<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with constitution and USConstitution</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/constitution+USConstitution</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'constitution' and 'USConstitution' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2004 06:07:44 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2004 06:07:44 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>CaliFilter</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/37047/CaliFilter</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://amendus.org/"&gt;AmendforArnold&amp;Jen&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt;Founded by a libertarian-turned RINO and a member of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://amendus.org/About.aspx?Section=1&quot;&gt;Green Party&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.37047</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2004 06:07:44 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Amendment</category>
		<category>ArnoldSchwarzenegger</category>
		<category>Article2</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>Constitution</category>
		<category>ConstitutionalAmendment</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>JenniferGranholm</category>
		<category>Politics</category>
		<category>Presidency</category>
		<category>USConstitution</category>
		<category>USPolitics</category>
		<category>USPresident</category>
		<dc:creator>magullo</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/21380/</link>
		<description> A New Constitutional Convention? Well, as we are all aware it&apos;s election days. Time to reshape our government as we see fit. And we have an remarkably robust &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lawguru.com/ilawlib/317.htm&quot;&gt;blueprint&lt;/a&gt; for our government, one that has stood the test of time. But is it time to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newusconstitution.org/&quot;&gt;change?&lt;/a&gt; What would your &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.usconstitution.net/consttop_newc.html&quot;&gt;suggestions&lt;/a&gt; be if you were present at a new creation? I know these links have a lefty feel, there what I could find. But I&apos;m interested in reasoned perspectives from left and right. Is this process necessary or desirable? What Would You Do?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.21380</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Nov 2002 08:35:55 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Constitution</category>
		<category>ConstitutionalConvention</category>
		<category>USConstitution</category>
		<category>USGovernment</category>
		<dc:creator>pjgulliver</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/14014/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2002/01/20020118-10.html"&gt;President Bush seems to think that abortion is unconstitutional.&lt;/a&gt; Does anyone smell hypocrisy here?  I would suggest that he examine the constitutionality of his own actions before throwing stones.   </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.14014</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2002 01:55:36 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>abortion</category>
		<category>bush</category>
		<category>constitution</category>
		<category>georgewbush</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>presidentbush</category>
		<category>usconstitution</category>
		<dc:creator>jack-o</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/1153/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A40691-2000Mar29.html"&gt;Yay!  The flag burning amendment is dead&lt;/a&gt; , at least for another year.  What offends me most is: why did 63 Senators vote for this?  Second most: do these people actually believe themselves when they preach that people have fought and died for the flag?  I *hope* that no soldiers have fought for the flag, per se; I would hope that our military fights for the ideals of which the flag is a nice, abstract representation.&lt;br&gt;I&apos;ve put up &lt;a href=&quot;http://q.queso.com/discuss/msgReader$328&quot;&gt;a short page with links&lt;/a&gt; to the official Congressional Record transcripts of the debate, for those who are interested.  (It gives me reading for my plane ride tomorrow, if I can avoid the calling of my Sims family.)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.1153</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2000 17:47:23 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>amendments</category>
		<category>Americanpolitics</category>
		<category>brokenlinks</category>
		<category>congress</category>
		<category>constitution</category>
		<category>deadlinks</category>
		<category>flagburning</category>
		<category>flags</category>
		<category>patriotism</category>
		<category>patriots</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>USconstitution</category>
		<category>USPolitics</category>
		<dc:creator>delfuego</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


