<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with courttv</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/courttv</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'courttv' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 02 Aug 2002 14:28:41 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Aug 2002 14:28:41 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/18891/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2002/08/02/sports/othersports/02SKAT.html"&gt;Finally, a Reason to Watch Court TV?&lt;/a&gt; An Olympics skating vote rigging Russian mafia fraud trial--what fun!  Hope this happens, and I hope in happens in New York&apos;s Federal Southern District, because, well, what fun to bring down a stupid sport (And remove it from television); discredit the French, Russians...  I want seats to this one!  Or Perhaps E! will provide the coverage?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.18891</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Aug 2002 14:28:41 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>courttv</category>
		<category>figureskating</category>
		<category>mafia</category>
		<category>mob</category>
		<category>russia</category>
		<category>skating</category>
		<category>sports</category>
		<dc:creator>ParisParamus</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/13381/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.law.com/cgi-bin/gx.cgi/AppLogic+FTContentServer?pagename=law/View&amp;amp;c=Article&amp;amp;cid=ZZZDLY2UPVC&amp;amp;live=true&amp;amp;cst=1&amp;amp;pc=3&amp;amp;pa=0&amp;amp;s=News&amp;amp;ExpIgnore=true&amp;amp;showsummary=0"&gt;Court TV Seeks to Broadcast Moussaoui Trial.  &lt;/a&gt; The Senate has passed a bill allowing for the closed circuit televising (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.courttv.com/casefiles/oklahoma/documents/govcirc.html&quot; title=&quot;May 1, 1996 brief, the government asks that closed-circuit television be set up for Oklahoma City bombing victims and their family members&quot;&gt;similar to that used in the case against McVeigh and Nichols&lt;/a&gt;) of the trial in this case to a number of locations for victims of the crimes associated with the terrorist acts of September 11th, who have an interest in attending, but can not do so because of inconvenience and expense.  Federal rules prohibit TV cameras in the courtroom, but Court TV argues that the prohibition is unconstitutional.  Television coverage has come a long way from the &lt;a href=&quot;http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=US&amp;vol=381&amp;invol=532&quot; title=&quot;Estes v. Texas&quot;&gt;first case involving the impact of radio and television broadcasting&lt;/a&gt; before the U.S. Supreme Court, which resulted in an overturned conviction.   Should cameras be allowed in the courtroom, and if they are, will they &lt;a href=&quot;http://tlhsrv3.flabar.org/RHandbook01.nsf/1119bd38ae090a748525676f0053b606/5192d3660a0dd573852569cb004c8e15?OpenDocument&quot; title=&quot;see this article&apos;s sections on the historical perspective of courtroom media coverage and on federal courtrooms&quot;&gt; shape the outcome of the trial?&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.13381</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2001 22:55:49 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>CourtTV</category>
		<category>lawsuit</category>
		<category>Moussaoui</category>
		<category>television</category>
		<category>trial</category>
		<category>TV</category>
		<dc:creator>bragadocchio</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


