<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with constitution and fourthamendment</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/constitution+fourthamendment</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'constitution' and 'fourthamendment' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 10:04:56 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 10:04:56 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Curfew is declared in a 10 block area of a small Arkansas town</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/74091/Curfew%2Dis%2Ddeclared%2Din%2Da%2D10%2Dblock%2Darea%2Dof%2Da%2Dsmall%2DArkansas%2Dtown</link>
		<description> Curfew  is declared in a 10 block area of a &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helena,_Arkansas&quot;&gt;small Arkansas town&lt;/a&gt;. From the local newspaper:  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.helena-arkansas.com/news/x960030171/&quot;&gt;Community declares war on crime-Mayor issues curfew order&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.helena-arkansas.com/news/x1570384758/&quot;&gt;Ark. city neighborhood under 24-hour curfew&lt;/a&gt;.  The mayor has been the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wreg.com/global/story.asp?s=8485252&quot;&gt;subject&lt;/a&gt; of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.helena-arkansas.com/news/x469162793/&quot;&gt;controversy&lt;/a&gt; in the past. </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.74091</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 10:04:56 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>4thamendment</category>
		<category>ACLU</category>
		<category>Arkansas</category>
		<category>constitution</category>
		<category>curfew</category>
		<category>fourthamendment</category>
		<category>Helena</category>
		<category>unconstitutional</category>
		<category>WestHelena</category>
		<dc:creator>Daddy-O</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Can you hear me now?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/57846/Can%2Dyou%2Dhear%2Dme%2Dnow</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://apnews.myway.com//article/20070117/D8MN7KQ00.html"&gt;Illegal wiretaps to end.&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.57846</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 17:19:42 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bush</category>
		<category>constitution</category>
		<category>fisa</category>
		<category>fourthamendment</category>
		<category>wiretapping</category>
		<dc:creator>EarBucket</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Self-examination from the Fourth Estate &#8212; &quot;Yep, still there.&quot;</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/52571/Selfexamination%2Dfrom%2Dthe%2DFourth%2DEstate%2DYep%2Dstill%2Dthere</link>
		<description> &lt;i&gt;&quot;And yet the people who invented this country saw an aggressive, independent press as a protective measure against the abuse of power in a democracy, and an essential ingredient for self-government.&quot;&lt;/i&gt; Bill Keller, executive editor of the New York Times, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/25/business/media/25keller-letter.html&quot;&gt;publicly responds to criticisms&lt;/a&gt; on the publication of information about &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/23/washington/23intel.html&quot;&gt;clandestine surveillance of private bank records of Americans&lt;/a&gt;, offering a rare glimpse into the Fourth Estate&apos;s complicated negotiations with the government over issues of public interest.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.52571</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2006 16:02:43 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>civilliberties</category>
		<category>civilrights</category>
		<category>constitution</category>
		<category>fourthamendment</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>oversight</category>
		<category>privacy</category>
		<dc:creator>Mr. Six</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Please don&#8217;t let the cops in the house while I&#8217;m at the store.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/50304/Please%2Ddon%3Ft%2Dlet%2Dthe%2Dcops%2Din%2Dthe%2Dhouse%2Dwhile%2DI%3Fm%2Dat%2Dthe%2Dstore</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.scotusblog.com/movabletype/archives/2006/03/court_limits_se.html "&gt;Yesterday the U.S. Supreme Court held&lt;/a&gt; in a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/05pdf/04-1067.pdf&quot;&gt;5-3 decision&lt;/a&gt; (.pdf) that police may not search a home if any inhabitant of the home is present and objects to the search, even if another inhabitant consents.  The Court drew what it acknowledged is a &#8220;fine line&#8221; &#8211; if a co-inhabitant is at the door and objects, the police can&#8217;t enter; but if the co-inhabitant is somewhere else &#8211; even in a nearby police car &#8211; and has no opportunity to object, then police don&#8217;t need his or her consent.  Chief Justice Roberts issued his first written dissent, blasting the majority&#8217;s &#8220;random&#8221; and &#8220;arbitrary&#8221; rule and suggesting that the ability of police to respond to domestic violence threats could be compromised.  The &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2006/03/23/politics/23scotus.html?ex=1300770000&amp;en=f76908d9d13520ca&amp;ei=5090&amp;partner=rssuserland&amp;emc=rss&quot;&gt;zingers in the footnotes &lt;/a&gt; may reveal &#8220;strains behind the surface placidity and collegiality of the young Roberts court.&#8221;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.50304</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2006 10:00:15 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>4thamendment</category>
		<category>conlaw</category>
		<category>consent</category>
		<category>constitution</category>
		<category>courts</category>
		<category>fourthamendment</category>
		<category>georgia</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>randolph</category>
		<category>search</category>
		<category>searchandseizure</category>
		<category>seizure</category>
		<category>supremecourt</category>
		<dc:creator>brain_drain</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Black-Bag Jobs</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/50202/BlackBag%2DJobs</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.usnews.com/usnews/news/articles/060327/27fbi.htm"&gt;&quot;Don&apos;t worry Mr. President, we have Kansas surrounded.&quot;&lt;/a&gt; Warrantless searches:  they&apos;re not just for wiretaps anymore.  &lt;i&gt;U.S. News and World Report&lt;/i&gt; probes the Bush administration&apos;s covert drive to conduct physical searches of American homes without court approval.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.50202</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Mar 2006 18:33:48 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>Constitution</category>
		<category>FourthAmendment</category>
		<category>Gonzales</category>
		<category>GOP</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>NSA</category>
		<category>privacy</category>
		<category>Republican</category>
		<category>surveillance</category>
		<category>terror</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<category>warrantless</category>
		<dc:creator>digaman</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Censuring Domestic Surveillance</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/49992/Censuring%2DDomestic%2DSurveillance</link>
		<description> &quot;Resolved that the United States Senate does hereby censure George W. Bush, president of the United States, and does condemn his unlawful authorization of wiretaps of Americans.&quot;  Invoking &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.crooksandliars.com/2006/03/12.html#a7493&quot;&gt;&quot;high crimes and misdemeanors,&quot;&lt;/a&gt; Wisconsin Senator Russ Feingold introduces a &lt;a href=&quot;http://feingold.senate.gov/censureresolution.pdf&quot;&gt;motion to censure&lt;/a&gt; [PDF link] President Bush for his controversial, &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NSA_warrantless_surveillance_controversy&quot;&gt;legally dubious&lt;/a&gt; NSA wiretapping program. Feingold declares: &lt;a href=&quot;http://feingold.senate.gov/~feingold/releases/06/03/20060312.html&quot;&gt;&quot;The President must be held accountable for authorizing a program that clearly violates the law.&quot;&lt;/a&gt; Republican leader Frist retorts: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nysun.com/article/28983&quot;&gt;&quot;It&apos;s a crazy political move&quot;&lt;/a&gt; that sends a &lt;a href=&quot;http://rawstory.com/news/2006/Full_transcript_Feingold_announces_he_will_0312.html&quot;&gt;&quot;terrible&quot; signal to Iran&lt;/a&gt;.  Democratic bloggers say: &lt;a href=&quot;http://contactcongress.blogspot.com/&quot;&gt;Call your senator&lt;/a&gt;. [More legal fallout from the NSA program recently discussed &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/49942&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.]  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.49992</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Mar 2006 09:22:26 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>censure</category>
		<category>civilliberties</category>
		<category>Constitution</category>
		<category>Democrats</category>
		<category>Feingold</category>
		<category>FourthAmendment</category>
		<category>Frist</category>
		<category>GOP</category>
		<category>newsfilter</category>
		<category>NSA</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>Senate</category>
		<category>spying</category>
		<category>surveillance</category>
		<category>terrorism</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<dc:creator>digaman</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Tell &apos;em Uncle Alberto Says It&apos;s Cool</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/49848/Tell%2Dem%2DUncle%2DAlberto%2DSays%2DIts%2DCool</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2006/03/08/gop_senators_refuse_eavesdropping_inquiry/"&gt;&apos;The committee is, to put it bluntly, basically under the control of the White House,&quot;&lt;/a&gt; said Jay Rockefeller, vice-president of the Senate Intelligence Committee, after the committee quashed a broad inquiry into the legality of the NSA spying on Americans -- despite an increasing number of legal scholars &lt;a href=&quot;http://jurist.law.pitt.edu/forumy/2006/03/nsa-eavesdropping-and-fourth-amendment.php&quot;&gt;coming forward&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.constitutionproject.org/article.cfm?messageID=145&quot;&gt;declaring&lt;/a&gt; that the program is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fas.org/irp/congress/2006_hr/022806koh.html&quot;&gt;&quot;blatantly illegal,&quot;&lt;/a&gt; in the words of Yale Law School dean Harold Koh. Meanwhile, the GOP proposes &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/03/07/eavesdropping/&quot;&gt;giving spying on Americans the &quot;force of law&quot;&lt;/a&gt; while subjecting it to &quot;rigorous oversight.&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.49848</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2006 08:51:01 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>checksandbalances</category>
		<category>Constitution</category>
		<category>Democrats</category>
		<category>FourthAmendment</category>
		<category>GOP</category>
		<category>intelligence</category>
		<category>NSA</category>
		<category>Republicans</category>
		<category>Senate</category>
		<category>SenateSelectCommitteeonIntelligence</category>
		<category>spying</category>
		<category>surveillance</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<category>waronterror</category>
		<dc:creator>digaman</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


