&lt;a href="http://www.salon.com/mwt/wire/2003/03/11/gyn/index.html"&gt;Gynecological exams are changing&lt;/a&gt; as new students begin to question old practices.  Medical students often perform &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.med.umich.edu/opm/newspage/2003/pelvicexam.htm&quot;&gt;pelvic exams&lt;/a&gt; when the patient is under anesthesia, not only without consent, but without informing them.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.24235</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2003 13:58:45 -0800</pubDate>

<category>gynecologogy</category>

<category>women</category>

<category>consent</category>

<category>medicine</category>

<dc:creator>Karmakaze</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>DNA and sampling</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/23411/DNA-and-sampling</link>
		<description>
		I just discovered the answer to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/22710#413909&quot;&gt;a question I asked here&lt;/a&gt;. Apparently, &lt;a href=&quot;http://canada.com/national/story.asp?id=D54E5718-B324-44E5-B235-D74B434E6F68&quot;&gt;the police can get a DNA sample from a suspect without the suspect&apos;s knowledge or consent&lt;/a&gt;. The police probably had a warrant, but the article doesn&apos;t say.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.23411</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2003 14:39:27 -0800</pubDate>

<category>DNA</category>

<category>Sample</category>

<category>Consent</category>

<category>Crime</category>

<category>Genetics</category>

<dc:creator>titboy</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


