<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with contract</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/contract</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'contract' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 13:37:37 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 13:37:37 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Presidential Betting Market Acting a Little Oddly</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/75128/Presidential%2DBetting%2DMarket%2DActing%2Da%2DLittle%2DOddly</link>
		<description> Nate Silver, the proprietor of the fantastic electoral projection site &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.FiveThirtyEight.com&quot;&gt;FiveThirtyEight.com&lt;/a&gt;, notices that &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2008/09/intrade-betting-is-suspcious.html&quot;&gt;the presidential betting market on Intrade is behaving very oddly&lt;/a&gt;: &quot;[S]ome individual trader or some small group of traders are shorting all the Obama contacts in bulk and resetting the entire market. The markets then organically climb back upward until the rogue trader strikes again six or eight hours later.&quot; &quot;So?&quot; you say. &quot;Meh.&quot;  But adding a little curiousity to this matter, &quot;this [rogue] trader is not only selling Obama contracts and buying McCain contracts ... they also seem to be buying Hillary Clinton contracts. [...] So someone is betting on some sort of disqualifying event happening to Obama.&quot;

Is this a zomgzomgzomgCONSPIRACY?!  No.  But it is a intriguing little side wrinkle.  And I imagine you didn&apos;t know that &quot;[b]etween the Obama and McCain contracts, there appears to be about $400,000 in contracts changing hands every day.&quot;&lt;sup&gt;1&lt;/sup&gt;

And, as Silver points out, &quot;I don&apos;t think this is any cause for alarm ... if &lt;i&gt;Joe Biden&lt;/i&gt; contracts were being bought up as part of this scheme, that might be more concerning, but they aren&apos;t. Still, if I were the FBI, I would probably want to know the identity of this trader.&quot;

&lt;small&gt;&lt;sup&gt;1&lt;/sup&gt;&quot;Contract&quot; being analogous in this case to &quot;bet.&quot;&lt;/small&gt; </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.75128</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 13:37:37 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>2008</category>
		<category>betting</category>
		<category>contract</category>
		<category>election</category>
		<category>mccain</category>
		<category>obama</category>
		<category>presidential</category>
		<category>usa</category>
		<dc:creator>WCityMike</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Old cases with weird facts still define our law of contracts</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/51835/Old%2Dcases%2Dwith%2Dweird%2Dfacts%2Dstill%2Ddefine%2Dour%2Dlaw%2Dof%2Dcontracts</link>
		<description> Modern contract law, which frames and defines our modern economy, is shaped by old and rather mundane disputes.  Consider some of the seminal cases:  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.kentlaw.edu/classes/rwarner/remedies/contract_lawhadley_v_baxendale.htm&quot;&gt;Hadley v. Baxendale&lt;/a&gt; (1854);  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.west.net/~smith/Hamer_v_Sidway.htm&quot;&gt;Hamer v. Sidway&lt;/a&gt; (1891); &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.justis.com/titles/iclr_r9321042.html&quot;&gt;Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball Co.&lt;/a&gt; (1892); &lt;a href=&quot;http://vantech.vsb.bc.ca/ss/pm/law12/2003_4/law12/chikent/contracts/Contract_LawMills_v_Wyman.htm&quot;&gt;Mills v. Wyman&lt;/a&gt; (1825). These cases, while minor in their actual factual footprint, still shape the world of contracts over a century later.  (more about the cases inside)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.51835</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2006 11:30:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>acceptance</category>
		<category>Baxendale</category>
		<category>bilateralcontract</category>
		<category>breachofwarranty</category>
		<category>CarbolicSmokeBall</category>
		<category>Carlill</category>
		<category>Carlillv.CarbolicSmokeBallCo.</category>
		<category>ChristopherColumbusLangdell</category>
		<category>commonlaw</category>
		<category>consequentialdamages</category>
		<category>consideration</category>
		<category>contract</category>
		<category>DeanLangdell</category>
		<category>EnglishLaw</category>
		<category>expectationdamages</category>
		<category>expectationinterest</category>
		<category>facts</category>
		<category>foreseeability</category>
		<category>foreseeabilityofdamages</category>
		<category>Hadley</category>
		<category>Hadleyv.Baxendale</category>
		<category>HairyHand</category>
		<category>Hamer</category>
		<category>Hamerv.Sidway</category>
		<category>Harrier</category>
		<category>Hawkins</category>
		<category>Hawkinsv.McGee</category>
		<category>illusorypromise</category>
		<category>Langdell</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>legal</category>
		<category>Leonardv.Pepsico</category>
		<category>Lucy</category>
		<category>LucyvZehmer</category>
		<category>McGee</category>
		<category>Mills</category>
		<category>Millsv.Wyman</category>
		<category>moralobligation</category>
		<category>mutualityofconsideration</category>
		<category>offer</category>
		<category>preexistinglegalobligation</category>
		<category>Priday&apos;sMill</category>
		<category>ProfessorKingsfield</category>
		<category>restitution</category>
		<category>Sidway</category>
		<category>SmokeBall</category>
		<category>ThePaperChase</category>
		<category>unilateralcontract</category>
		<category>validconsideration</category>
		<category>Wyman</category>
		<category>Zehmer</category>
		<dc:creator>dios</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Best part? The font.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/49310/Best%2Dpart%2DThe%2Dfont</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/0217062contract1.html&quot;&gt;&quot;You will be naked within 20 minutes of the kids being in bed&#8230;&lt;/a&gt;You are to do everything that is requested or expected of you, if you do not, you are considered noncompliant.&quot; &#8211; from Travis Frey&apos;s &quot;Contract of Wifely Expectations&quot; which also includes detailed instructions what panties she can wear, what sex acts she must perform, how often and where she must shave and how she can earn &quot;good behavior days.&quot; Frey, 33, of Iowa, has been &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nbc13.com/news/6812175/detail.html&quot;&gt;charged with kidnapping his wife. &lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.49310</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2006 11:07:54 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bdsm</category>
		<category>bizarredocuments</category>
		<category>contract</category>
		<category>contracts</category>
		<category>debate</category>
		<category>divorcecourtgold</category>
		<category>fetish</category>
		<category>fetishes</category>
		<category>kidnapping</category>
		<category>kinks</category>
		<category>marriage</category>
		<category>master</category>
		<category>masterslave</category>
		<category>perversion</category>
		<category>sex</category>
		<category>sexslaves</category>
		<category>slave</category>
		<category>smokinggun</category>
		<category>thesmokinggun</category>
		<category>travisfrey</category>
		<category>wifelyexpectations</category>
		<dc:creator>CunningLinguist</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Damn the doctors, get me a Bible!</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/40806/Damn%2Dthe%2Ddoctors%2Dget%2Dme%2Da%2DBible</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://today.reuters.com/news/newsArticle.aspx?type=oddlyEnoughNews&amp;amp;storyID=2005-03-29T150243Z_01_N29730254_RTRIDST_0_ODD-SPORT-SOCCER-SCOTLAND-DC.XML"&gt;Get Me a Faith Healer, STAT!&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt;Marvin Andrews, a Trinidadian and Tobagoan defender with the Glasgow Rangers, sustained damage to his knee that team doctors say requires surgery to repair. He&apos;s decided that God will repair him and says that he will continue practicing and playing. This is on the heels of a recent faith-healed groin injury.
&lt;br&gt;The question is this, if a professional athlete refuses to take the advice of the team&apos;s doctors and continues to play with an injury, is his team still responsible for his health and well-being? What about paying out his contract if the injury progresses to the point where he can no longer play?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.40806</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2005 13:45:22 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>contract</category>
		<category>faithhealing</category>
		<category>kneeinjury</category>
		<category>prosports</category>
		<category>soccer</category>
		<dc:creator>fenriq</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Simpsons stars strike for more &apos;D&apos;oh!&apos;</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/32173/Simpsons%2Dstars%2Dstrike%2Dfor%2Dmore%2DDoh</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://msnbc.msn.com/id/4645435/"&gt;Simpson stars strike for more &apos;D&apos;oh!&apos;&lt;/a&gt; The voices of the Simpsons are on strike for $360,000 an episode. Seems almost reasonable for such a pop culture phenomenon, but the voiceover work equates to one work day per episode.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.32173</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Apr 2004 09:43:30 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>contract</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>strike</category>
		<category>television</category>
		<category>TheSimpsons</category>
		<category>TV</category>
		<category>voiceactors</category>
		<dc:creator>BurnedEve</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Mi verso es un ciervo herido, que en el bosque busca amparo</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/27933/Mi%2Dverso%2Des%2Dun%2Dciervo%2Dherido%2Dque%2Den%2Del%2Dbosque%2Dbusca%2Damparo</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.miami.com/mld/miamiherald/news/world/6604462.htm"&gt;Guantanamo is growing&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt;
&lt;small&gt;... and a Halliburton subsidiary lands yet another no-bid contract. Its total bill for the U.S. government last year: 1.3 billion. &lt;a href=&quot;http://reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?type=politicsNews&amp;storyID=3348235&quot;&gt;Maybe more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/small&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.27933</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2003 09:39:53 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>contract</category>
		<category>Guantanamo</category>
		<category>Halliburton</category>
		<category>prison</category>
		<category>USGovernment</category>
		<category>waronterror</category>
		<dc:creator>magullo</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/11862/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.lockheedmartin.com"&gt;Lockheed Martin&lt;/a&gt; beat out Boeing for a &lt;a href=&quot;http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/ap/20011026/ts/future_fighter_jet_12.html&quot;&gt;$200 Billion contract&lt;/a&gt; to build the new &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.jast.mil/Gallery/Gal_X35_1.htm&quot;&gt;F-35&lt;/a&gt; fighters jets earlier today.  Missile defense, planes that can take off vertically, bombs that fry electronics...military technology is accelerating at a really frightening pace.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.11862</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2001 18:41:49 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>aviation</category>
		<category>Boeing</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>contract</category>
		<category>F35</category>
		<category>F-35</category>
		<category>fighter</category>
		<category>jets</category>
		<category>LockheedMartin</category>
		<category>military</category>
		<category>planes</category>
		<category>technology</category>
		<dc:creator>catatonic</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/10465/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.zdnet.com/zdnn/stories/news/0,4586,2812834,00.html?chkpt=zdnn_nbs_hl"&gt;Is the GPL a binding legal contract?&lt;/a&gt; If so, who would be able to (and could afford to) bring necessary legal action against groups who choose to ignore the terms?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.10465</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2001 13:11:53 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>contract</category>
		<category>gpl</category>
		<category>legal</category>
		<dc:creator>milnak</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/6222/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.cleveland.com/entertainment/index.ssf?/entertainment/pd/e06net.html"&gt;It seems Metallica has some high class company.&lt;/a&gt; The Cleveland Orchestra has halted distribution of their concerts to about 250 U.S. radio stations because of concerns about streaming audio. &lt;i&gt;The orchestra&apos;s contract with its musicians covers radio broadcasting rights of live performances, but not Internet streaming, said Gary Hanson, the orchestra&apos;s associate executive director.&lt;/i&gt; Does this strike anyone else as strange?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.6222</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2001 08:47:06 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>artist</category>
		<category>audio</category>
		<category>broadcast</category>
		<category>contract</category>
		<category>copyright</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>music</category>
		<category>stream</category>
		<category>streamingaudio</category>
		<dc:creator>Aaaugh!</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


