<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with conservatives and Bush</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/conservatives+Bush</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'conservatives' and 'Bush' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2006 06:22:54 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2006 06:22:54 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Bush to promote gay marriage amendment.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/52029/Bush%2Dto%2Dpromote%2Dgay%2Dmarriage%2Damendment</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/06/01/bush.marriage.ap/index.html"&gt;Every two years, like clockwork, the extreme right need a boost.&lt;/a&gt; aka &quot;Best misleading headline ever.&quot; He&apos;s actually promoting his &lt;em&gt;anti-equal marriage amendment&lt;/em&gt;. This FOX News headline is more accurate: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,197882,00.html&quot;&gt;Marriage Amendment Could Soothe Angry Right&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.52029</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2006 06:22:54 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bush</category>
		<category>conservatives</category>
		<category>equalmarriage</category>
		<category>extremeright</category>
		<category>homophobia</category>
		<category>marriage</category>
		<dc:creator>andreaazure</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Getting Evangelicalism All Wrong</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/32368/Getting%2DEvangelicalism%2DAll%2DWrong</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.boston.com/news/politics/president/bush/articles/2004/04/04/apocalyptic_president/"&gt;How the left&apos;s fear of a right-wing Christian conspiracy gets George W. Bush -- and today&apos;s evangelical Christians -- all wrong.&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wheaton.edu/english/faculty/jacobs.htm&quot;&gt;Alan Jacobs&lt;/a&gt; (more from him &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theatlantic.com/issues/2000/10/wolfe-jacobs.htm&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bobdylan.com/etc/ajacobs.html&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;) suggests that the idea that President Bush&apos;s evangelical Christianity has an impact on his politics is really a misunderstanding of Bush, fundamentalists, and evangelicals.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.32368</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Apr 2004 09:48:24 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>AlanJacobs</category>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>Christian</category>
		<category>Conservatives</category>
		<category>election</category>
		<category>Evangelical</category>
		<category>Fundamentalist</category>
		<category>GeorgeBush</category>
		<category>GWB</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>Republicans</category>
		<category>RightWing</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<dc:creator>marcusb</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title> Conservatives dispute Bush on Islam</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/21969/Conservatives%2Ddispute%2DBush%2Don%2DIslam</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.msnbc.com/news/841426.asp?0cl=c3#BODY"&gt;Conservatives dispute Bush on Islam&lt;/a&gt; Bush critics, we are told, though they support him believe his statements about Islam are basically political and that Islam is not a peace-loving religion.  Though I am not sure on this issue, I do not think citing a passage or two in this or that holy scripture is sufficient to apply to any religion, since what it does (or has done) differs often from what it&apos;s stated position is. In this article I find myself torn between disliking in general anything that right-wing conservatives utter and also disliking anything that Bush has to say! My shortcoming, no doubt.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.21969</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Nov 2002 13:43:26 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>Christianity</category>
		<category>conservatives</category>
		<category>GeorgeBush</category>
		<category>Islam</category>
		<category>Muslims</category>
		<dc:creator>Postroad</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Condoms bad!  No sex, good!</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/21752/Condoms%2Dbad%2DNo%2Dsex%2Dgood</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.newsday.com/news/opinion/ny-vpcoc143002251nov14,0,7803300.column?coll=ny%2Dviewpoints%2Dheadlines"&gt;White House Wages Stealth War on Condoms&lt;/a&gt; The government is waging a covert war on condoms. Fact sheets on the effectiveness of condoms in preventing the transmission of the AIDS virus have disappeared from government sites.  Right wing activists have been appointed to the the presidential AIDS panel. Government audits of AIDS activist groups who protest these policies have begun.  So, apparently only evil-doers have sex outside of marriage, and they deserve to die horrible deaths.  

 </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.21752</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Nov 2002 10:14:55 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>AIDS</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>condoms</category>
		<category>conservatives</category>
		<category>GeorgeBush</category>
		<category>GWB</category>
		<category>health</category>
		<category>HIV</category>
		<category>right</category>
		<category>rightwing</category>
		<category>sex</category>
		<category>WhiteHouse</category>
		<dc:creator>dejah420</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/5011/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A4490-2000Dec31.html"&gt;John Ashcroft&lt;/a&gt; :Another one of Dubya&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A7146-2001Jan1.html&quot;&gt;&quot;compassionate conservatives&quot;&lt;/a&gt;? &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.salon.com/politics/wire/2000/12/27/ashcroft/index.html&quot;&gt;Confederate lover&lt;/a&gt;, or just a good &apos;ole &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A4704-2000Dec31.html&quot;&gt;racist&lt;/a&gt;?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.5011</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2001 23:32:34 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>ashcroft</category>
		<category>bush</category>
		<category>conservatives</category>
		<dc:creator>owillis</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


