<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with copyright and rights</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/copyright+rights</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'copyright' and 'rights' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 21:19:17 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 21:19:17 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Sandra Burt gets some Satisfaction.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/86041/Sandra%2DBurt%2Dgets%2Dsome%2DSatisfaction</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1220423/Corner-store-worker-told-stop-singing-works--pay-licence.html#ixzz0UdPBDMOJ&quot;&gt;&quot;It&apos;s ridiculous. What&apos;s the world coming to when Big Brother wants to charge you for singing a wee tune?&quot;&lt;/a&gt;, Sandra Burt said. So, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.prsformusic.com/Pages/default.aspx&quot;&gt;Big Brother&lt;/a&gt; thought about it a bit, and decided, well, &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/scotland/tayside_and_central/8317952.stm&quot;&gt;maybe she&apos;s right&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.86041</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 21:19:17 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Burt</category>
		<category>copyright</category>
		<category>grocery</category>
		<category>music</category>
		<category>performance</category>
		<category>rights</category>
		<category>Sandra</category>
		<dc:creator>flapjax at midnite</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Who owns your ink?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/73651/Who%2Downs%2Dyour%2Dink</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wisegeek.com/can-you-copyright-a-tattoo.htm&quot;&gt;Can you copyright a tattoo?&lt;/a&gt; Yes, you can. But there&apos;s more to it. The idea raises a lot of questions and concerns&#8212;for the artists, the inked-skin owners, and certain parties seeking to represent or showcase the work. Shortly after Marisa Kakoulas wrote &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bmezine.com/news/guest/20031208.html&quot;&gt;The Tattoo Copyright Controversy&lt;/a&gt; guest article, featured at BMEZINE.com, she encountered a small legal battle of her own. She wrote about it &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bmezine.com/news/legal/20041110.html&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;, and sums up with, &lt;em&gt;&quot;But his story is a good example of how the modified community can fight back against those that violate our rights. I can almost guarantee he won&#8217;t mess with us again.&quot;&lt;/em&gt;

Christopher A. Harkins also weighs in, with his paper, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lclark.edu/org/lclr/objects/LCB10_2_Harkins.pdf&quot;&gt;&quot;Tattoos and Copyright Infringement: Celebrities, Marketers, and Businesses Beware of the Ink&quot; (PDF).&lt;/a&gt; In it, he describes how Matthew Reed (tattoo artist) sued Rasheed Wallace (of the Detroit Pistons), Nike, and Weiden &amp; Kennedy (Nike&apos;s ad agency), for violating copyright law, when Rasheed&apos;s tattooed arm was repeatedly highlighted in a Nike campaign. 

&lt;em&gt;&quot;The Reed case&#8212;and its nascent theory of a tattoo artist asserting copyrights in tattoos&#8212;has a potentially far-reaching impact on any would-be celebrity with a reasonable expectation of fame and on any present-day athlete, actor or actress, as well as advertising agencies and product purveyors and service providers. But the Reed case may also cause alarm for other media industries such as magazines, newspapers, Internet websites, motion pictures, television broadcasting, and the entertainment industry.&quot; &lt;/em&gt; </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.73651</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 18:26:03 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bodymodification</category>
		<category>copyright</category>
		<category>ink</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>laywers</category>
		<category>ownership</category>
		<category>rights</category>
		<category>tattoo</category>
		<category>tattoos</category>
		<dc:creator>iamkimiam</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>New music, new business model</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/53989/New%2Dmusic%2Dnew%2Dbusiness%2Dmodel</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.sellaband.com/"&gt;Wish you could have bought shares of Pearl Jam before they were famous?&lt;/a&gt; Fans sponsor bands in $10 &apos;parts&apos;.  Once 5000 parts have been pledged, the band gets a proper studio recording.  Tracks are made available free.  CD&apos;s are sold.  Money goes to the band and to the &apos;believers&apos; who sponsored them.  Might work.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.arancidamoeba.com/mrr/problemwithmusic.html&quot;&gt;Probably better than this model&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.53989</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2006 20:57:15 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>copyright</category>
		<category>music</category>
		<category>rights</category>
		<dc:creator>gregor-e</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>sunny day...</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/53907/sunny%2Dday</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8TeNdsoCIgc"&gt;Ernest and Bertram&lt;/a&gt; --short film, formerly one of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1589/is_2002_July_23/ai_89871734&quot;&gt;the best films you can&apos;t see&lt;/a&gt; after debuting at Sundance in 2002, with Sesame&apos;s lawyers then cracking down and forcing it to be pulled--now on youtube.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.53907</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Aug 2006 06:49:52 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>art</category>
		<category>cease</category>
		<category>copyright</category>
		<category>desist</category>
		<category>film</category>
		<category>gay</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>queer</category>
		<category>rights</category>
		<category>sesamestreet</category>
		<category>sundance</category>
		<category>use</category>
		<dc:creator>amberglow</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Bring on the lawyers, SOM allegedly steals student&apos;s design</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/36866/Bring%2Don%2Dthe%2Dlawyers%2DSOM%2Dallegedly%2Dsteals%2Dstudents%2Ddesign</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nynewsday.com/news/local/manhattan/wtc/ny-bc-ny--freedomtowerlawsu1108nov08,0,5654708.story?coll=nyc-homepage-headlines"&gt;Thomas Shine, a former Yale student, is suing David Childs for copyright infringement&lt;/a&gt; Mr. Childs of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.som.com/&quot;&gt;Skidmore, Owings &amp;amp; Merrill&lt;/a&gt; for copyright infringement over the design of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.renewnyc.com/plan_des_dev/wtc_site/new_design_plans/Freedom_Tower/freedom_tower_dec_19.asp&quot;&gt;Freedom Tower&lt;/a&gt; located at Ground Zero. Shine alleges in his lawsuit that the proposed Freedom Tower was &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.archinect.com/gallery/displayimage.php?album=7&amp;pos=0&quot;&gt;strikingly similar&lt;/a&gt;&quot; to his &quot;Olympic Tower&quot; design for the proposed &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nyc2012.com/&quot;&gt;2012 Olympic Games in New York&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.36866</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2004 08:10:37 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>architecture</category>
		<category>art</category>
		<category>copyright</category>
		<category>freedomtower</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>newyork</category>
		<category>newyorkcity</category>
		<category>nyc</category>
		<category>olympics</category>
		<category>rights</category>
		<category>yale</category>
		<dc:creator>plemeljr</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>How I Lost the Big One</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/31536/How%2DI%2DLost%2Dthe%2DBig%2DOne</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.legalaffairs.org/issues/March-April-2004/story_lessig_marapr04.html"&gt;How I Lost the Big One&lt;/a&gt; Lawrence Lessig on losing Eldred v. Ashcroft: &quot;We had in our Constitution a commitment to free culture. In the case that I fathered, the Supreme Court effectively renounced that commitment. A better lawyer would have made them see differently.&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.31536</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2004 00:53:18 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Ashcroft</category>
		<category>Copyright</category>
		<category>Eldred</category>
		<category>FreeCulture</category>
		<category>FreeSpeech</category>
		<category>Law</category>
		<category>LawrenceLessig</category>
		<category>Lawyer</category>
		<category>Lessig</category>
		<category>Liberty</category>
		<category>Rights</category>
		<category>SupremeCourt</category>
		<dc:creator>ericost</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Copyright Infringement Like Nothing Else!</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/24027/Copyright%2DInfringement%2DLike%2DNothing%2DElse</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.perryhoberman.com/accept/html/infringement.html"&gt;The Future of Copyright?&lt;/a&gt; Spoof GUI alerts from new media artist &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.perryhoberman.com/&quot;&gt;Perry Hoberman&lt;/a&gt;. Wry, yet creatively chilling satire . Also be sure out the rest of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.perryhoberman.com/accept/index.html&quot;&gt;&quot;ACCEPT&quot; exhibit&lt;/a&gt;, especially the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.perryhoberman.com/accept/html/okCancel.html&quot;&gt;OK/Cancel&lt;/a&gt; dialog boxes and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.perryhoberman.com/accept/html/spam.html&quot;&gt;My Life in Spam&lt;/a&gt;. Hey, has anyone here seen this exhibit in person?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.24027</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2003 19:00:10 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>art</category>
		<category>copyright</category>
		<category>rights</category>
		<dc:creator>brownpau</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/18535/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.stoppoliceware.org/"&gt;WHAT IS THE CBDTPA?&lt;/a&gt; The law would force all new personal computers and digital home entertainment devices sold in the United States to have government-approved &quot;policeware&quot; built-in.

This policeware would restrict your use of copyrighted material on these devices -- including music files and CD&apos;s, video clips, DVD&apos;s, e-books, and more. 
 </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.18535</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jul 2002 10:28:04 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>copyright</category>
		<category>drm</category>
		<category>police</category>
		<category>policeware</category>
		<category>rights</category>
		<dc:creator>Niahmas</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/15518/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.digitalconsumer.org/"&gt;DigitalConsumer.org&lt;/a&gt; is trying to get Congress to pass a six-point Consumer Technology Bill of Rights to protect the legitimate rights of honest consumers who buy copyrighted content legally. You can read about the issue and the group in &lt;a href=&quot;http://ptech.wsj.com/archive/ptech-20020314.html&quot;&gt;Walt Mossberg&apos;s WSJ column&lt;/a&gt;.
 </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.15518</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2002 10:13:15 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Congress</category>
		<category>Consumer</category>
		<category>Copyright</category>
		<category>DigitalConsumer</category>
		<category>Law</category>
		<category>Liberty</category>
		<category>Rights</category>
		<category>Technology</category>
		<dc:creator>pmurray63</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/7397/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.s-t.com/daily/08-96/08-23-96/b02li056.htm"&gt;I hope ASCAP is proud.&lt;/a&gt; I don&apos;t know about you, but I&apos;ll be sure to notify all Girl Scouts I know, that singing copyrighted material (you know like &quot;Happy Birthday and &quot;God Bless America&quot;) at camp might just land there camp directors behind bars.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.7397</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2001 10:09:22 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>ascap</category>
		<category>copyright</category>
		<category>girlscouts</category>
		<category>happybirthday</category>
		<category>music</category>
		<category>rights</category>
		<category>singing</category>
		<category>songs</category>
		<dc:creator>Qambient</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


