<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with conservativism</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/conservativism</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'conservativism' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2004 18:39:12 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2004 18:39:12 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Women are &quot;evildoers&quot; too.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/36268/Women%2Dare%2Devildoers%2Dtoo</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&amp;amp;cid=519&amp;amp;ncid=519&amp;amp;e=23&amp;amp;u=/ap/20041014/ap_on_re_us/un_population_agenda"&gt;U.S. refuses to join U.N. plan for women&lt;/a&gt; From AP via Yahoo:  &lt;em&gt;UNITED NATIONS - The United States has refused to join 85 other heads of state and government in signing a statement that endorsed a 10-year-old U.N. plan to ensure every woman&apos;s right to education, health care, and choice about having children. &lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;

 and
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;em&gt;President Bush&apos;s administration withheld its signature because the statement included a reference to &quot;&lt;strong&gt;sexual rights&lt;/strong&gt;.&quot; &lt;/em&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.36268</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2004 18:39:12 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>conservativism</category>
		<category>GeorgeWBush</category>
		<category>GWBush</category>
		<category>SexualRights</category>
		<category>UN</category>
		<category>UnitedNations</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>USPresident</category>
		<category>WomensRights</category>
		<category>Yahoo</category>
		<dc:creator>Skygazer</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>All are equal before God. On Earth....</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/31466/All%2Dare%2Dequal%2Dbefore%2DGod%2DOn%2DEarth</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.365gay.com/newscon04/02/022004ecStudy.htm"&gt;Wages of hate - anti-gay attitudes damage the economy&lt;/a&gt; - conversely, Gay-tolerant societies &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.usatoday.com/news/opinion/editorials/2003-04-30-florida_x.htm&quot;&gt;prosper&lt;/a&gt;. Will GOP anti-elitism and the US religious right make the U.S. a 3rd world country? &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.vdare.com/roberts/all_columns.htm&quot;&gt;Paul Craig Roberts&lt;/a&gt; argues that we&apos;re on the fast track, and a Carnegie Mellon study (title link) shows that culturally repressive attitudes in America are driving away the &quot;Creative&quot; class. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2004/02/22/magazine/22ESSAY.html?pagewanted=print&amp;position=&quot;&gt;Virginia Postrel&lt;/a&gt; defines this class differently (manicurists and stone cutters) but in Richard Florida&apos;s &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/features/2004/0401.florida.html&quot;&gt;Creative Class War&lt;/a&gt;&quot; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/30741&quot;&gt;recently&lt;/a&gt; on Metafilter), &lt;i&gt;&quot;America is no long attracting creative workers from abroad because it is seen as &lt;a href=&quot;http://apnews.myway.com/article/20040225/D80TV1Q00.html&quot;&gt;an&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.matthewshepard.org/&quot;&gt;intolerant&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/22923&quot;&gt;society&lt;/a&gt;&quot;&lt;/i&gt;. More than artists and programmers are shunning the US -&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2004/02/26/education/26VISA.html?pagewanted=print&amp;position=&quot;&gt; scientists are staying away too&lt;/a&gt;. In the US, meanwhile, a bifurcation - Americans are &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn?pagename=article&amp;node=&amp;contentId=A8229-2003Mar21&amp;notFound=true&quot;&gt;geographically self-segregating&lt;/a&gt;, choosing to live with  those who hold similar beliefs and values.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.31466</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2004 12:47:48 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>365gay</category>
		<category>antigay</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>conservative</category>
		<category>conservativism</category>
		<category>creativeclass</category>
		<category>diversity</category>
		<category>gay</category>
		<category>homosexual</category>
		<category>homosexuality</category>
		<category>intolerance</category>
		<category>segregation</category>
		<category>tolerance</category>
		<dc:creator>troutfishing</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Eminem</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/21602/Eminem</link>
		<description> Did the election of Bush create an environment that would allow a violent misogynist like Eminem to become famous? Or, does &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.scaruffi.com/vol5/eminem.html&quot;&gt;Eminem&apos;s&lt;/a&gt; popularity reflect how easily we are blinded by nice wrapping? &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.alternet.org/story.html?StoryID=14533&quot;&gt;This article&lt;/a&gt; looks into what this kind of popularity could indicate to us about our present social conditions.
 </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.21602</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2002 15:10:17 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>axegrind</category>
		<category>bush</category>
		<category>conservativism</category>
		<category>eminem</category>
		<dc:creator>Raichle</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/16199/</link>
		<description> David Brock&apos;s book &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0812930991/metafilter-20/ref=nosim/&quot;&gt;Blinded by the Right&lt;/a&gt;&quot; chronicles the laundry list of illegality he took part in as a part of the conservative machine, smearing both Anita Hill and Bill Clinton during the 1990&apos;s. He claims &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cnn.com/2002/ALLPOLITICS/04/02/column.billpress/&quot;&gt;all the ridiculous things you&apos;ve heard about &quot;vast right-wing conspiracies&quot; were true&lt;/a&gt;, and that it&apos;s time the truth come out. Is this guy for real, or blowing smoke up our collective asses?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.16199</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2002 22:17:33 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Amazon</category>
		<category>AmericanSpectator</category>
		<category>AnitaHill</category>
		<category>BillClinton</category>
		<category>BlindedByTheRight</category>
		<category>conservativism</category>
		<category>Conspiracy</category>
		<category>DavidBrock</category>
		<category>operative</category>
		<category>USPolitics</category>
		<category>VastRightWingConspiracy</category>
		<dc:creator>mathowie</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/14033/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nationalreview.com/comment/comment-spalding012102.shtml"&gt;Happy MLK Day.&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.14033</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2002 08:57:15 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>conservative</category>
		<category>conservativism</category>
		<category>martinlutherking</category>
		<category>martinlutherkingjr</category>
		<category>mlk</category>
		<category>nationalreview</category>
		<category>oped</category>
		<dc:creator>Ty Webb</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/4819/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.dallasobserver.com/issues/2000-12-14/buzz.html"&gt;CueCats Held Hostage!&lt;/a&gt; A motley mix of left-wingers and computer geeks plans to march on the offices of the &lt;i&gt;Dallas Morning News&lt;/i&gt; this weekend, armed with pet carriers filled with CueCats, in order to protest what they see as pro-GOP slants in the paper&apos;s reporting. If the paper doesn&apos;t agree to their demands for more left-favorable reporting, the CueCats will be executed! Why CueCats? Because the company that owns the &lt;i&gt;News&lt;/i&gt; has been plugging CueCats like crazy. (second item on the page)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.4819</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2000 15:20:32 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Belo</category>
		<category>bias</category>
		<category>conservativism</category>
		<category>CueCats</category>
		<category>Dallas</category>
		<category>DallasMorningNews</category>
		<category>DallasObserver</category>
		<category>GOP</category>
		<category>journalism</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>protest</category>
		<category>Texas</category>
		<dc:creator>aaron</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


