8 posts tagged with copyright by baylink.
Displaying 1 through 8 of 8.

Related tags:
+ (102)
+ (68)
+ (68)
+ (58)
+ (56)
+ (47)
+ (44)
+ (41)
+ (34)
+ (29)
+ (26)
+ (25)
+ (23)
+ (21)
+ (19)
+ (18)
+ (18)
+ (17)
+ (16)
+ (16)
+ (16)
+ (15)
+ (14)
+ (14)
+ (13)
+ (12)
+ (12)
+ (12)
+ (12)
+ (12)
+ (11)
+ (10)
+ (10)
+ (10)
+ (10)
+ (9)
+ (9)
+ (9)
+ (8)
+ (8)
+ (8)
+ (8)
+ (8)
+ (8)
+ (7)
+ (7)
+ (7)
+ (7)
+ (7)
+ (7)
+ (7)
+ (6)
+ (6)
+ (6)
+ (6)
+ (6)
+ (6)
+ (6)
+ (6)
+ (6)


Users that often use this tag:
jeffburdges (15)
mathowie (15)
stbalbach (8)
baylink (8)
anathema (7)
Steven Den Beste (7)
skallas (6)
Horace Rumpole (6)
Artw (6)
finite (4)
Toekneesan (4)
ZachsMind (4)
Mick (3)
da5id (3)
aaron (3)
Blue Stone (3)
Maxor (3)
zarq (3)
Kikkoman (3)
flapjax at midnite (3)
griphus (2)
motty (2)
Chocolate Pickle (2)
Joe Beese (2)
Marisa Stole the P... (2)
Avenger50 (2)
Blazecock Pileon (2)
ND¢ (2)
IronLizard (2)
starman (2)
divabat (2)
goodnewsfortheinsane (2)
shawnj (2)
mr.marx (2)
chunking express (2)
feelinglistless (2)
DiplomaticImmunity (2)
Ljubljana (2)
hairyeyeball (2)
XQUZYPHYR (2)
caddis (2)
amberglow (2)
dash_slot- (2)
Blake (2)
mrgrimm (2)
tpoh.org (2)
me3dia (2)
xowie (2)
waxpancake (2)
aflakete (2)
Brilliantcrank (2)
silusGROK (2)
Jairus (2)
bkdelong (2)
quonsar (2)
cedar (2)
PWA_BadBoy (2)
grant (2)
Ok... let me get this straight. copyright.net has turned loose a tapeworm, called CopyrightAgent, that crawls around on your computer without your permission, looking for copyrighted MP3 files. If it find them, it reports back your IP address, and they have Napster block you, if you're a Napster user. Otherwise, they contact your ISP, and have *them* block you under the DMCA.

And the first I heard about this was a Knight-Ridder wire story in my local paper?? Why the hell hasn't the Internet reacted by burning these people's offices (or uplink :-) to the ground?
posted by baylink on Mar 3, 2001 - 20 comments

Wired News reports on the upcoming DMCA review. Via Linux Weekly News: "When music is streamed, webcasters are required to pay a performance royalty. In order to generate smooth playback of incoming streams, computers temporarily store some of the data in memory in a RAM buffer. Music publishers have stated that the data in this buffer should be considered a physical creation that would require webcasters to pay a mechanical royalty, similar to what they pay for downloads or CDs." Anyone need any more on that? Time to get your congressman on the phone...
posted by baylink on Nov 30, 2000 - 3 comments

Are taxonomai copyrightable? This topic isn't new; West Publishing stole their legal referencing system from the government, then copyrighted it and successfully sued a couple people out of business. But should it be possible? [Hint: Hell, no!]
posted by baylink on Oct 26, 2000 - 7 comments

Music Industry to back down on Work-For-Hire. If you read the Courtney Love stories last month, you'll have heard that they snuck one across the plate in a satellite TV bill. Everyone screamed, and they've apparently decided to fight other battles. [spotted on Jerry Pournelle's mail page]
posted by baylink on Aug 14, 2000 - 1 comment

"Hatch Warns Labels, Don't Make Me Come Over There and Spank You" Oooh! This is gonna be good. [ From Inside via Dan Lyke's excellent Flutterby. ]
posted by baylink on Jul 13, 2000 - 20 comments

And now, here's something we hope you'll really like...
Californian David Simon decided that It Would Be Nice If you could use the Internet like your VCR. The MPAA and the Studios disagreed. Is this guy crazy? Or crazy like a fox?
posted by baylink on Jun 27, 2000 - 8 comments

Where am I going, and why am I in this handbasket? What's happening to copyright law lately, why, why ignoring it may well be the best thing to do to fix it, and why Mickey Mouse is a Yakuza. Very nice piece from (former?) EFF Legal Counsel Mike Godwin
posted by baylink on Jun 21, 2000 - 6 comments

Patently Absurd. James Gleick, chaos researcher and all-around smart guy, has written a very nice piece for the New York Times Magazine about the current spate of stupidity at the US Patent and Trademark Office.

Most important, in my view, is that unlike the John Perry Barlow piece we discussed earlier, the Gleick piece got national press... which is far more important than we geeks think...
posted by baylink on Jun 5, 2000 - 5 comments

Page: 1